{"title":"苏菲的秩序观:伊本·阿拉比关于治理的论述","authors":"Doha Tazi Hemida","doi":"10.1093/jis/etad016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article outlines, through a reading of Muḥyī al-Dīn Ibn ʿArabī’s Tadbīrāt al-ilāhiyya fī iṣlāḥ al-mamlaka al-insāniyya (Divine governance in the improvement of the kingdom of the self), a Sufi conception of order that encompasses a discourse on political governance and cuts across the realms of the cosmos, the self, and the polity. It explores the isomorphic relation and mutual ‘folding’ linking the governance of the worldly realm with that of the soul. In contrast to Montesquieu’s scheme of the ‘countervailing passions’, governance at both levels is built on the Sufi notion of ‘struggle against the self (jihād al-nafs)’ and on a theory of the human being as a microcosm. Within Ibn ʿArabī’s system, the political order is not an autonomous domain with its own rationality as developed by early modern European theorists of reason of state. A single rationality guides the governance of the microcosm and the macrocosm.","PeriodicalId":31800,"journal":{"name":"Dirosat Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Sufi Conception of Order: Ibn ʿArabī’s Discourse on Governance\",\"authors\":\"Doha Tazi Hemida\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jis/etad016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article outlines, through a reading of Muḥyī al-Dīn Ibn ʿArabī’s Tadbīrāt al-ilāhiyya fī iṣlāḥ al-mamlaka al-insāniyya (Divine governance in the improvement of the kingdom of the self), a Sufi conception of order that encompasses a discourse on political governance and cuts across the realms of the cosmos, the self, and the polity. It explores the isomorphic relation and mutual ‘folding’ linking the governance of the worldly realm with that of the soul. In contrast to Montesquieu’s scheme of the ‘countervailing passions’, governance at both levels is built on the Sufi notion of ‘struggle against the self (jihād al-nafs)’ and on a theory of the human being as a microcosm. Within Ibn ʿArabī’s system, the political order is not an autonomous domain with its own rationality as developed by early modern European theorists of reason of state. A single rationality guides the governance of the microcosm and the macrocosm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dirosat Journal of Islamic Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dirosat Journal of Islamic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etad016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dirosat Journal of Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etad016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文通过阅读Muḥyī al- d n Ibn - al- arabi的Tadbīrāt al-ilāhiyya f æ iṣlāḥ al-mamlaka al-insāniyya(自我王国改进中的神圣治理),概述了苏菲派的秩序概念,该概念包含了关于政治治理的论述,并跨越了宇宙、自我和政体的领域。它探讨了世俗领域的统治与灵魂的统治之间的同构关系和相互“折叠”。与孟德斯鸠的“反补贴激情”计划相反,这两个层面的治理都是建立在苏菲“与自我斗争”的概念(jihād al-nafs)和人类作为微观世界的理论之上的。在伊本·阿拉比的体系中,政治秩序并不像早期现代欧洲国家理性理论家所发展的那样,是一个具有自身理性的自治领域。单一的理性指导着微观世界和宏观世界的治理。
A Sufi Conception of Order: Ibn ʿArabī’s Discourse on Governance
This article outlines, through a reading of Muḥyī al-Dīn Ibn ʿArabī’s Tadbīrāt al-ilāhiyya fī iṣlāḥ al-mamlaka al-insāniyya (Divine governance in the improvement of the kingdom of the self), a Sufi conception of order that encompasses a discourse on political governance and cuts across the realms of the cosmos, the self, and the polity. It explores the isomorphic relation and mutual ‘folding’ linking the governance of the worldly realm with that of the soul. In contrast to Montesquieu’s scheme of the ‘countervailing passions’, governance at both levels is built on the Sufi notion of ‘struggle against the self (jihād al-nafs)’ and on a theory of the human being as a microcosm. Within Ibn ʿArabī’s system, the political order is not an autonomous domain with its own rationality as developed by early modern European theorists of reason of state. A single rationality guides the governance of the microcosm and the macrocosm.