胸腺素α1免疫调节治疗败血症:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Wan-Jie Gu, X. Gu, Zhengliang Ma
{"title":"胸腺素α1免疫调节治疗败血症:随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Wan-Jie Gu, X. Gu, Zhengliang Ma","doi":"10.24015/japm.2017.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Preclinical studies suggest that thymosin α1 has immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory properties in various septic models. However, whether these effects will transform into improved outcomes in humans with sepsis remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to define the role of thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy in sepsis.Methods: We searched Medline and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy compared with standard care for adults with sepsis. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.Results: Nine articles with 10 trials involving 1425 patients were included. Compared with standard care, thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy was associated with a significant 31% relative risk reduction of 28-day mortality (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80, P<0.001), with no statistical heterogeneity (I2=0%). The benefit was confirmed by trial sequential analysis and was consistent across all subgroup analyses. For secondary outcomes, thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy was associated with shorter length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, increased T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+), and decreased inflammatory mediators (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6).Conclusions: Thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy decreases 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. The benefit might be attributed to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. However, caution should be used to translate these findings to clinical practice, because current evidence is potentially subject to bias. Hence, high-quality and adequately powered trials are still warranted.  Citation: Wan-Jie Gu, Xiao-Ping Gu, Zheng-Liang Ma. Thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy for sepsis: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth Perioper Med 2017; x: x-x. doi:10.24015/JAPM.2017.0017This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.","PeriodicalId":15018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thymosin α1-Based Immunomodulatory Therapy for Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Wan-Jie Gu, X. Gu, Zhengliang Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.24015/japm.2017.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Preclinical studies suggest that thymosin α1 has immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory properties in various septic models. However, whether these effects will transform into improved outcomes in humans with sepsis remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to define the role of thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy in sepsis.Methods: We searched Medline and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy compared with standard care for adults with sepsis. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.Results: Nine articles with 10 trials involving 1425 patients were included. Compared with standard care, thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy was associated with a significant 31% relative risk reduction of 28-day mortality (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80, P<0.001), with no statistical heterogeneity (I2=0%). The benefit was confirmed by trial sequential analysis and was consistent across all subgroup analyses. For secondary outcomes, thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy was associated with shorter length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, increased T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+), and decreased inflammatory mediators (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6).Conclusions: Thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy decreases 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. The benefit might be attributed to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. However, caution should be used to translate these findings to clinical practice, because current evidence is potentially subject to bias. Hence, high-quality and adequately powered trials are still warranted.  Citation: Wan-Jie Gu, Xiao-Ping Gu, Zheng-Liang Ma. Thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy for sepsis: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth Perioper Med 2017; x: x-x. doi:10.24015/JAPM.2017.0017This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24015/japm.2017.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24015/japm.2017.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:临床前研究表明胸腺素α1在多种脓毒症模型中具有免疫调节和抗炎作用。然而,这些影响是否会转化为人类败血症患者的改善结果仍不清楚。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定胸腺素α1为基础的免疫调节治疗在败血症中的作用。方法:我们检索Medline和Embase,以确定评估胸腺素α1免疫调节治疗与标准治疗对成人脓毒症疗效的随机对照试验。我们使用随机效应模型以95%置信区间(ci)计算风险比(rr)。主要终点为28天死亡率。结果:纳入9篇文章,10项试验,共1425例患者。与标准治疗相比,胸腺素α1免疫调节治疗与28天死亡率相对风险降低31%相关(RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80, P<0.001),无统计学异质性(I2=0%)。试验序列分析证实了这种益处,并且在所有亚组分析中是一致的。对于次要结果,胸腺素α1免疫调节治疗与重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和机械通气时间缩短,T淋巴细胞亚群(CD3+, CD4+和CD4+/CD8+)增加,炎症介质(肿瘤坏死因子-α,白细胞介素-1β和白细胞介素-6)减少相关。结论:胸腺素α1免疫调节治疗可降低败血症患者28天死亡率。这种益处可能归因于其免疫调节和抗炎作用。然而,在将这些发现转化为临床实践时应谨慎,因为目前的证据可能存在偏见。因此,高质量和充分支持的试验仍然是必要的。引用本文:顾万杰,顾小平,马正良。胸腺素α1免疫调节治疗败血症:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。中华外科杂志2017;x: x。doi:10.24015/ japm .2017.0017这是一篇开放获取的文章,由Evidence Based Communications (EBC)发表。本作品遵循知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议,允许以任何媒介或格式出于任何合法目的不受限制地使用、分发和复制。要查看此许可证的副本,请访问http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thymosin α1-Based Immunomodulatory Therapy for Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background: Preclinical studies suggest that thymosin α1 has immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory properties in various septic models. However, whether these effects will transform into improved outcomes in humans with sepsis remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to define the role of thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy in sepsis.Methods: We searched Medline and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials that assessed the effect of thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy compared with standard care for adults with sepsis. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.Results: Nine articles with 10 trials involving 1425 patients were included. Compared with standard care, thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy was associated with a significant 31% relative risk reduction of 28-day mortality (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.80, P<0.001), with no statistical heterogeneity (I2=0%). The benefit was confirmed by trial sequential analysis and was consistent across all subgroup analyses. For secondary outcomes, thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy was associated with shorter length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, increased T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+), and decreased inflammatory mediators (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-6).Conclusions: Thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy decreases 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. The benefit might be attributed to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects. However, caution should be used to translate these findings to clinical practice, because current evidence is potentially subject to bias. Hence, high-quality and adequately powered trials are still warranted.  Citation: Wan-Jie Gu, Xiao-Ping Gu, Zheng-Liang Ma. Thymosin α1-based immunomodulatory therapy for sepsis: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth Perioper Med 2017; x: x-x. doi:10.24015/JAPM.2017.0017This is an open-access article, published by Evidence Based Communications (EBC). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format for any lawful purpose. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信