Muhamad Arif Rohman, M. Wibowo, Nuroji Nuroji
{"title":"KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN DINDING PRECAST DENGAN DINDING KONVENSIONAL PADA PROYEK CORDOVA SEMARANG","authors":"Muhamad Arif Rohman, M. Wibowo, Nuroji Nuroji","doi":"10.32497/WAHANATS.V26I1.2643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation in the world of construction is something that is indispensable, one of theinnovations in the construction sector is precast. The use of precast is expected to beable to reduce project costs to accelerate the duration of work. But in fact, theproducts of innovation in the world of construction have not been fully able to havea positive impact, both in terms of cost, quality, time, waste, on project development.Products of innovation are usually not necessarily in accordance with the wishesand needs of the customer. The purpose of this research is to analyze thecomparison of products in terms of time, cost, quality, waste, and in terms of K3Lbetween projects using precast walls and projects using the lightweight brick wallmethod. This research was conducted by (1) conducting a project simulation if theproject did not use precast, (2) comparing a real project with a simulation project interms of cost, quality, time, waste, and K3L. The use of precast in the Cordovaproject when compared to a simulation project that uses lightweight bricks results in(1) in terms of time saving 36,84 % on the simulation results project (2) in terms ofcosts can be reduced by Rp. 101.488.543,99 (3) in terms of quality precast materialhas The quality is better than the lightweight bricks (4) in terms of waste, in thesimulation result project it creates more waste (5) in terms of K3L, the use ofprecast is more environmentally friendly than the simulation results project.","PeriodicalId":34836,"journal":{"name":"Prokons","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prokons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32497/WAHANATS.V26I1.2643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑领域的创新是不可缺少的,预制是建筑领域的创新之一。使用预制件有望降低工程成本,加快工期。但事实上,建筑领域的创新产品并没有完全能够对项目开发产生积极的影响,无论是在成本,质量,时间,浪费方面。创新的产品通常并不一定符合顾客的愿望和需求。本研究的目的是分析使用预制墙的项目和使用轻质砖墙方法的项目在时间、成本、质量、浪费和k3l方面的产品比较。本研究通过(1)在项目不使用预制件的情况下进行项目模拟,(2)在成本、质量、时间、浪费和K3L方面将真实项目与模拟项目进行比较。与使用轻质砖的模拟项目相比,在cordova项目中使用预制件的结果是(1)在模拟结果项目中节省时间36.84%(2)在成本方面可以减少Rp. 101.488.543,99(3)在预制材料质量方面优于轻质砖(4)在浪费方面,在模拟结果项目中它产生更多的浪费(5)在K3L方面,采用预制构件比模拟结果工程更环保。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KAJIAN PERBANDINGAN PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN DINDING PRECAST DENGAN DINDING KONVENSIONAL PADA PROYEK CORDOVA SEMARANG
Innovation in the world of construction is something that is indispensable, one of theinnovations in the construction sector is precast. The use of precast is expected to beable to reduce project costs to accelerate the duration of work. But in fact, theproducts of innovation in the world of construction have not been fully able to havea positive impact, both in terms of cost, quality, time, waste, on project development.Products of innovation are usually not necessarily in accordance with the wishesand needs of the customer. The purpose of this research is to analyze thecomparison of products in terms of time, cost, quality, waste, and in terms of K3Lbetween projects using precast walls and projects using the lightweight brick wallmethod. This research was conducted by (1) conducting a project simulation if theproject did not use precast, (2) comparing a real project with a simulation project interms of cost, quality, time, waste, and K3L. The use of precast in the Cordovaproject when compared to a simulation project that uses lightweight bricks results in(1) in terms of time saving 36,84 % on the simulation results project (2) in terms ofcosts can be reduced by Rp. 101.488.543,99 (3) in terms of quality precast materialhas The quality is better than the lightweight bricks (4) in terms of waste, in thesimulation result project it creates more waste (5) in terms of K3L, the use ofprecast is more environmentally friendly than the simulation results project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信