相互依赖的极限:中日关系中的合作与冲突

Adam Eldridge
{"title":"相互依赖的极限:中日关系中的合作与冲突","authors":"Adam Eldridge","doi":"10.21159/NV.06.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the introduction of Deng Xiaoping’s Open Door policy in 1979, the value and complexity of Sino-Japanese economic ties have grown exponentially. However, even as economic ties have developed, security relations have deteriorated as perceptions of a ‘China threat’ and a ‘re-militarised Japan’ have emerged in Tokyo and Beijing. !e simultaneous existence of these trends challenges international relations theory. Economic interdependence theories expect that the development of economic relations reduces the role of security in bilateral relations. Conversely, neorealist theories posit that, given the preeminence of national security, a perception of threat will cool economic relations. Sino-Japanese economic relations have demonstrable bilateral bene\"ts. Additionally, economic relations have created interest groups invested in maintaining good relations. !ese groups have successfully managed economic friction points and integrated bilateral trade. However, economic interdependence seems not to translate to the security calculus con\"rming neorealism’s contention that national security is preeminent. In particular, Japan’s development of Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) illustrates the insigni\"cance of economic ties in security planning. !at said, it is equally true that perceptions of threat appear to have little in#uence on bilateral economic interdependence. !erefore, Sino-Japanese relations are best described by applying interdependence and neorealist theories in a complementary approach.","PeriodicalId":92427,"journal":{"name":"New voices in psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"51-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Limits of Interdependence: Cooperation and Conflict in Sino-Japanese Relations\",\"authors\":\"Adam Eldridge\",\"doi\":\"10.21159/NV.06.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the introduction of Deng Xiaoping’s Open Door policy in 1979, the value and complexity of Sino-Japanese economic ties have grown exponentially. However, even as economic ties have developed, security relations have deteriorated as perceptions of a ‘China threat’ and a ‘re-militarised Japan’ have emerged in Tokyo and Beijing. !e simultaneous existence of these trends challenges international relations theory. Economic interdependence theories expect that the development of economic relations reduces the role of security in bilateral relations. Conversely, neorealist theories posit that, given the preeminence of national security, a perception of threat will cool economic relations. Sino-Japanese economic relations have demonstrable bilateral bene\\\"ts. Additionally, economic relations have created interest groups invested in maintaining good relations. !ese groups have successfully managed economic friction points and integrated bilateral trade. However, economic interdependence seems not to translate to the security calculus con\\\"rming neorealism’s contention that national security is preeminent. In particular, Japan’s development of Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) illustrates the insigni\\\"cance of economic ties in security planning. !at said, it is equally true that perceptions of threat appear to have little in#uence on bilateral economic interdependence. !erefore, Sino-Japanese relations are best described by applying interdependence and neorealist theories in a complementary approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New voices in psychology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"51-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New voices in psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21159/NV.06.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New voices in psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21159/NV.06.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

然而,尽管经济关系得到了发展,但安全关系却恶化了,因为东京和北京都出现了“中国威胁”和“重新军事化的日本”的看法。这些趋势的同时存在对国际关系理论提出了挑战。经济相互依存理论认为,经济关系的发展降低了安全在双边关系中的作用。相反,新现实主义理论认为,鉴于国家安全的重要性,对威胁的感知将使经济关系降温。中日经济关系具有明显的双边利益。此外,经济关系创造了投资于维持良好关系的利益集团。这些集团成功地管控了经济摩擦点,整合了双边贸易。然而,经济上的相互依赖似乎并没有转化为安全考量,从而推翻了新现实主义关于国家安全至上的论点。特别是,日本发展弹道导弹防御系统(BMD)说明了经济关系在安全规划中的重要性。尽管如此,同样真实的是,对威胁的感知似乎对双边经济的相互依存关系几乎没有影响。因此,中日关系最好是用相互依存和新现实主义理论相辅相成的方式来描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Limits of Interdependence: Cooperation and Conflict in Sino-Japanese Relations
Since the introduction of Deng Xiaoping’s Open Door policy in 1979, the value and complexity of Sino-Japanese economic ties have grown exponentially. However, even as economic ties have developed, security relations have deteriorated as perceptions of a ‘China threat’ and a ‘re-militarised Japan’ have emerged in Tokyo and Beijing. !e simultaneous existence of these trends challenges international relations theory. Economic interdependence theories expect that the development of economic relations reduces the role of security in bilateral relations. Conversely, neorealist theories posit that, given the preeminence of national security, a perception of threat will cool economic relations. Sino-Japanese economic relations have demonstrable bilateral bene"ts. Additionally, economic relations have created interest groups invested in maintaining good relations. !ese groups have successfully managed economic friction points and integrated bilateral trade. However, economic interdependence seems not to translate to the security calculus con"rming neorealism’s contention that national security is preeminent. In particular, Japan’s development of Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) illustrates the insigni"cance of economic ties in security planning. !at said, it is equally true that perceptions of threat appear to have little in#uence on bilateral economic interdependence. !erefore, Sino-Japanese relations are best described by applying interdependence and neorealist theories in a complementary approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信