学校辅导员的伦理决策方法

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/2326716X.2016.1223569

M. Luke, D. Gilbride, Kristopher M. Goodrich

{"title":"学校辅导员的伦理决策方法","authors":"M. Luke, D. Gilbride, Kristopher M. Goodrich","doi":"10.1080/2326716X.2016.1223569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This cross-sectional study explored 897 participants’ decision making in response to a school counseling case containing an ethical dilemma and compared respondents’ approach to the variables included in the Intercultural Model of Ethical Decision Making (IMED). Although 60% of participants identified that the school counselor’s beliefs could influence decision making, only 10% identified the ethical issue. Differences were found in the resources consulted across those who identified the ethical issue and those who did not. Results and implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":37213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School Counselors’ Approach to Ethical Decision Making\",\"authors\":\"M. Luke, D. Gilbride, Kristopher M. Goodrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2326716X.2016.1223569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This cross-sectional study explored 897 participants’ decision making in response to a school counseling case containing an ethical dilemma and compared respondents’ approach to the variables included in the Intercultural Model of Ethical Decision Making (IMED). Although 60% of participants identified that the school counselor’s beliefs could influence decision making, only 10% identified the ethical issue. Differences were found in the resources consulted across those who identified the ethical issue and those who did not. Results and implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2016.1223569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2016.1223569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要本横断面研究探讨了897名参与者对一个包含伦理困境的学校咨询案例的决策，并比较了受访者对跨文化伦理决策模型(IMED)中包含的变量的处理方法。虽然60%的参与者认为学校辅导员的信念会影响决策，但只有10%的人认为存在道德问题。在发现道德问题的人和没有发现道德问题的人之间，他们所咨询的资源存在差异。讨论了结果和意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

School Counselors’ Approach to Ethical Decision Making

ABSTRACT This cross-sectional study explored 897 participants’ decision making in response to a school counseling case containing an ethical dilemma and compared respondents’ approach to the variables included in the Intercultural Model of Ethical Decision Making (IMED). Although 60% of participants identified that the school counselor’s beliefs could influence decision making, only 10% identified the ethical issue. Differences were found in the resources consulted across those who identified the ethical issue and those who did not. Results and implications are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量