正在进行的活动,以影响处方质子泵抑制剂在苏格兰国家卫生服务:他们的影响和影响

Pub Date : 2018-11-12 DOI:10.5639/GABIJ.2018.0704.030
B. Godman, A. Kurdi, H. McCabe, S. MacBride-Stewart, Axel Leporowski, S. Hurding, M. Bennie, A. Morton
{"title":"正在进行的活动,以影响处方质子泵抑制剂在苏格兰国家卫生服务:他们的影响和影响","authors":"B. Godman, A. Kurdi, H. McCabe, S. MacBride-Stewart, Axel Leporowski, S. Hurding, M. Bennie, A. Morton","doi":"10.5639/GABIJ.2018.0704.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There has been a considerable increase in the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in recent years due to their effectiveness versus H2 antagonists. This includes reducing GI bleeds in patients at risk. However, there are concerns with their long term use and potential costs. Costs can be reduced with increased prescribing of low cost generic PPIs. Aims: To analyse the influence of multiple demand-side measures in Scotland in recent years to increase the prescribing of low cost generic PPIs as well as encourage the prescribing of lower strength PPIs. Methods: Documenting utilization (mainly items dispensed) and expenditure in Scotland from 2001 to 2017 using health authority databases combined with documenting the multiple initiatives and measures both nationally and regionally. Results: The multiple measures in Scotland ensured high International non-proprietary name prescribing (up to 100% for some PPIs) as well as the prescribing of generic versus patented PPIs, with costs of generic PPIs as low as 8.5% of their pre-patent loss prices. Overall, total expenditure on PPIs in Scotland was 66.7% lower in 2017 at GB£18.83million compared to 2001 levels. This was despite a 3.06-fold increase in PPI utilization during this period. The savings were driven by the increasing use of generic omeprazole and lansoprazole versus patent protected PPIs. There was also a reduction in the prescribing of high strength PPIs during this period. Conclusion: Multiple initiatives in Scotland in recent years have reduced expenditure on PPIs despite appreciably increased utilisation. Multiple initiatives have also helped to reduce the prescribing of higher strength PPIs. This is an exemplar to other countries seeking to enhance their prescribing efficiency","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ongoing activities to influence the prescribing of proton pump inhibitors within the Scottish National Health Service: their effect and implications\",\"authors\":\"B. Godman, A. Kurdi, H. McCabe, S. MacBride-Stewart, Axel Leporowski, S. Hurding, M. Bennie, A. Morton\",\"doi\":\"10.5639/GABIJ.2018.0704.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: There has been a considerable increase in the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in recent years due to their effectiveness versus H2 antagonists. This includes reducing GI bleeds in patients at risk. However, there are concerns with their long term use and potential costs. Costs can be reduced with increased prescribing of low cost generic PPIs. Aims: To analyse the influence of multiple demand-side measures in Scotland in recent years to increase the prescribing of low cost generic PPIs as well as encourage the prescribing of lower strength PPIs. Methods: Documenting utilization (mainly items dispensed) and expenditure in Scotland from 2001 to 2017 using health authority databases combined with documenting the multiple initiatives and measures both nationally and regionally. Results: The multiple measures in Scotland ensured high International non-proprietary name prescribing (up to 100% for some PPIs) as well as the prescribing of generic versus patented PPIs, with costs of generic PPIs as low as 8.5% of their pre-patent loss prices. Overall, total expenditure on PPIs in Scotland was 66.7% lower in 2017 at GB£18.83million compared to 2001 levels. This was despite a 3.06-fold increase in PPI utilization during this period. The savings were driven by the increasing use of generic omeprazole and lansoprazole versus patent protected PPIs. There was also a reduction in the prescribing of high strength PPIs during this period. Conclusion: Multiple initiatives in Scotland in recent years have reduced expenditure on PPIs despite appreciably increased utilisation. Multiple initiatives have also helped to reduce the prescribing of higher strength PPIs. This is an exemplar to other countries seeking to enhance their prescribing efficiency\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5639/GABIJ.2018.0704.030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5639/GABIJ.2018.0704.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

近年来,由于质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)对H2拮抗剂的有效性,质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的使用有了相当大的增加。这包括减少高危患者的胃肠道出血。然而,人们对它们的长期使用和潜在成本感到担忧。增加低成本非专利ppi的处方可以降低成本。目的:分析近年来苏格兰多种需求侧措施对增加低成本非专利ppi处方以及鼓励低强度ppi处方的影响。方法:利用卫生当局数据库,结合国家和地区的多项举措和措施,记录2001年至2017年苏格兰的使用情况(主要是分配的项目)和支出。结果:苏格兰采取的多项措施确保了高国际非专利名称处方(某些ppi高达100%)以及仿制药与专利药的处方,仿制药的成本低至专利前损失价格的8.5%。总体而言,与2001年相比,2017年苏格兰ppi总支出下降了66.7%,为1883万英镑。尽管在此期间PPI利用率增加了3.06倍。与受专利保护的ppi相比,仿制药奥美拉唑和兰索拉唑的使用增加,推动了节省。在此期间,高强度ppi的处方也有所减少。结论:近年来苏格兰的多项举措减少了ppi的支出,尽管利用率明显提高。多项举措也有助于减少高强度ppi的处方。这是寻求提高其处方效率的其他国家的一个范例
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Ongoing activities to influence the prescribing of proton pump inhibitors within the Scottish National Health Service: their effect and implications
Introduction: There has been a considerable increase in the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in recent years due to their effectiveness versus H2 antagonists. This includes reducing GI bleeds in patients at risk. However, there are concerns with their long term use and potential costs. Costs can be reduced with increased prescribing of low cost generic PPIs. Aims: To analyse the influence of multiple demand-side measures in Scotland in recent years to increase the prescribing of low cost generic PPIs as well as encourage the prescribing of lower strength PPIs. Methods: Documenting utilization (mainly items dispensed) and expenditure in Scotland from 2001 to 2017 using health authority databases combined with documenting the multiple initiatives and measures both nationally and regionally. Results: The multiple measures in Scotland ensured high International non-proprietary name prescribing (up to 100% for some PPIs) as well as the prescribing of generic versus patented PPIs, with costs of generic PPIs as low as 8.5% of their pre-patent loss prices. Overall, total expenditure on PPIs in Scotland was 66.7% lower in 2017 at GB£18.83million compared to 2001 levels. This was despite a 3.06-fold increase in PPI utilization during this period. The savings were driven by the increasing use of generic omeprazole and lansoprazole versus patent protected PPIs. There was also a reduction in the prescribing of high strength PPIs during this period. Conclusion: Multiple initiatives in Scotland in recent years have reduced expenditure on PPIs despite appreciably increased utilisation. Multiple initiatives have also helped to reduce the prescribing of higher strength PPIs. This is an exemplar to other countries seeking to enhance their prescribing efficiency
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信