巴比伦的第欧根尼论神是谁:aËtius 1.7.8重新考虑曼斯菲尔德-鲁尼亚

The Classical Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S000983882200057X

C. Vassallo

{"title":"巴比伦的第欧根尼论神是谁:aËtius 1.7.8重新考虑曼斯菲尔德-鲁尼亚","authors":"C. Vassallo","doi":"10.1017/S000983882200057X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In Aëtius 1.7.8 Mansfeld–Runia, Diogenes, Cleanthes and Oenopides are said to have maintained that the deity is the world-soul. However, the identity of the Diogenes whom the doxographer mentions here has long been a matter of scholarly dispute. In response to attempts to ascribe the doxa to Diogenes of Apollonia, this paper reassesses old arguments and proposes new considerations to argue that a fundamental aspect of Diogenes of Babylon's theology is at stake here.","PeriodicalId":22560,"journal":{"name":"The Classical Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIOGENES OF BABYLON ON WHO THE DEITY IS: AËTIUS 1.7.8 MANSFELD–RUNIA RECONSIDERED\",\"authors\":\"C. Vassallo\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S000983882200057X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In Aëtius 1.7.8 Mansfeld–Runia, Diogenes, Cleanthes and Oenopides are said to have maintained that the deity is the world-soul. However, the identity of the Diogenes whom the doxographer mentions here has long been a matter of scholarly dispute. In response to attempts to ascribe the doxa to Diogenes of Apollonia, this paper reassesses old arguments and proposes new considerations to argue that a fundamental aspect of Diogenes of Babylon's theology is at stake here.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Classical Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Classical Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S000983882200057X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Classical Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S000983882200057X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在Aëtius 1.7.8中，曼斯菲尔德-鲁尼亚、第欧根尼、克里安提斯和欧诺匹德斯认为神是世界的灵魂。然而，作者在这里提到的第欧根尼的身份长期以来一直是一个学术争议的问题。为了回应将这个信条归咎于阿波罗尼亚的第欧根尼的尝试，本文重新评估了旧的论点，并提出了新的考虑，认为巴比伦的第欧根尼的神学的一个基本方面在这里受到威胁。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

DIOGENES OF BABYLON ON WHO THE DEITY IS: AËTIUS 1.7.8 MANSFELD–RUNIA RECONSIDERED

Abstract In Aëtius 1.7.8 Mansfeld–Runia, Diogenes, Cleanthes and Oenopides are said to have maintained that the deity is the world-soul. However, the identity of the Diogenes whom the doxographer mentions here has long been a matter of scholarly dispute. In response to attempts to ascribe the doxa to Diogenes of Apollonia, this paper reassesses old arguments and proposes new considerations to argue that a fundamental aspect of Diogenes of Babylon's theology is at stake here.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Classical Quarterly

自引率

0.00%

发文量