结合可穿戴加速度计和生理数据的活动和能量消耗估计

M. Altini, J. Penders, R. Vullers, O. Amft
{"title":"结合可穿戴加速度计和生理数据的活动和能量消耗估计","authors":"M. Altini, J. Penders, R. Vullers, O. Amft","doi":"10.1145/2534088.2534106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical Activity (PA) is one of the most important determinants of health. Wearable sensors have great potential for accurate assessment of PA (activity type and Energy Expenditure (EE)) in daily life. In this paper we investigate the benefit of multiple physiological signals (Heart Rate (HR), respiration rate, Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), skin humidity) as well as accelerometer (ACC) data from two locations (wrist - combining ACC, GSR and skin humidity - and chest - combining ACC and HR) on PA type and EE estimation. We implemented single regression, activity recognition and activity-specific EE models on data collected from 16 subjects, while performing a set of PAs, grouped into six clusters (lying, sedentary, dynamic, walking, biking and running). Our results show that combining ACC and physiological signals improves performance for activity recognition (by 2 and 8% for the chest and wrist) and EE (by 36 - chest - and 35% - wrist - for single regression models, and by 18 - chest - and 46% - wrist - for activity-specific models). Physiological signals other than HR showed a coarser relation with level of physical exertion, resulting in being better predictors of activity cluster type and separation between inactivity and activity than EE, due to the weak correlation to EE within an activity cluster.","PeriodicalId":91386,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Wireless Health ... [electronic resource]. Wireless Health (Conference)","volume":"24 1","pages":"1:1-1:8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining wearable accelerometer and physiological data for activity and energy expenditure estimation\",\"authors\":\"M. Altini, J. Penders, R. Vullers, O. Amft\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2534088.2534106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physical Activity (PA) is one of the most important determinants of health. Wearable sensors have great potential for accurate assessment of PA (activity type and Energy Expenditure (EE)) in daily life. In this paper we investigate the benefit of multiple physiological signals (Heart Rate (HR), respiration rate, Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), skin humidity) as well as accelerometer (ACC) data from two locations (wrist - combining ACC, GSR and skin humidity - and chest - combining ACC and HR) on PA type and EE estimation. We implemented single regression, activity recognition and activity-specific EE models on data collected from 16 subjects, while performing a set of PAs, grouped into six clusters (lying, sedentary, dynamic, walking, biking and running). Our results show that combining ACC and physiological signals improves performance for activity recognition (by 2 and 8% for the chest and wrist) and EE (by 36 - chest - and 35% - wrist - for single regression models, and by 18 - chest - and 46% - wrist - for activity-specific models). Physiological signals other than HR showed a coarser relation with level of physical exertion, resulting in being better predictors of activity cluster type and separation between inactivity and activity than EE, due to the weak correlation to EE within an activity cluster.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Wireless Health ... [electronic resource]. Wireless Health (Conference)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1:1-1:8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Wireless Health ... [electronic resource]. Wireless Health (Conference)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2534088.2534106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Wireless Health ... [electronic resource]. Wireless Health (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2534088.2534106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

身体活动(PA)是健康最重要的决定因素之一。可穿戴传感器在准确评估日常生活中的活动类型和能量消耗(EE)方面具有很大的潜力。在本文中,我们研究了多个生理信号(心率(HR)、呼吸速率、皮肤电反应(GSR)、皮肤湿度)以及两个位置(手腕结合ACC、GSR和皮肤湿度以及胸部结合ACC和HR)的加速度计(ACC)数据对PA类型和EE估计的好处。我们对从16名受试者收集的数据实施了单一回归、活动识别和特定活动的情感表达模型,同时执行了一组pa,分为六组(躺着、久坐、动态、步行、骑自行车和跑步)。我们的研究结果表明,ACC和生理信号的结合提高了活动识别的性能(胸部和手腕分别提高了2%和8%)和情感表达(单一回归模型中胸部和手腕分别提高了36%和35%,活动特定模型中胸部和手腕分别提高了18%和46%)。HR以外的生理信号与体力消耗水平的关系较粗,由于与活动集群内的情感表达相关性较弱,因此比情感表达更能预测活动集群类型和不活动与活动之间的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining wearable accelerometer and physiological data for activity and energy expenditure estimation
Physical Activity (PA) is one of the most important determinants of health. Wearable sensors have great potential for accurate assessment of PA (activity type and Energy Expenditure (EE)) in daily life. In this paper we investigate the benefit of multiple physiological signals (Heart Rate (HR), respiration rate, Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), skin humidity) as well as accelerometer (ACC) data from two locations (wrist - combining ACC, GSR and skin humidity - and chest - combining ACC and HR) on PA type and EE estimation. We implemented single regression, activity recognition and activity-specific EE models on data collected from 16 subjects, while performing a set of PAs, grouped into six clusters (lying, sedentary, dynamic, walking, biking and running). Our results show that combining ACC and physiological signals improves performance for activity recognition (by 2 and 8% for the chest and wrist) and EE (by 36 - chest - and 35% - wrist - for single regression models, and by 18 - chest - and 46% - wrist - for activity-specific models). Physiological signals other than HR showed a coarser relation with level of physical exertion, resulting in being better predictors of activity cluster type and separation between inactivity and activity than EE, due to the weak correlation to EE within an activity cluster.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信