超越影响因素的影响:设计科学方法

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting

BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200054

D. P. Lacerda, Aline Dresch

{"title":"超越影响因素的影响:设计科学方法","authors":"D. P. Lacerda, Aline Dresch","doi":"10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2003, the following questions were exposed to the scientific community of operations management: “Do we contribute so little because we are irrelevant?” or “Are we irrelevant because we contribute so little?” (Ford, Duncan, Bedeian, Ginter, Rousculp & Adams, 2005, p. 36). It is not a new issue for the scientific community, but it remains today. The criticisms focus on rigor in conducting research at the expense of its usefulness. The literature has portrayed this situation as a trade-off between relevance and rigor. Besides, examples of dysfunctionalities of logic ‘publish or perish’ are also abundant.","PeriodicalId":53636,"journal":{"name":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact beyond impact factor: The Design-science way\",\"authors\":\"D. P. Lacerda, Aline Dresch\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2003, the following questions were exposed to the scientific community of operations management: “Do we contribute so little because we are irrelevant?” or “Are we irrelevant because we contribute so little?” (Ford, Duncan, Bedeian, Ginter, Rousculp & Adams, 2005, p. 36). It is not a new issue for the scientific community, but it remains today. The criticisms focus on rigor in conducting research at the expense of its usefulness. The literature has portrayed this situation as a trade-off between relevance and rigor. Besides, examples of dysfunctionalities of logic ‘publish or perish’ are also abundant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BAR - Brazilian Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

2003年，运营管理科学界提出了以下问题:“我们贡献如此之少，是因为我们无关紧要吗?”或者“我们贡献太少就无关紧要了吗?”(Ford, Duncan, Bedeian, Ginter, Rousculp & Adams, 2005，第36页)。对于科学界来说，这不是一个新问题，但它今天仍然存在。批评的焦点集中在以牺牲其实用性为代价进行研究的严谨性上。文献将这种情况描述为相关性和严谨性之间的权衡。此外，逻辑功能失调的例子“发表或消亡”也很多。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Impact beyond impact factor: The Design-science way

In 2003, the following questions were exposed to the scientific community of operations management: “Do we contribute so little because we are irrelevant?” or “Are we irrelevant because we contribute so little?” (Ford, Duncan, Bedeian, Ginter, Rousculp & Adams, 2005, p. 36). It is not a new issue for the scientific community, but it remains today. The criticisms focus on rigor in conducting research at the expense of its usefulness. The literature has portrayed this situation as a trade-off between relevance and rigor. Besides, examples of dysfunctionalities of logic ‘publish or perish’ are also abundant.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

BAR - Brazilian Administration Review Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Launched in 2004, BAR has an international scope in terms of topics of interest, target audience, and editorial boards. It is an A2-journal according to the Brazilian classification Qualis/Capes, which is thus a strong signal about the quality of published works and about the transparency of the editorial process. BAR follows the editorial principles available in document Best Practices of Scientific Publication, an initiative championed by the Brazilian Academy of Management (ANPAD) that seeks to assist journals to achieve high scholarly standards and enhance their impact as sources for theoretical and applied research. Furthermore, since 2013, BAR is a member of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), what is another signal of efforts made towards adhering to the most rigorous ethical principles in academic publication.