R. Hewitt, E. Bartlett, R. Ganatra, H. Butt, J. Morjaria, V. Kouranos, F. Chua, M. Kokosi, P. Molyneaux, S. Desai, A. Wells, R. Jenkins, E. Renzoni, S. Kemp, A. Devaraj, P. George
{"title":"肺癌筛查为间质性肺疾病的早期诊断和治疗提供了独特的机会","authors":"R. Hewitt, E. Bartlett, R. Ganatra, H. Butt, J. Morjaria, V. Kouranos, F. Chua, M. Kokosi, P. Molyneaux, S. Desai, A. Wells, R. Jenkins, E. Renzoni, S. Kemp, A. Devaraj, P. George","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"P4 Table 1Characteristics of the subjectsCharacteristics Subjects with ILAs on LDCT (n = 39) Age, yr, mean (± SD) 68.8 (± 4.3) Gender, n (%) Female 15 (38.5) Male 24 (61.5) Smoking status, n (%) Current 7 (17.9) Ex 32 (82.1) Respiratory symptoms, n (%) None 19 (48.7) Cough 3 (7.7) Dyspnoea 9 (23.1) Cough & dyspnoea 6 (15.4) N/A 2 (5.1) Physical examination findings, n (%) None 5 (12.8) Crackles 17 (43.6) N/A 17 (43.6) Baseline lung function,%pred, median (range) FEV1,% pred 91 (58 – 130) FVC,% pred 94.8 (65 – 143) TLco,% pred 57.6 (28.4 – 98.8) Kco,% pred 79.5 (36.4 – 94) MDT Diagnosis ILAs, n (%) 8 (20.5) ILD, n (%) IPF 14 (35.9) Smoking-related ILD 6 (15.4) Hypersensitivity pneumonitis 4 (10.3) PPFE 3 (7.7) Sarcoidosis 1 (2.6) Post-COVID ILD 1 (2.6) Vasculitis 1 (2.6) Unclassifiable 1 (2.6) Treatment, n (%) Smoking cessation advice 6 (15.4) Antifibrotic 7 (17.9) Immunomodulatory treatment 2 (5.1) None 23 (59) ResultsILAs of >5% extent on LDCT were identified in 39/1853 (2.1%) subjects screened between August 2018 and April 2021 (table 1). Respiratory symptoms were present in 18/39 (46.1%) and crackles were auscultated in 17 of 22 subjects (77.3%) undergoing physical examination. Past exposure to potential environmental triggers was noted in 21/39 (53.8%). Diagnostic bronchoalveolar lavage was performed in 7/39 (17.9%) and one patient underwent transbronchial lung cryobiopsy. After MDT discussion, ILD was concluded in 31/39 (79.5%) cases, of which 14/31 (45.2%) were diagnosed with IPF. In the IPF subgroup, antifibrotics were initiated in 7/14 (50%) of cases. In those diagnosed with other ILDs, immunomodulatory treatment was initiated in 2/25 (8%) subjects.ConclusionA large proportion of individuals with newly identified ILAs have an abnormal clinical examination and respiratory symptoms, consistent with the widely held suspicion that ILD is underdiagnosed in the community. Lung cancer screening in this demographic provides a unique opportunity to address this unmet health metric. Earlier identification of ILD, specifically IPF, allows institution of antifibrotic therapies proven to modify the natural history of the disease by preserving lung function and extending life. The cost-effectiveness of this approach for ILD screening warrants detailed evaluation.","PeriodicalId":43460,"journal":{"name":"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P4 Lung cancer screening provides a unique opportunity for early diagnosis and management of interstitial lung diseases\",\"authors\":\"R. Hewitt, E. Bartlett, R. Ganatra, H. Butt, J. Morjaria, V. Kouranos, F. Chua, M. Kokosi, P. Molyneaux, S. Desai, A. Wells, R. Jenkins, E. Renzoni, S. Kemp, A. Devaraj, P. George\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"P4 Table 1Characteristics of the subjectsCharacteristics Subjects with ILAs on LDCT (n = 39) Age, yr, mean (± SD) 68.8 (± 4.3) Gender, n (%) Female 15 (38.5) Male 24 (61.5) Smoking status, n (%) Current 7 (17.9) Ex 32 (82.1) Respiratory symptoms, n (%) None 19 (48.7) Cough 3 (7.7) Dyspnoea 9 (23.1) Cough & dyspnoea 6 (15.4) N/A 2 (5.1) Physical examination findings, n (%) None 5 (12.8) Crackles 17 (43.6) N/A 17 (43.6) Baseline lung function,%pred, median (range) FEV1,% pred 91 (58 – 130) FVC,% pred 94.8 (65 – 143) TLco,% pred 57.6 (28.4 – 98.8) Kco,% pred 79.5 (36.4 – 94) MDT Diagnosis ILAs, n (%) 8 (20.5) ILD, n (%) IPF 14 (35.9) Smoking-related ILD 6 (15.4) Hypersensitivity pneumonitis 4 (10.3) PPFE 3 (7.7) Sarcoidosis 1 (2.6) Post-COVID ILD 1 (2.6) Vasculitis 1 (2.6) Unclassifiable 1 (2.6) Treatment, n (%) Smoking cessation advice 6 (15.4) Antifibrotic 7 (17.9) Immunomodulatory treatment 2 (5.1) None 23 (59) ResultsILAs of >5% extent on LDCT were identified in 39/1853 (2.1%) subjects screened between August 2018 and April 2021 (table 1). Respiratory symptoms were present in 18/39 (46.1%) and crackles were auscultated in 17 of 22 subjects (77.3%) undergoing physical examination. Past exposure to potential environmental triggers was noted in 21/39 (53.8%). Diagnostic bronchoalveolar lavage was performed in 7/39 (17.9%) and one patient underwent transbronchial lung cryobiopsy. After MDT discussion, ILD was concluded in 31/39 (79.5%) cases, of which 14/31 (45.2%) were diagnosed with IPF. In the IPF subgroup, antifibrotics were initiated in 7/14 (50%) of cases. In those diagnosed with other ILDs, immunomodulatory treatment was initiated in 2/25 (8%) subjects.ConclusionA large proportion of individuals with newly identified ILAs have an abnormal clinical examination and respiratory symptoms, consistent with the widely held suspicion that ILD is underdiagnosed in the community. Lung cancer screening in this demographic provides a unique opportunity to address this unmet health metric. Earlier identification of ILD, specifically IPF, allows institution of antifibrotic therapies proven to modify the natural history of the disease by preserving lung function and extending life. The cost-effectiveness of this approach for ILD screening warrants detailed evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
P4表1 subjectsCharacteristics学科特点与ILAs LDCT (n = 39)年龄、年,意味着(±SD) 68.8(±4.3)性别,女性15 n(%) 24(61.5)(38.5)男性吸烟状态、当前7 n(%)(17.9)前32(82.1)呼吸道症状,n(%)没有19(48.7)咳嗽3(7.7)呼吸困难9(23.1)咳嗽和呼吸困难6 n / 2(15.4)(5.1)体格检查发现,n(%)没有5 17(43.6)(12.8)发出爆裂声n / 17(43.6)肺功能基线,% pred,中位(范围)FEV1,% pred 91 (58 - 130) FVC,% pred 94.8 (65 - 143) TLco,% pred 57.6 (28.4 - 98.8) Kco,% pred 79.5 (36.4 - 94) MDT诊断ILAs, n (%) 8 (20.5) ILD, n (%) IPF 14(35.9)吸烟相关ILD 6(15.4)超敏感性肺炎4 (10.3)PPFE 3(7.7)结节病1(2.6)新冠肺炎后ILD 1(2.6)血管炎1(2.6)无法分类1(2.6)治疗,n(%)戒烟建议6(15.4)抗纤维化7(17.9)免疫调节治疗2(5.1)无23(59)结果2018年8月至2021年4月期间筛查的39/1853例(2.1%)受试者的LDCT上发现病变程度>5%(表1)。18/39例(46.1%)受试者出现呼吸道症状,22例(77.3%)受试者中有17例(77.3%)接受体检。有21/39(53.8%)指出过去暴露于潜在的环境触发因素。诊断性支气管肺泡灌洗7例(17.9%),1例经支气管肺低温活检。经MDT讨论后,31/39(79.5%)例确诊为ILD,其中14/31(45.2%)诊断为IPF。在IPF亚组中,7/14(50%)的病例开始使用抗纤维化药物。在诊断为其他ild的患者中,有2/25(8%)的受试者接受了免疫调节治疗。结论大部分新确诊的ILD患者临床检查异常,伴有呼吸道症状,这与社区普遍认为ILD未被充分诊断的观点一致。在这一人群中进行肺癌筛查为解决这一未满足的健康指标提供了独特的机会。早期发现ILD,特别是IPF,使得抗纤维化治疗能够通过保持肺功能和延长生命来改变疾病的自然史。这种ILD筛查方法的成本效益值得详细评估。
P4 Lung cancer screening provides a unique opportunity for early diagnosis and management of interstitial lung diseases
P4 Table 1Characteristics of the subjectsCharacteristics Subjects with ILAs on LDCT (n = 39) Age, yr, mean (± SD) 68.8 (± 4.3) Gender, n (%) Female 15 (38.5) Male 24 (61.5) Smoking status, n (%) Current 7 (17.9) Ex 32 (82.1) Respiratory symptoms, n (%) None 19 (48.7) Cough 3 (7.7) Dyspnoea 9 (23.1) Cough & dyspnoea 6 (15.4) N/A 2 (5.1) Physical examination findings, n (%) None 5 (12.8) Crackles 17 (43.6) N/A 17 (43.6) Baseline lung function,%pred, median (range) FEV1,% pred 91 (58 – 130) FVC,% pred 94.8 (65 – 143) TLco,% pred 57.6 (28.4 – 98.8) Kco,% pred 79.5 (36.4 – 94) MDT Diagnosis ILAs, n (%) 8 (20.5) ILD, n (%) IPF 14 (35.9) Smoking-related ILD 6 (15.4) Hypersensitivity pneumonitis 4 (10.3) PPFE 3 (7.7) Sarcoidosis 1 (2.6) Post-COVID ILD 1 (2.6) Vasculitis 1 (2.6) Unclassifiable 1 (2.6) Treatment, n (%) Smoking cessation advice 6 (15.4) Antifibrotic 7 (17.9) Immunomodulatory treatment 2 (5.1) None 23 (59) ResultsILAs of >5% extent on LDCT were identified in 39/1853 (2.1%) subjects screened between August 2018 and April 2021 (table 1). Respiratory symptoms were present in 18/39 (46.1%) and crackles were auscultated in 17 of 22 subjects (77.3%) undergoing physical examination. Past exposure to potential environmental triggers was noted in 21/39 (53.8%). Diagnostic bronchoalveolar lavage was performed in 7/39 (17.9%) and one patient underwent transbronchial lung cryobiopsy. After MDT discussion, ILD was concluded in 31/39 (79.5%) cases, of which 14/31 (45.2%) were diagnosed with IPF. In the IPF subgroup, antifibrotics were initiated in 7/14 (50%) of cases. In those diagnosed with other ILDs, immunomodulatory treatment was initiated in 2/25 (8%) subjects.ConclusionA large proportion of individuals with newly identified ILAs have an abnormal clinical examination and respiratory symptoms, consistent with the widely held suspicion that ILD is underdiagnosed in the community. Lung cancer screening in this demographic provides a unique opportunity to address this unmet health metric. Earlier identification of ILD, specifically IPF, allows institution of antifibrotic therapies proven to modify the natural history of the disease by preserving lung function and extending life. The cost-effectiveness of this approach for ILD screening warrants detailed evaluation.