赞比亚利文斯通大学教学医院血培养标本分离细菌病原菌抗生素耐药模式的评估

Thresa N. Mwansa, J. A. Mulemena, W. Chanda
{"title":"赞比亚利文斯通大学教学医院血培养标本分离细菌病原菌抗生素耐药模式的评估","authors":"Thresa N. Mwansa, J. A. Mulemena, W. Chanda","doi":"10.55320/mjz.49.3.360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Bloodstream infections (BSI) are of public health concern because they are usually associated with high fatality rate if therapy is delayed. A combination of these infections with antibiotic resistance increases healthcare costs. In this study, microorganisms identified from blood cultures at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) between 2019 and 2021 were evaluated for their antibiotic resistance patterns. \nMethods: This was a single-centre laboratory based retrospective study. Data on isolated organisms from electronic laboratory system generated reports at LUTH microbiology laboratory for a period of 3 years, was analysed with SPSS version 20. \nResults: A total of 765 specimens were processed and only 331 (43.3%) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 331 specimens, 61.3% and 38.7% were collected from female and male patients, respectively whereas 65.9% came from out-patient departments and 34.1% from in-patient departments. The commonest bacteria isolate was Escherichia coli (27.2%) followed by Enterobacter agglomerans (22.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13%), Klebsiella oxytoca (6.3%), Enterobacter aerogenes (5.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (5.4%), Citrobacter freundii (4.8%), Serratia marcescens (3.6%), Proteus mirabilis (3.3%), and Staphylococcus aureus (2.7%). Of the common utilized antibiotics, ampicillin (92.9%) was the least effective drug followed by co-trimoxazole (82.7%), nalidixic acid (68.3%), penicillin (66.7%), tetracycline (63.5%), and chloramphenicol (50.3%), while imipenem (15.4%), norfloxacin (35.3%), and nitrofurantoin (38.8%) were the most effective. The patient's gender and hospital location may have an impact on antibiotic resistance.\nConclusion: The most common bacterial pathogens were Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae that showed increased resistance to various classes of commonly used antibiotics at LUTH but with low resistance to imipenem. Due to the observed multidrug resistant pathogens for BSI, it is cardinal for healthcare facilities to monitor bacteria resistance patterns regularly and encourage the prudent use of antibiotics. However, antibiotic selection for susceptibility testing should be based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Zambia National Formulary (ZNF) recommendations to only test antibiotics1r for BSI instead of those recommended for other infections like urinary tract infections (e.g., tetracyclines).","PeriodicalId":74149,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal of Zambia","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Blood Culture Specimens at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital in Zambia\",\"authors\":\"Thresa N. Mwansa, J. A. Mulemena, W. Chanda\",\"doi\":\"10.55320/mjz.49.3.360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Bloodstream infections (BSI) are of public health concern because they are usually associated with high fatality rate if therapy is delayed. A combination of these infections with antibiotic resistance increases healthcare costs. In this study, microorganisms identified from blood cultures at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) between 2019 and 2021 were evaluated for their antibiotic resistance patterns. \\nMethods: This was a single-centre laboratory based retrospective study. Data on isolated organisms from electronic laboratory system generated reports at LUTH microbiology laboratory for a period of 3 years, was analysed with SPSS version 20. \\nResults: A total of 765 specimens were processed and only 331 (43.3%) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 331 specimens, 61.3% and 38.7% were collected from female and male patients, respectively whereas 65.9% came from out-patient departments and 34.1% from in-patient departments. The commonest bacteria isolate was Escherichia coli (27.2%) followed by Enterobacter agglomerans (22.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13%), Klebsiella oxytoca (6.3%), Enterobacter aerogenes (5.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (5.4%), Citrobacter freundii (4.8%), Serratia marcescens (3.6%), Proteus mirabilis (3.3%), and Staphylococcus aureus (2.7%). Of the common utilized antibiotics, ampicillin (92.9%) was the least effective drug followed by co-trimoxazole (82.7%), nalidixic acid (68.3%), penicillin (66.7%), tetracycline (63.5%), and chloramphenicol (50.3%), while imipenem (15.4%), norfloxacin (35.3%), and nitrofurantoin (38.8%) were the most effective. The patient's gender and hospital location may have an impact on antibiotic resistance.\\nConclusion: The most common bacterial pathogens were Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae that showed increased resistance to various classes of commonly used antibiotics at LUTH but with low resistance to imipenem. Due to the observed multidrug resistant pathogens for BSI, it is cardinal for healthcare facilities to monitor bacteria resistance patterns regularly and encourage the prudent use of antibiotics. However, antibiotic selection for susceptibility testing should be based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Zambia National Formulary (ZNF) recommendations to only test antibiotics1r for BSI instead of those recommended for other infections like urinary tract infections (e.g., tetracyclines).\",\"PeriodicalId\":74149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical journal of Zambia\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical journal of Zambia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55320/mjz.49.3.360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal of Zambia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55320/mjz.49.3.360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。血液感染(BSI)是一个令人关注的公共卫生问题,因为如果治疗延迟,它们通常与高死亡率有关。这些感染加上抗生素耐药性增加了医疗费用。在这项研究中,对2019年至2021年在利文斯通大学教学医院(LUTH)血液培养中鉴定出的微生物的抗生素耐药性模式进行了评估。方法:本研究为单中心实验室回顾性研究。我校微生物实验室3年电子实验室系统生成报告的分离生物数据,用SPSS 20进行分析。结果:共处理标本765份,仅331份(43.3%)符合纳入标准。331例标本中,女性标本占61.3%,男性标本占38.7%,门诊标本占65.9%,住院标本占34.1%。最常见的分离菌为大肠杆菌(27.2%),其次为聚集肠杆菌(22.7%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(13%)、氧化克雷伯菌(6.3%)、产气肠杆菌(5.4%)、阴沟肠杆菌(5.4%)、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌(4.8%)、粘质沙雷菌(3.6%)、奇异变形杆菌(3.3%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(2.7%)。在常用抗菌药物中,氨苄西林(92.9%)疗效最差,其次是复方新诺明(82.7%)、萘啶酸(68.3%)、青霉素(66.7%)、四环素(63.5%)和氯霉素(50.3%),亚胺培南(15.4%)、诺氟沙星(35.3%)和呋喃妥英(38.8%)疗效最好。患者的性别和医院位置可能对抗生素耐药性有影响。结论:最常见的病原菌为革兰氏阴性肠杆菌科,其对各类常用抗生素的耐药性均有所增加,但对亚胺培南的耐药性较低。由于观察到BSI的多重耐药病原体,医疗机构必须定期监测细菌耐药模式,并鼓励谨慎使用抗生素。然而,药敏试验的抗生素选择应基于临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)和赞比亚国家处方集(ZNF)的建议,即仅检测BSI的抗生素,而不是推荐用于尿路感染等其他感染的抗生素(例如四环素)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Blood Culture Specimens at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital in Zambia
Background. Bloodstream infections (BSI) are of public health concern because they are usually associated with high fatality rate if therapy is delayed. A combination of these infections with antibiotic resistance increases healthcare costs. In this study, microorganisms identified from blood cultures at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) between 2019 and 2021 were evaluated for their antibiotic resistance patterns.  Methods: This was a single-centre laboratory based retrospective study. Data on isolated organisms from electronic laboratory system generated reports at LUTH microbiology laboratory for a period of 3 years, was analysed with SPSS version 20. Results: A total of 765 specimens were processed and only 331 (43.3%) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 331 specimens, 61.3% and 38.7% were collected from female and male patients, respectively whereas 65.9% came from out-patient departments and 34.1% from in-patient departments. The commonest bacteria isolate was Escherichia coli (27.2%) followed by Enterobacter agglomerans (22.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13%), Klebsiella oxytoca (6.3%), Enterobacter aerogenes (5.4%), Enterobacter cloacae (5.4%), Citrobacter freundii (4.8%), Serratia marcescens (3.6%), Proteus mirabilis (3.3%), and Staphylococcus aureus (2.7%). Of the common utilized antibiotics, ampicillin (92.9%) was the least effective drug followed by co-trimoxazole (82.7%), nalidixic acid (68.3%), penicillin (66.7%), tetracycline (63.5%), and chloramphenicol (50.3%), while imipenem (15.4%), norfloxacin (35.3%), and nitrofurantoin (38.8%) were the most effective. The patient's gender and hospital location may have an impact on antibiotic resistance. Conclusion: The most common bacterial pathogens were Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae that showed increased resistance to various classes of commonly used antibiotics at LUTH but with low resistance to imipenem. Due to the observed multidrug resistant pathogens for BSI, it is cardinal for healthcare facilities to monitor bacteria resistance patterns regularly and encourage the prudent use of antibiotics. However, antibiotic selection for susceptibility testing should be based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Zambia National Formulary (ZNF) recommendations to only test antibiotics1r for BSI instead of those recommended for other infections like urinary tract infections (e.g., tetracyclines).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信