奴隶贸易和废除:罗安达的性别、商业和经济转型

Hermann W. von Hesse
{"title":"奴隶贸易和废除:罗安达的性别、商业和经济转型","authors":"Hermann W. von Hesse","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2022.2121514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"be an asset to this country”: Canadian Restrictions of Black Caribbean Female Domestic Workers, 1910–1955. In this chapter, Johnson uses a vast archive of legislation, immigration policies and official correspondence between Caribbean and Canadian officials to argue that “Canadian immigration and other authorities sustained a deliberate and racist rejection of Black female immigration into the Dominion” (281). She links this rejection to fear of Black families and Black communities, as well as to the concomitant fear of Black women as the putative nucleus of both. Finally, Esmeralda M. A. Thornhill’s “Re-Thinking and Re-Framing RDS: A Black Woman’s Perspective” is a meticulous critical review of the aforementioned 1997 Supreme Court of Canada landmark case R. v. S. that situates the courtroom as “a colonized space of White privilege, White entitlement, and above all, White comfort” (566). Moving into the present, Thornhill’s perceptive essay concludes that Black Canadians are still construed “as disruptive of the country’s touted founding image: ‘a White man’s country’” (540). Unsettling the Great White North is a timely, comprehensive and major contribution to the field of Black Canadian history. Barring the puzzling omission of an index, this is a truly impressive collection in both ambition and execution. Surely it will become a vital resource to all students of Canadian history.","PeriodicalId":9481,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","volume":"20 1","pages":"252 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slave Trade and Abolition: Gender, Commerce, and Economic Transition in Luanda\",\"authors\":\"Hermann W. von Hesse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00083968.2022.2121514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"be an asset to this country”: Canadian Restrictions of Black Caribbean Female Domestic Workers, 1910–1955. In this chapter, Johnson uses a vast archive of legislation, immigration policies and official correspondence between Caribbean and Canadian officials to argue that “Canadian immigration and other authorities sustained a deliberate and racist rejection of Black female immigration into the Dominion” (281). She links this rejection to fear of Black families and Black communities, as well as to the concomitant fear of Black women as the putative nucleus of both. Finally, Esmeralda M. A. Thornhill’s “Re-Thinking and Re-Framing RDS: A Black Woman’s Perspective” is a meticulous critical review of the aforementioned 1997 Supreme Court of Canada landmark case R. v. S. that situates the courtroom as “a colonized space of White privilege, White entitlement, and above all, White comfort” (566). Moving into the present, Thornhill’s perceptive essay concludes that Black Canadians are still construed “as disruptive of the country’s touted founding image: ‘a White man’s country’” (540). Unsettling the Great White North is a timely, comprehensive and major contribution to the field of Black Canadian history. Barring the puzzling omission of an index, this is a truly impressive collection in both ambition and execution. Surely it will become a vital resource to all students of Canadian history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"252 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2022.2121514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2022.2121514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

成为这个国家的财富”:1910-1955年加拿大对加勒比黑人女性家庭佣工的限制。在这一章中,约翰逊使用了大量的立法、移民政策和加勒比和加拿大官员之间的官方通信档案来论证“加拿大移民和其他当局对黑人女性移民进入自治领进行了蓄意和种族主义的拒绝”(281)。她将这种拒绝与对黑人家庭和黑人社区的恐惧联系起来,以及随之而来的对黑人女性的恐惧,这两者都被认为是核心。最后,Esmeralda M. A. Thornhill的《重新思考和重新构建RDS:一个黑人女性的视角》是对上文提到的1997年加拿大最高法院具有里程碑意义的R. v. s案的细致批判性回顾,该案将法庭定位为“白人特权、白人权利,尤其是白人舒适的殖民空间”(566)。进入到现在,Thornhill敏锐的文章总结道,加拿大黑人仍然被认为“破坏了这个国家被吹捧的建国形象:‘一个白人的国家’”(540)。《惊扰伟大的北方白人》是对加拿大黑人历史领域及时、全面和重大的贡献。除了令人费解的索引遗漏,这是一个真正令人印象深刻的集合在雄心和执行。当然,它将成为所有加拿大历史学生的重要资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Slave Trade and Abolition: Gender, Commerce, and Economic Transition in Luanda
be an asset to this country”: Canadian Restrictions of Black Caribbean Female Domestic Workers, 1910–1955. In this chapter, Johnson uses a vast archive of legislation, immigration policies and official correspondence between Caribbean and Canadian officials to argue that “Canadian immigration and other authorities sustained a deliberate and racist rejection of Black female immigration into the Dominion” (281). She links this rejection to fear of Black families and Black communities, as well as to the concomitant fear of Black women as the putative nucleus of both. Finally, Esmeralda M. A. Thornhill’s “Re-Thinking and Re-Framing RDS: A Black Woman’s Perspective” is a meticulous critical review of the aforementioned 1997 Supreme Court of Canada landmark case R. v. S. that situates the courtroom as “a colonized space of White privilege, White entitlement, and above all, White comfort” (566). Moving into the present, Thornhill’s perceptive essay concludes that Black Canadians are still construed “as disruptive of the country’s touted founding image: ‘a White man’s country’” (540). Unsettling the Great White North is a timely, comprehensive and major contribution to the field of Black Canadian history. Barring the puzzling omission of an index, this is a truly impressive collection in both ambition and execution. Surely it will become a vital resource to all students of Canadian history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信