推进专家患者?

A. Rogers
{"title":"推进专家患者?","authors":"A. Rogers","doi":"10.1017/S1463423609001194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The self-management of long-term conditions undertaken by people in their own homes has been attributed with increasing importance in health care policy. Interventions based on self-skills training have been introduced as a means of promoting and increasing levels of self-care practises in the population which have been informed by psychological models and concepts of change such as in the case of the national policy of the Expert Patients Programme (EPP) self-efficacy. Evidence to date suggests modest or equivocal effectiveness and there may be a number of reasons for this. One of the reasons is a failure to give due attention to the perspectives and work that patients themselves undertake in self-management interventions. Whilst the notion of an Expert Patient conveys a sense of what a new health policy centred on long-term condition management hopes to achieve, an important corollary is understanding the conditions necessary to accommodate and embed new techniques in the routine elements of illness ‘work’ undertaken by patients living with a long-term condition. This paper explores the health policy context of self-management, including the evidence and adequacy of the organizing concepts and outcomes associated with the EPP, and suggests that a greater focus on illness work and the social and domestic contexts is required in future innovation and research in the area of long-term condition management.","PeriodicalId":20471,"journal":{"name":"Primary Health Care Research & Development","volume":"468 1","pages":"167 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing the Expert Patient?\",\"authors\":\"A. Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1463423609001194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The self-management of long-term conditions undertaken by people in their own homes has been attributed with increasing importance in health care policy. Interventions based on self-skills training have been introduced as a means of promoting and increasing levels of self-care practises in the population which have been informed by psychological models and concepts of change such as in the case of the national policy of the Expert Patients Programme (EPP) self-efficacy. Evidence to date suggests modest or equivocal effectiveness and there may be a number of reasons for this. One of the reasons is a failure to give due attention to the perspectives and work that patients themselves undertake in self-management interventions. Whilst the notion of an Expert Patient conveys a sense of what a new health policy centred on long-term condition management hopes to achieve, an important corollary is understanding the conditions necessary to accommodate and embed new techniques in the routine elements of illness ‘work’ undertaken by patients living with a long-term condition. This paper explores the health policy context of self-management, including the evidence and adequacy of the organizing concepts and outcomes associated with the EPP, and suggests that a greater focus on illness work and the social and domestic contexts is required in future innovation and research in the area of long-term condition management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Health Care Research & Development\",\"volume\":\"468 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Health Care Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423609001194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Health Care Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423609001194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

在保健政策中,人们对自己家中长期状况的自我管理日益受到重视。以自我技能培训为基础的干预措施已被采用,作为促进和提高人口自我保健实践水平的一种手段,这些做法已被心理模型和变化概念所告知,例如专家病人方案自我效能的国家政策。迄今为止的证据表明,效果一般或模棱两可,这可能有许多原因。其中一个原因是未能对患者自己在自我管理干预中所承担的观点和工作给予应有的重视。虽然专家病人的概念传达了一种以长期病情管理为中心的新卫生政策希望实现的意义,但一个重要的推论是理解必要的条件,以适应并将新技术嵌入长期病情患者承担的疾病“工作”的常规要素中。本文探讨了自我管理的卫生政策背景,包括与EPP相关的组织概念和结果的证据和充分性,并建议在未来的长期疾病管理领域的创新和研究中,需要更多地关注疾病工作以及社会和家庭背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing the Expert Patient?
The self-management of long-term conditions undertaken by people in their own homes has been attributed with increasing importance in health care policy. Interventions based on self-skills training have been introduced as a means of promoting and increasing levels of self-care practises in the population which have been informed by psychological models and concepts of change such as in the case of the national policy of the Expert Patients Programme (EPP) self-efficacy. Evidence to date suggests modest or equivocal effectiveness and there may be a number of reasons for this. One of the reasons is a failure to give due attention to the perspectives and work that patients themselves undertake in self-management interventions. Whilst the notion of an Expert Patient conveys a sense of what a new health policy centred on long-term condition management hopes to achieve, an important corollary is understanding the conditions necessary to accommodate and embed new techniques in the routine elements of illness ‘work’ undertaken by patients living with a long-term condition. This paper explores the health policy context of self-management, including the evidence and adequacy of the organizing concepts and outcomes associated with the EPP, and suggests that a greater focus on illness work and the social and domestic contexts is required in future innovation and research in the area of long-term condition management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信