美德与天意:对近代早期英国古罗马战争的看法

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
N. Popper
{"title":"美德与天意:对近代早期英国古罗马战争的看法","authors":"N. Popper","doi":"10.1353/hlq.2020.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:While historians have investigated how early modern Europeans gleaned instrumental lessons from ancient military sources, Nicholas Popper argues that this form of reading was part of a broad range of interpretative strategies derived from practices of historical analysis that figures like Machiavelli, Justus Lipsius, and Walter Ralegh directed to military texts. Historical modes of reading also underlay the methods of soldiers and scholars who devised alternative and arcane accounts of military success that challenged what they saw as the amorality of the new military science. By placing English military reading and writing in a wider context, the essay suggests that ancient Roman warfare emerged not only as a model for imitation but also as an instrument for assessing the providential significance of the forces threatening and protecting early modern Europe.","PeriodicalId":45445,"journal":{"name":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtue and Providence: Perceptions of Ancient Roman Warfare in Early Modern England\",\"authors\":\"N. Popper\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hlq.2020.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:While historians have investigated how early modern Europeans gleaned instrumental lessons from ancient military sources, Nicholas Popper argues that this form of reading was part of a broad range of interpretative strategies derived from practices of historical analysis that figures like Machiavelli, Justus Lipsius, and Walter Ralegh directed to military texts. Historical modes of reading also underlay the methods of soldiers and scholars who devised alternative and arcane accounts of military success that challenged what they saw as the amorality of the new military science. By placing English military reading and writing in a wider context, the essay suggests that ancient Roman warfare emerged not only as a model for imitation but also as an instrument for assessing the providential significance of the forces threatening and protecting early modern Europe.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2020.0021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2020.0021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然历史学家已经研究了早期现代欧洲人如何从古代军事资料中收集有用的教训,但尼古拉斯·波普尔认为,这种形式的阅读是广泛的解释策略的一部分,这些策略源于马基雅维利、利普修斯和沃尔特·罗利等人对军事文本的历史分析实践。历史阅读模式也为士兵和学者的方法奠定了基础,他们设计了另一种神秘的军事成功描述,挑战了他们所认为的新军事科学的非道德性。通过将英国的军事阅读和写作置于更广阔的背景中,这篇文章表明,古罗马战争的出现不仅是一种模仿的模式,而且是一种评估威胁和保护早期现代欧洲的力量的天意的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtue and Providence: Perceptions of Ancient Roman Warfare in Early Modern England
abstract:While historians have investigated how early modern Europeans gleaned instrumental lessons from ancient military sources, Nicholas Popper argues that this form of reading was part of a broad range of interpretative strategies derived from practices of historical analysis that figures like Machiavelli, Justus Lipsius, and Walter Ralegh directed to military texts. Historical modes of reading also underlay the methods of soldiers and scholars who devised alternative and arcane accounts of military success that challenged what they saw as the amorality of the new military science. By placing English military reading and writing in a wider context, the essay suggests that ancient Roman warfare emerged not only as a model for imitation but also as an instrument for assessing the providential significance of the forces threatening and protecting early modern Europe.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY
HUNTINGTON LIBRARY QUARTERLY HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信