域扩展与Kronecker构造

IF 1 Q1 MATHEMATICS
Christoph Schwarzweller
{"title":"域扩展与Kronecker构造","authors":"Christoph Schwarzweller","doi":"10.2478/forma-2019-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary This is the fourth part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [3], [2], [1] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/ as the desired field extension E [6], [4], [5]. In the first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\\F has a root over F [X]/. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ F [X]/ < p > as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/ < p >. Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/ and show that the translated polynomial ϕ (p) has a root over F [X]/. Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/ we construct in the second part the field (E \\ ϕF)∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ: F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/ and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E = ∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅. Surprisingly, as we show in the third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitrary fields F : With the exception of ℤ2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠ ∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of ℤn, ℚ and ℝ we have ℤn ∩ ℤn[X] = ∅, ℚ ∩ ℚ[X] = ∅ and ℝ ∩ ℝ[X] = ∅, respectively. In this fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F iff F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/ with the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/. Together with the first part this gives – for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ – a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\\F has a root.","PeriodicalId":42667,"journal":{"name":"Formalized Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field Extensions and Kronecker’s Construction\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Schwarzweller\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/forma-2019-0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary This is the fourth part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [3], [2], [1] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\\\\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/ as the desired field extension E [6], [4], [5]. In the first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\\\\F has a root over F [X]/. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ F [X]/ < p > as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/ < p >. Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/ and show that the translated polynomial ϕ (p) has a root over F [X]/. Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/ we construct in the second part the field (E \\\\ ϕF)∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ: F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/ and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E = ∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅. Surprisingly, as we show in the third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitrary fields F : With the exception of ℤ2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠ ∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of ℤn, ℚ and ℝ we have ℤn ∩ ℤn[X] = ∅, ℚ ∩ ℚ[X] = ∅ and ℝ ∩ ℝ[X] = ∅, respectively. In this fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F iff F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/ with the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/. Together with the first part this gives – for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ – a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\\\\F has a root.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formalized Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formalized Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/forma-2019-0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formalized Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/forma-2019-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

这是一个包含Mizar[3],[2],[1]的四篇文章系列的第四部分,该系列包含Kronecker关于域扩展中多项式根构造的形式,即对于每一个域F和每一个多项式p∈F [X]\F,存在一个F的域扩展E,使得p在E上有一个根。该形式遵循Kronecker使用F [X]/作为期望域扩展E[6],[4],[5]的经典证明。在第一部分中,我们证明了不可约多项式p∈F [X]\F在F [X]/上有一个根。然而,请注意,该陈述在严格的形式意义上不成立:我们没有F≤F [X]/ < p >作为集合,因此F不是F [X]/的子域,因此形式上p甚至不是F [X]/ < p >上的多项式。因此,我们沿着正则单态φ: F→F [X]/平移p,并证明平移后的多项式φ (p)在F [X]/上有根。因为F不是F [X]的子域,所以我们在第二部分构造给定单态φ: F→E的域(E \ F)∪F,并证明该域与F同构,并且包含F作为子域。在文献中,这部分证明通常包括说“可以将F与其在F [X]/中的映像 F识别,因此将F视为F [X]/的子域”。有趣的是,要做到这一点,我们需要假设F∩E =∅,特别是Kronecker的构造可以将F∩F [X] =∅形式化。令人惊讶的是,正如我们在第三部分中所展示的,这个条件对于任意域F并不自动成立:除了2之外,我们为每个域F构造一个F的同构副本F ', F '∩F ' [X]≠∅。我们还证明了对于Mizar的表示(0 n, 0 2, 0 3),我们分别有:0 n∩0 n[X] =∅,0∩0 2 [X] =∅,0∩0 2 [X] =∅。在第四部分中,我们最终定义了场扩展:E是F的场扩展F是E的子场。注意,在这种情况下,我们将F≥E作为集合,因此多项式p / F也是E的多项式。然后,将第二部分的构造应用于F [X]/,并具有正则单态φ: F→F [X]/。与第一部分一起,这给出了-对于F∩F [X] =∅的域F -其中p∈F [X]\F有根的域扩展E。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field Extensions and Kronecker’s Construction
Summary This is the fourth part of a four-article series containing a Mizar [3], [2], [1] formalization of Kronecker’s construction about roots of polynomials in field extensions, i.e. that for every field F and every polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F there exists a field extension E of F such that p has a root over E. The formalization follows Kronecker’s classical proof using F [X]/ as the desired field extension E [6], [4], [5]. In the first part we show that an irreducible polynomial p ∈ F [X]\F has a root over F [X]/. Note, however, that this statement cannot be true in a rigid formal sense: We do not have F ⊆ F [X]/ < p > as sets, so F is not a subfield of F [X]/, and hence formally p is not even a polynomial over F [X]/ < p >. Consequently, we translate p along the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/ and show that the translated polynomial ϕ (p) has a root over F [X]/. Because F is not a subfield of F [X]/ we construct in the second part the field (E \ ϕF)∪F for a given monomorphism ϕ: F → E and show that this field both is isomorphic to F and includes F as a subfield. In the literature this part of the proof usually consists of saying that “one can identify F with its image ϕF in F [X]/ and therefore consider F as a subfield of F [X]/”. Interestingly, to do so we need to assume that F ∩ E = ∅, in particular Kronecker’s construction can be formalized for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅. Surprisingly, as we show in the third part, this condition is not automatically true for arbitrary fields F : With the exception of ℤ2 we construct for every field F an isomorphic copy F′ of F with F′ ∩ F′ [X] ≠ ∅. We also prove that for Mizar’s representations of ℤn, ℚ and ℝ we have ℤn ∩ ℤn[X] = ∅, ℚ ∩ ℚ[X] = ∅ and ℝ ∩ ℝ[X] = ∅, respectively. In this fourth part we finally define field extensions: E is a field extension of F iff F is a subfield of E. Note, that in this case we have F ⊆ E as sets, and thus a polynomial p over F is also a polynomial over E. We then apply the construction of the second part to F [X]/ with the canonical monomorphism ϕ: F → F [X]/. Together with the first part this gives – for fields F with F ∩ F [X] = ∅ – a field extension E of F in which p ∈ F [X]\F has a root.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Formalized Mathematics
Formalized Mathematics MATHEMATICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Formalized Mathematics is to be issued quarterly and publishes papers which are abstracts of Mizar articles contributed to the Mizar Mathematical Library (MML) - the basis of a knowledge management system for mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信