从汉明oracle中高效地提取每个查询信息

W. Ewert, George D. Montañez, W. Dembski, R. Marks
{"title":"从汉明oracle中高效地提取每个查询信息","authors":"W. Ewert, George D. Montañez, W. Dembski, R. Marks","doi":"10.1109/SSST.2010.5442816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computer search often uses an oracle to determine the value of a proposed problem solution. Information is extracted from the oracle using repeated queries. Crafting a search algorithm to most efficiently extract this information is the job of the programmer. In many instances this is done using the programmer's experience and knowledge of the problem being solved. For the Hamming oracle, we have the ability to assess the performance of various search algorithms using the currency of query count. Of the search procedures considered, blind search performs the worst. We show that evolutionary algorithms, although better than blind search, are a relatively inefficient method of information extraction. An algorithm methodically establishing and tracking the frequency of occurrence of alphabet characters performs even better. We also show that a search for the search for an optimal tree search, as suggested by our previous work, becomes computationally intensive.","PeriodicalId":6463,"journal":{"name":"2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient per query information extraction from a Hamming oracle\",\"authors\":\"W. Ewert, George D. Montañez, W. Dembski, R. Marks\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SSST.2010.5442816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computer search often uses an oracle to determine the value of a proposed problem solution. Information is extracted from the oracle using repeated queries. Crafting a search algorithm to most efficiently extract this information is the job of the programmer. In many instances this is done using the programmer's experience and knowledge of the problem being solved. For the Hamming oracle, we have the ability to assess the performance of various search algorithms using the currency of query count. Of the search procedures considered, blind search performs the worst. We show that evolutionary algorithms, although better than blind search, are a relatively inefficient method of information extraction. An algorithm methodically establishing and tracking the frequency of occurrence of alphabet characters performs even better. We also show that a search for the search for an optimal tree search, as suggested by our previous work, becomes computationally intensive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSST.2010.5442816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 42nd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSST.2010.5442816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

计算机搜索通常使用oracle来确定所提出的问题解决方案的价值。通过重复查询从oracle中提取信息。编写搜索算法以最有效地提取这些信息是程序员的工作。在许多情况下,这是利用程序员的经验和正在解决的问题的知识来完成的。对于Hamming oracle,我们可以使用查询计数来评估各种搜索算法的性能。在考虑的搜索过程中,盲搜索的性能最差。我们表明,进化算法虽然优于盲目搜索,但却是一种相对低效的信息提取方法。一种系统地建立和跟踪字母字符出现频率的算法表现得更好。我们还表明,搜索最优树搜索的搜索,正如我们之前的工作所建议的那样,变得计算密集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficient per query information extraction from a Hamming oracle
Computer search often uses an oracle to determine the value of a proposed problem solution. Information is extracted from the oracle using repeated queries. Crafting a search algorithm to most efficiently extract this information is the job of the programmer. In many instances this is done using the programmer's experience and knowledge of the problem being solved. For the Hamming oracle, we have the ability to assess the performance of various search algorithms using the currency of query count. Of the search procedures considered, blind search performs the worst. We show that evolutionary algorithms, although better than blind search, are a relatively inefficient method of information extraction. An algorithm methodically establishing and tracking the frequency of occurrence of alphabet characters performs even better. We also show that a search for the search for an optimal tree search, as suggested by our previous work, becomes computationally intensive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信