{"title":"评论:立法要求制造商保持对其产品的支持，并使其更容易维修，这将减少其对环境的影响，但还远远不够","authors":"Antony Bourne","doi":"10.1049/et.2021.1001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE UK GOVERNMENT'S recent 'right to repair' law may be a step in the right direction for consumers and for the environment, but should the legislation have been wider reaching in order to further incentivise the transition to circularity and servitisation? To require manufacturers to become providers not only of products, but of outcomes, experiences and ongoing services too?","PeriodicalId":11578,"journal":{"name":"Engineering & Technology","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment: Legislation requiring manufacturers to maintain support for their products and make it easier to repair them will reduce their environmental impact, but doesn't go far enough\",\"authors\":\"Antony Bourne\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/et.2021.1001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE UK GOVERNMENT'S recent 'right to repair' law may be a step in the right direction for consumers and for the environment, but should the legislation have been wider reaching in order to further incentivise the transition to circularity and servitisation? To require manufacturers to become providers not only of products, but of outcomes, experiences and ongoing services too?\",\"PeriodicalId\":11578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering & Technology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1-1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/et.2021.1001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/et.2021.1001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comment: Legislation requiring manufacturers to maintain support for their products and make it easier to repair them will reduce their environmental impact, but doesn't go far enough
THE UK GOVERNMENT'S recent 'right to repair' law may be a step in the right direction for consumers and for the environment, but should the legislation have been wider reaching in order to further incentivise the transition to circularity and servitisation? To require manufacturers to become providers not only of products, but of outcomes, experiences and ongoing services too?
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
