李昌:一种受影响的中国直播民族志

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Gehao Zhang
{"title":"李昌:一种受影响的中国直播民族志","authors":"Gehao Zhang","doi":"10.1163/22142312-12340130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n I tracked one Chinese livestreaming platform Douyu from its emergence as experimental subsidiary of a Video on Demand platform in 2013 to its status as an ordinary medium of mass entertainment in 2018. This affect-inflected ethnography is written based on participant observation of three channels on Douyu as I exhibit the microcontexts of each channel in chronicles of affective events, long pauses of silence, repetitive and incoherent dialogues, asymmetrical debates, and sporadic moments of emotional meltdown. This ethnographic writing is a contact zone, a provocation, and, by proxy, a dialogue between academic theories (especially from television studies), user practices, and my informants’ own attempts at theorising how and what livestream feels and means for them.","PeriodicalId":52237,"journal":{"name":"Asiascape: Digital Asia","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Richang: An Affect-Inflected Ethnography of Chinese Livestreams\",\"authors\":\"Gehao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22142312-12340130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n I tracked one Chinese livestreaming platform Douyu from its emergence as experimental subsidiary of a Video on Demand platform in 2013 to its status as an ordinary medium of mass entertainment in 2018. This affect-inflected ethnography is written based on participant observation of three channels on Douyu as I exhibit the microcontexts of each channel in chronicles of affective events, long pauses of silence, repetitive and incoherent dialogues, asymmetrical debates, and sporadic moments of emotional meltdown. This ethnographic writing is a contact zone, a provocation, and, by proxy, a dialogue between academic theories (especially from television studies), user practices, and my informants’ own attempts at theorising how and what livestream feels and means for them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asiascape: Digital Asia\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asiascape: Digital Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiascape: Digital Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我跟踪了中国直播平台斗鱼,从2013年作为视频点播平台的实验性子公司出现,到2018年成为普通大众娱乐媒体。这本受情感影响的民族志是基于对斗鱼上三个频道的参与观察而写的,我展示了每个频道在情感事件编年史中的微观背景,长时间的沉默,重复和不连贯的对话,不对称的辩论,以及偶尔的情感崩溃时刻。这种民族志写作是一个接触区,是一种挑衅,也是学术理论(尤其是来自电视研究的理论)、用户实践和我的线人自己的尝试之间的对话,他们试图将直播对他们的感觉和意义理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Richang: An Affect-Inflected Ethnography of Chinese Livestreams
I tracked one Chinese livestreaming platform Douyu from its emergence as experimental subsidiary of a Video on Demand platform in 2013 to its status as an ordinary medium of mass entertainment in 2018. This affect-inflected ethnography is written based on participant observation of three channels on Douyu as I exhibit the microcontexts of each channel in chronicles of affective events, long pauses of silence, repetitive and incoherent dialogues, asymmetrical debates, and sporadic moments of emotional meltdown. This ethnographic writing is a contact zone, a provocation, and, by proxy, a dialogue between academic theories (especially from television studies), user practices, and my informants’ own attempts at theorising how and what livestream feels and means for them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asiascape: Digital Asia
Asiascape: Digital Asia Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信