{"title":"比较12周三种类型的阻力训练(传统、循环和间歇)对非运动肥胖男性神经调节蛋白4、脂联素和瘦素水平的影响。","authors":"Mona Alizadeh, Shahnaz Shahrbanian, A. Hackney","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nThe purpose of this study was to compare three types of resistance training including traditional, circular and interval in non-athletic men with obesity in comparison to a control group for neuregulin 4, adiponectin and leptin responses.\n\n\nMaterial and method\nThe sample of the study included 44 non-athletic men with obesity, who were randomly divided into the 4 equal groups (10 per each group): traditional, circular, and interval resistance training as well as a control group. Neuregulin 4, leptin and adiponectin were analyzed using ELISA commercial kits.\n\n\nResults\nThe results of mixed-design ANOVA with repeated measures showed that there was a significant interaction between the type of resistance training used and time on neuregulin 4 (F (3, 40) = 80.22, P= 0.005, ES = 0.85), leptin (F (3, 40) = 27.53, P= 0.005, ES = 0.67) and adiponectin (F (3, 40) = 12.44, P= 0.005, ES = 0.48). Considering the main effect of groups, results indicated that there was a significant difference between types of resistance training and control group in neuregulin 4 (F (1, 40) =41.31, P=0.005, ES = 0.75), adiponectin (F (1, 40) =15.08, P=0.005, ES = 0.53) and leptin (F (1, 40) =32.05, P = 0.005, ES = 0.70).\n\n\nConclusion\nFindings suggest that resistance training, especially interval resistance training can lead to increase the plasma level of neuregulin 4, adiponectin and decrease leptin in non-athletic men with obesity. Interval training showed superior effects on all study outcomes followed by circular and traditional training, respectively.","PeriodicalId":92987,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de medicina del deporte : publicacion de la Federacion Espanola de Medicina del Deporte","volume":"5 1","pages":"389-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effects of 12 weeks of three types of resistance training (traditional, circular and interval) on the levels of neuregulin 4, adiponectin and leptin in non-athletic men with obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Mona Alizadeh, Shahnaz Shahrbanian, A. Hackney\",\"doi\":\"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives\\nThe purpose of this study was to compare three types of resistance training including traditional, circular and interval in non-athletic men with obesity in comparison to a control group for neuregulin 4, adiponectin and leptin responses.\\n\\n\\nMaterial and method\\nThe sample of the study included 44 non-athletic men with obesity, who were randomly divided into the 4 equal groups (10 per each group): traditional, circular, and interval resistance training as well as a control group. Neuregulin 4, leptin and adiponectin were analyzed using ELISA commercial kits.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nThe results of mixed-design ANOVA with repeated measures showed that there was a significant interaction between the type of resistance training used and time on neuregulin 4 (F (3, 40) = 80.22, P= 0.005, ES = 0.85), leptin (F (3, 40) = 27.53, P= 0.005, ES = 0.67) and adiponectin (F (3, 40) = 12.44, P= 0.005, ES = 0.48). Considering the main effect of groups, results indicated that there was a significant difference between types of resistance training and control group in neuregulin 4 (F (1, 40) =41.31, P=0.005, ES = 0.75), adiponectin (F (1, 40) =15.08, P=0.005, ES = 0.53) and leptin (F (1, 40) =32.05, P = 0.005, ES = 0.70).\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nFindings suggest that resistance training, especially interval resistance training can lead to increase the plasma level of neuregulin 4, adiponectin and decrease leptin in non-athletic men with obesity. Interval training showed superior effects on all study outcomes followed by circular and traditional training, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de medicina del deporte : publicacion de la Federacion Espanola de Medicina del Deporte\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"389-396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de medicina del deporte : publicacion de la Federacion Espanola de Medicina del Deporte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de medicina del deporte : publicacion de la Federacion Espanola de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的本研究的目的是比较三种类型的阻力训练,包括传统,循环和间歇训练的非运动肥胖男性与对照组相比,神经调节蛋白4,脂联素和瘦素的反应。材料和方法研究样本包括44名非运动肥胖男性,他们被随机分为4组(每组10人):传统、循环、间歇阻力训练和对照组。采用ELISA试剂盒分析神经调节蛋白4、瘦素和脂联素。结果重复测量的混合设计方差分析结果显示,抗阻训练类型与时间对神经调节蛋白4 (F (3,40) = 80.22, P= 0.005, ES = 0.85)、瘦素(F (3,40) = 27.53, P= 0.005, ES = 0.67)和脂联素(F (3,40) = 12.44, P= 0.005, ES = 0.48)的影响显著。考虑各组主效应,结果显示,不同类型抗阻训练组与对照组在神经调节蛋白4 (F (1,40) =41.31, P=0.005, ES = 0.75)、脂联素(F (1,40) =15.08, P=0.005, ES = 0.53)和瘦素(F (1,40) =32.05, P=0.005, ES = 0.70)方面存在显著差异。结论抗阻训练,特别是间歇抗阻训练可导致非运动男性肥胖患者血浆神经调节蛋白4、脂联素水平升高,瘦素水平降低。间歇训练对所有研究结果的影响均优于循环训练和传统训练。
Comparison of the effects of 12 weeks of three types of resistance training (traditional, circular and interval) on the levels of neuregulin 4, adiponectin and leptin in non-athletic men with obesity.
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to compare three types of resistance training including traditional, circular and interval in non-athletic men with obesity in comparison to a control group for neuregulin 4, adiponectin and leptin responses.
Material and method
The sample of the study included 44 non-athletic men with obesity, who were randomly divided into the 4 equal groups (10 per each group): traditional, circular, and interval resistance training as well as a control group. Neuregulin 4, leptin and adiponectin were analyzed using ELISA commercial kits.
Results
The results of mixed-design ANOVA with repeated measures showed that there was a significant interaction between the type of resistance training used and time on neuregulin 4 (F (3, 40) = 80.22, P= 0.005, ES = 0.85), leptin (F (3, 40) = 27.53, P= 0.005, ES = 0.67) and adiponectin (F (3, 40) = 12.44, P= 0.005, ES = 0.48). Considering the main effect of groups, results indicated that there was a significant difference between types of resistance training and control group in neuregulin 4 (F (1, 40) =41.31, P=0.005, ES = 0.75), adiponectin (F (1, 40) =15.08, P=0.005, ES = 0.53) and leptin (F (1, 40) =32.05, P = 0.005, ES = 0.70).
Conclusion
Findings suggest that resistance training, especially interval resistance training can lead to increase the plasma level of neuregulin 4, adiponectin and decrease leptin in non-athletic men with obesity. Interval training showed superior effects on all study outcomes followed by circular and traditional training, respectively.