{"title":"伦理的神学伪装:重新定义创世记22章的犹太意义","authors":"Ethan Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/00209643221134971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the influence of Christian philosopher Søren Kierkegaard, modern Jewish readings of the Aqedah, or “binding of Isaac” (Gen 22:1–19), tend to understand the story in terms of a conflict between divine command and human ethics. Drawing on both biblical and extrabiblical evidence, this article argues that the conflict in the story is more plausibly understood as one between divine command and covenantal promise. Despite not being about theological ethics in the usual sense, this interpretation may still have Jewish meaning if we situate it in the realm of theodicy.","PeriodicalId":44542,"journal":{"name":"INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND THEOLOGY","volume":"7 1","pages":"40 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Theological Pretension of the Ethical: Reframing the Jewish Significance of Genesis 22\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00209643221134971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the influence of Christian philosopher Søren Kierkegaard, modern Jewish readings of the Aqedah, or “binding of Isaac” (Gen 22:1–19), tend to understand the story in terms of a conflict between divine command and human ethics. Drawing on both biblical and extrabiblical evidence, this article argues that the conflict in the story is more plausibly understood as one between divine command and covenantal promise. Despite not being about theological ethics in the usual sense, this interpretation may still have Jewish meaning if we situate it in the realm of theodicy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND THEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND THEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00209643221134971\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00209643221134971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Theological Pretension of the Ethical: Reframing the Jewish Significance of Genesis 22
Due to the influence of Christian philosopher Søren Kierkegaard, modern Jewish readings of the Aqedah, or “binding of Isaac” (Gen 22:1–19), tend to understand the story in terms of a conflict between divine command and human ethics. Drawing on both biblical and extrabiblical evidence, this article argues that the conflict in the story is more plausibly understood as one between divine command and covenantal promise. Despite not being about theological ethics in the usual sense, this interpretation may still have Jewish meaning if we situate it in the realm of theodicy.