《亚洲园林大典》

IF 0.4 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Xiaoxuan Lu
{"title":"《亚洲园林大典》","authors":"Xiaoxuan Lu","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2021.2046817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heike Rahmann from RMIT University, The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture offers fresh perspectives in the field of landscape architecture, hitherto dominated by North American and European influences, by addressing the question of ‘what it means to design, do business, and think about nature, space, and urbanism with an Asian sensibility’ (p. 12). In taking on this challenging task, Walliss and Rahmann set out to document an emerging contemporary landscape practice in Asia characterized by diversity and audacity. Notably, this book is not a national catalogue or record of ‘Asian’ design projects that define knowledge and design approaches by geographies. Instead, the book represents Asia as a milieu of manifold and overlapping framings and ideas under the moniker ‘Asia as Method’ (p. 12). The remainder of this review highlights the multiplicity of ‘relationships’ that guided the development, structure and framing of the book, and signposts potential directions for further investigation. The introduction includes a revealing behind-the-scenes story about the development of the book itself, offering an insightful perspective of the relationship between Australia and Asia as illustrated by the relationship between this book and a previous publication and workshop presented by the editorial team. The current book, as Walliss and Rahmann point out, is inspired by and based on their 2017 collaboration on a themed edition of Landscape Architecture Australia (LAA) entitled ‘Embracing the Asian Century’, born out of a critical moment when the Australian 2016 Census revealed that for the first time since colonization, the majority of overseas-born Australians came from Asia rather than Europe and that Australia is no longer ‘a neutral Anglo country in the region’ and ‘looks more like Asia than ever before’. The themed edition investigated how Australia’s changing identity and relationship with Asia influenced its local landscape architectural profession, presenting the topic in three parts, ‘Asia in Australia’, ‘Practising in Asia’ and ‘An Asian practice’. It is fair to say that it inclined towards an Australia-centric understanding of ‘Asian’ and how the ‘Asian Century’ is influencing education, practice and discourse in and beyond Australia. The themed edition of LAA was a critical catalyst for the more ambitious edited book The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture published three years later. While the former examined Asia in the context of its changing relationship with an increasingly Euro-Asian Australia, the latter emphasizes a new collectiveness of ‘Asia’ and the use of ‘Big’ in the book title celebrates the complexity and diversity of ideas about Asian landscape architecture. The anecdote about the workshop that laid the foundations for the book and spurred Walliss and Rahmann to expand their network of Asian designers and academics, hints at the uniqueness of doing business in an Asian context. The duo, with no funding confirmed, expressed their desire to run a workshop in Asia in a twenty-minute chance meeting with Kongjian Yu in Melbourne in 2018. As the story is told, Kongjian generously offered to host a two-day workshop in Beijing in early 2019, prompting a star cast of practitioners and academic leaders from all over Asia to accept the invitation and attend the self-funded workshop, without any book contract existing at that time. Reflecting on this critical moment of the development of the book, Walliss and Rahmann cite an analogy used by their colleague: ‘In Asia, someone might offer an invitation to get in a boat. . . . The critical point is the invitation, and its potential to develop into something, which is unknown at the point of embarking. . . . Your trip might be over quickly, or it could end up being a life-long connection’ (p. 11). The book has finally materialized, almost two years after the workshop in Beijing. The way the contents are structured reflects the relationships between the many different countries and regions in Asia, and the diverse categorization and conceptualization of the projects under discussion. The book includes textual and visual material relating to more than eighty design projects that are contextualized and/or reflected on by essays and commentary from twenty authors including academics and practitioners from across Asia and Australia. The book cover hints at the diversity and complexity of Asia and the profession in the region, featuring translations of ‘landscape architecture’ in simplified Chinese, traditional Chinese, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Malay and Thai. However, the editors readily admit that the projects featured in the book hail predominantly from Japan, Korea, Heike Rahmann and Jillian Walliss (eds.) The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"60 1","pages":"98 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxuan Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18626033.2021.2046817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Heike Rahmann from RMIT University, The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture offers fresh perspectives in the field of landscape architecture, hitherto dominated by North American and European influences, by addressing the question of ‘what it means to design, do business, and think about nature, space, and urbanism with an Asian sensibility’ (p. 12). In taking on this challenging task, Walliss and Rahmann set out to document an emerging contemporary landscape practice in Asia characterized by diversity and audacity. Notably, this book is not a national catalogue or record of ‘Asian’ design projects that define knowledge and design approaches by geographies. Instead, the book represents Asia as a milieu of manifold and overlapping framings and ideas under the moniker ‘Asia as Method’ (p. 12). The remainder of this review highlights the multiplicity of ‘relationships’ that guided the development, structure and framing of the book, and signposts potential directions for further investigation. The introduction includes a revealing behind-the-scenes story about the development of the book itself, offering an insightful perspective of the relationship between Australia and Asia as illustrated by the relationship between this book and a previous publication and workshop presented by the editorial team. The current book, as Walliss and Rahmann point out, is inspired by and based on their 2017 collaboration on a themed edition of Landscape Architecture Australia (LAA) entitled ‘Embracing the Asian Century’, born out of a critical moment when the Australian 2016 Census revealed that for the first time since colonization, the majority of overseas-born Australians came from Asia rather than Europe and that Australia is no longer ‘a neutral Anglo country in the region’ and ‘looks more like Asia than ever before’. The themed edition investigated how Australia’s changing identity and relationship with Asia influenced its local landscape architectural profession, presenting the topic in three parts, ‘Asia in Australia’, ‘Practising in Asia’ and ‘An Asian practice’. It is fair to say that it inclined towards an Australia-centric understanding of ‘Asian’ and how the ‘Asian Century’ is influencing education, practice and discourse in and beyond Australia. The themed edition of LAA was a critical catalyst for the more ambitious edited book The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture published three years later. While the former examined Asia in the context of its changing relationship with an increasingly Euro-Asian Australia, the latter emphasizes a new collectiveness of ‘Asia’ and the use of ‘Big’ in the book title celebrates the complexity and diversity of ideas about Asian landscape architecture. The anecdote about the workshop that laid the foundations for the book and spurred Walliss and Rahmann to expand their network of Asian designers and academics, hints at the uniqueness of doing business in an Asian context. The duo, with no funding confirmed, expressed their desire to run a workshop in Asia in a twenty-minute chance meeting with Kongjian Yu in Melbourne in 2018. As the story is told, Kongjian generously offered to host a two-day workshop in Beijing in early 2019, prompting a star cast of practitioners and academic leaders from all over Asia to accept the invitation and attend the self-funded workshop, without any book contract existing at that time. Reflecting on this critical moment of the development of the book, Walliss and Rahmann cite an analogy used by their colleague: ‘In Asia, someone might offer an invitation to get in a boat. . . . The critical point is the invitation, and its potential to develop into something, which is unknown at the point of embarking. . . . Your trip might be over quickly, or it could end up being a life-long connection’ (p. 11). The book has finally materialized, almost two years after the workshop in Beijing. The way the contents are structured reflects the relationships between the many different countries and regions in Asia, and the diverse categorization and conceptualization of the projects under discussion. The book includes textual and visual material relating to more than eighty design projects that are contextualized and/or reflected on by essays and commentary from twenty authors including academics and practitioners from across Asia and Australia. The book cover hints at the diversity and complexity of Asia and the profession in the region, featuring translations of ‘landscape architecture’ in simplified Chinese, traditional Chinese, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Malay and Thai. However, the editors readily admit that the projects featured in the book hail predominantly from Japan, Korea, Heike Rahmann and Jillian Walliss (eds.) The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture\",\"PeriodicalId\":43606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Landscape Architecture\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"98 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Landscape Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2021.2046817\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2021.2046817","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自RMIT大学的Heike Rahmann的《亚洲景观设计大书》为迄今为止受北美和欧洲影响的景观设计领域提供了新的视角,通过解决“具有亚洲感性的设计,经营和思考自然,空间和城市主义意味着什么”的问题(第12页)。在承担这一具有挑战性的任务时,沃利斯和拉赫曼开始记录亚洲新兴的当代景观实践,其特点是多样性和大胆。值得注意的是,这本书并不是按地域定义知识和设计方法的“亚洲”设计项目的国家目录或记录。相反,这本书以“作为方法的亚洲”(第12页)的名义,将亚洲描绘成一个具有多种重叠框架和思想的环境。这篇评论的其余部分强调了指导这本书的发展、结构和框架的“关系”的多样性,并指出了进一步研究的潜在方向。引言包括揭示了这本书本身发展的幕后故事,提供了澳大利亚和亚洲关系的深刻视角,如这本书与编辑团队之前出版的出版物和研讨会之间的关系所说明的那样。正如沃利斯和拉赫曼所指出的那样,目前这本书的灵感来自于他们2017年在澳大利亚景观建筑(LAA)主题版上的合作,题为“拥抱亚洲世纪”,诞生于2016年澳大利亚人口普查的关键时刻,这是自殖民以来第一次,大多数海外出生的澳大利亚人来自亚洲,而不是欧洲,澳大利亚不再是“该地区一个中立的盎格鲁国家”,“比以往任何时候都更像亚洲”。主题版调查了澳大利亚不断变化的身份和与亚洲的关系如何影响其当地的景观设计专业,将主题分为三个部分,“澳大利亚的亚洲”,“亚洲实践”和“亚洲实践”。公平地说,它倾向于以澳大利亚为中心理解“亚洲”,以及“亚洲世纪”如何影响澳大利亚内外的教育、实践和话语。LAA的主题版是三年后出版的更具雄心的《亚洲景观设计大书》的关键催化剂。前者考察了亚洲与日益欧亚化的澳大利亚之间不断变化的关系,而后者强调了“亚洲”的新集体性,书名中“大”的使用颂扬了亚洲景观建筑理念的复杂性和多样性。研讨会为这本书奠定了基础,并促使沃利斯和拉赫曼扩大他们的亚洲设计师和学者网络,这一轶事暗示了在亚洲背景下做生意的独特性。2018年,两人在墨尔本与俞孔坚(Kongjian Yu)的一次20分钟的偶然会面中,表达了他们在亚洲举办研讨会的愿望,当时资金还没有得到确认。据说,2019年初,孔健慷慨地提出在北京举办为期两天的研讨会,吸引了来自亚洲各地的明星从业者和学术领袖接受邀请,参加了自费研讨会,当时没有任何图书合同。在反思这本书发展的关键时刻,沃利斯和拉赫曼引用了他们同事的一个比喻:“在亚洲,有人可能会邀请你上船. . . .关键的一点是邀请,以及它发展成某种东西的潜力,这在出发时是未知的. . . .你的旅行可能很快就结束了,也可能成为一段终生的感情。在北京的研讨会结束近两年后,这本书终于实现了。内容的结构方式反映了亚洲许多不同国家和地区之间的关系,以及正在讨论的项目的多样化分类和概念化。这本书包含了与80多个设计项目相关的文本和视觉材料,这些项目由20位作者(包括来自亚洲和澳大利亚的学者和实践者)的文章和评论进行语境化和/或反思。这本书的封面暗示了亚洲的多样性和复杂性,以及该地区的专业,包括简体中文、繁体中文、印尼语、日语、韩语、马来语和泰语的“景观建筑”翻译。然而,编辑们欣然承认,书中的项目主要来自日本、韩国、Heike Rahmann和Jillian Walliss(编者)。《亚洲园林大典》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture
Heike Rahmann from RMIT University, The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture offers fresh perspectives in the field of landscape architecture, hitherto dominated by North American and European influences, by addressing the question of ‘what it means to design, do business, and think about nature, space, and urbanism with an Asian sensibility’ (p. 12). In taking on this challenging task, Walliss and Rahmann set out to document an emerging contemporary landscape practice in Asia characterized by diversity and audacity. Notably, this book is not a national catalogue or record of ‘Asian’ design projects that define knowledge and design approaches by geographies. Instead, the book represents Asia as a milieu of manifold and overlapping framings and ideas under the moniker ‘Asia as Method’ (p. 12). The remainder of this review highlights the multiplicity of ‘relationships’ that guided the development, structure and framing of the book, and signposts potential directions for further investigation. The introduction includes a revealing behind-the-scenes story about the development of the book itself, offering an insightful perspective of the relationship between Australia and Asia as illustrated by the relationship between this book and a previous publication and workshop presented by the editorial team. The current book, as Walliss and Rahmann point out, is inspired by and based on their 2017 collaboration on a themed edition of Landscape Architecture Australia (LAA) entitled ‘Embracing the Asian Century’, born out of a critical moment when the Australian 2016 Census revealed that for the first time since colonization, the majority of overseas-born Australians came from Asia rather than Europe and that Australia is no longer ‘a neutral Anglo country in the region’ and ‘looks more like Asia than ever before’. The themed edition investigated how Australia’s changing identity and relationship with Asia influenced its local landscape architectural profession, presenting the topic in three parts, ‘Asia in Australia’, ‘Practising in Asia’ and ‘An Asian practice’. It is fair to say that it inclined towards an Australia-centric understanding of ‘Asian’ and how the ‘Asian Century’ is influencing education, practice and discourse in and beyond Australia. The themed edition of LAA was a critical catalyst for the more ambitious edited book The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture published three years later. While the former examined Asia in the context of its changing relationship with an increasingly Euro-Asian Australia, the latter emphasizes a new collectiveness of ‘Asia’ and the use of ‘Big’ in the book title celebrates the complexity and diversity of ideas about Asian landscape architecture. The anecdote about the workshop that laid the foundations for the book and spurred Walliss and Rahmann to expand their network of Asian designers and academics, hints at the uniqueness of doing business in an Asian context. The duo, with no funding confirmed, expressed their desire to run a workshop in Asia in a twenty-minute chance meeting with Kongjian Yu in Melbourne in 2018. As the story is told, Kongjian generously offered to host a two-day workshop in Beijing in early 2019, prompting a star cast of practitioners and academic leaders from all over Asia to accept the invitation and attend the self-funded workshop, without any book contract existing at that time. Reflecting on this critical moment of the development of the book, Walliss and Rahmann cite an analogy used by their colleague: ‘In Asia, someone might offer an invitation to get in a boat. . . . The critical point is the invitation, and its potential to develop into something, which is unknown at the point of embarking. . . . Your trip might be over quickly, or it could end up being a life-long connection’ (p. 11). The book has finally materialized, almost two years after the workshop in Beijing. The way the contents are structured reflects the relationships between the many different countries and regions in Asia, and the diverse categorization and conceptualization of the projects under discussion. The book includes textual and visual material relating to more than eighty design projects that are contextualized and/or reflected on by essays and commentary from twenty authors including academics and practitioners from across Asia and Australia. The book cover hints at the diversity and complexity of Asia and the profession in the region, featuring translations of ‘landscape architecture’ in simplified Chinese, traditional Chinese, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Malay and Thai. However, the editors readily admit that the projects featured in the book hail predominantly from Japan, Korea, Heike Rahmann and Jillian Walliss (eds.) The Big Asian Book of Landscape Architecture
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: JoLA is the academic Journal of the European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools (ECLAS), established in 2006. It is published three times a year. JoLA aims to support, stimulate, and extend scholarly debate in Landscape Architecture and related fields. It also gives space to the reflective practitioner and to design research. The journal welcomes articles addressing any aspect of Landscape Architecture, to cultivate the diverse identity of the discipline. JoLA is internationally oriented and seeks to both draw in and contribute to global perspectives through its four key sections: the ‘Articles’ section features both academic scholarship and research related to professional practice; the ‘Under the Sky’ section fosters research based on critical analysis and interpretation of built projects; the ‘Thinking Eye’ section presents research based on thoughtful experimentation in visual methodologies and media; the ‘Review’ section presents critical reflection on recent literature, conferences and/or exhibitions relevant to Landscape Architecture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信