校园非正式阅读活动学习空间及其与大学生反应的关系

A. Tampubolon, H. E. Kusuma
{"title":"校园非正式阅读活动学习空间及其与大学生反应的关系","authors":"A. Tampubolon, H. E. Kusuma","doi":"10.9744/dimensi.46.2.117-128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Potential of informal learning spaces (ILS) in promoting reading activities are one of a theme of space that can be explored in higher education. This explanatory study was aimed at identifying ILS at selected university which preferred by students as reading space and their relation to students’ responses. Students tend to choose library ILS but non-library ILS also have potential in supporting the responses to be achieved. Students were found to have better comprehension, a good mood, and to read longer in library ILS. Meanwhile, students found it easier to pay attention and felt an increased desire to engage in discussions in non-library ILS, and tended to visit these more often. At this case study, library ILS tends to be used for individual activities, while non-library ILS are used for collaborative or group activities. Adapting function and type of space between ILS categories can be part of efforts to create learning engagement and to support both individual and collaborative work.","PeriodicalId":30518,"journal":{"name":"Dimensi Journal of Architecture and Built Environment","volume":"5 1","pages":"117-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Campus’ Informal Learning Spaces for Reading Activities and Their Relation to Undergraduates’ Responses\",\"authors\":\"A. Tampubolon, H. E. Kusuma\",\"doi\":\"10.9744/dimensi.46.2.117-128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Potential of informal learning spaces (ILS) in promoting reading activities are one of a theme of space that can be explored in higher education. This explanatory study was aimed at identifying ILS at selected university which preferred by students as reading space and their relation to students’ responses. Students tend to choose library ILS but non-library ILS also have potential in supporting the responses to be achieved. Students were found to have better comprehension, a good mood, and to read longer in library ILS. Meanwhile, students found it easier to pay attention and felt an increased desire to engage in discussions in non-library ILS, and tended to visit these more often. At this case study, library ILS tends to be used for individual activities, while non-library ILS are used for collaborative or group activities. Adapting function and type of space between ILS categories can be part of efforts to create learning engagement and to support both individual and collaborative work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dimensi Journal of Architecture and Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"117-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dimensi Journal of Architecture and Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.46.2.117-128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensi Journal of Architecture and Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.46.2.117-128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非正式学习空间在促进阅读活动方面的潜力是高等教育中可以探索的空间主题之一。本解释性研究的目的是确定在选定的大学中,学生首选的阅读空间及其与学生反应的关系。学生倾向于选择图书馆的ILS,但非图书馆的ILS也有可能支持响应的实现。结果发现,在图书馆阅读时,学生的理解力更好,心情也更好,阅读时间也更长。与此同时,学生们发现在非图书馆的ILS中更容易集中注意力,更愿意参与讨论,并倾向于更频繁地访问这些场所。在本案例研究中,图书馆的ILS往往用于个人活动,而非图书馆的ILS用于协作或小组活动。调整ILS类别之间的功能和空间类型可以作为创造学习参与和支持个人和协作工作的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Campus’ Informal Learning Spaces for Reading Activities and Their Relation to Undergraduates’ Responses
Potential of informal learning spaces (ILS) in promoting reading activities are one of a theme of space that can be explored in higher education. This explanatory study was aimed at identifying ILS at selected university which preferred by students as reading space and their relation to students’ responses. Students tend to choose library ILS but non-library ILS also have potential in supporting the responses to be achieved. Students were found to have better comprehension, a good mood, and to read longer in library ILS. Meanwhile, students found it easier to pay attention and felt an increased desire to engage in discussions in non-library ILS, and tended to visit these more often. At this case study, library ILS tends to be used for individual activities, while non-library ILS are used for collaborative or group activities. Adapting function and type of space between ILS categories can be part of efforts to create learning engagement and to support both individual and collaborative work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信