GIS中超高频和超声检测局部放电的灵敏度比较

Bibo Geng, Chengrong Li, B. Qi, Le Yu, Jixin Gao
{"title":"GIS中超高频和超声检测局部放电的灵敏度比较","authors":"Bibo Geng, Chengrong Li, B. Qi, Le Yu, Jixin Gao","doi":"10.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to compare the sensitivity between the UHF and ultrasonic methods for partial discharge detecting in GIS, a 252kV GIS experimental platform was established. Four typical defect models are taken into consideration, including metal particle stuck on the insulator surface; free metal particle on the insulator surface; ground electrode defect and poor contact of high voltage electrode. Through the PD inception voltage and the PRPD (phase resolved partial discharge) spectrogram of UHF and ultrasonic signals, the sensitivity and feature of UHF and ultrasonic methods could be compared. The results indicate that: 1) Compared to the ultrasonic method, the UHF method could detect all four defects mentioned above with high sensitivity. 2) The ultrasonic method could only detect some models with high sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":6317,"journal":{"name":"2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena","volume":"10 1","pages":"468-471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison of sensitivity between the UHF and ultrasonic methods for partial discharge detecting in GIS\",\"authors\":\"Bibo Geng, Chengrong Li, B. Qi, Le Yu, Jixin Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to compare the sensitivity between the UHF and ultrasonic methods for partial discharge detecting in GIS, a 252kV GIS experimental platform was established. Four typical defect models are taken into consideration, including metal particle stuck on the insulator surface; free metal particle on the insulator surface; ground electrode defect and poor contact of high voltage electrode. Through the PD inception voltage and the PRPD (phase resolved partial discharge) spectrogram of UHF and ultrasonic signals, the sensitivity and feature of UHF and ultrasonic methods could be compared. The results indicate that: 1) Compared to the ultrasonic method, the UHF method could detect all four defects mentioned above with high sensitivity. 2) The ultrasonic method could only detect some models with high sensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"468-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEIDP.2011.6232696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

为了比较超高频和超声波两种方法在GIS局部放电检测中的灵敏度,建立了252kV GIS实验平台。考虑了四种典型的缺陷模型:金属颗粒粘滞在绝缘子表面;绝缘子表面有游离金属颗粒;接地电极缺陷,高压电极接触不良。通过超高频和超声信号的PD起始电压和PRPD(相分辨局部放电)谱图,比较超高频和超声两种方法的灵敏度和特性。结果表明:1)与超声检测方法相比,超高频检测方法能够检测出上述四种缺陷,且灵敏度较高。2)超声法只能检测到部分灵敏度较高的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The comparison of sensitivity between the UHF and ultrasonic methods for partial discharge detecting in GIS
In order to compare the sensitivity between the UHF and ultrasonic methods for partial discharge detecting in GIS, a 252kV GIS experimental platform was established. Four typical defect models are taken into consideration, including metal particle stuck on the insulator surface; free metal particle on the insulator surface; ground electrode defect and poor contact of high voltage electrode. Through the PD inception voltage and the PRPD (phase resolved partial discharge) spectrogram of UHF and ultrasonic signals, the sensitivity and feature of UHF and ultrasonic methods could be compared. The results indicate that: 1) Compared to the ultrasonic method, the UHF method could detect all four defects mentioned above with high sensitivity. 2) The ultrasonic method could only detect some models with high sensitivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信