癌症疼痛管理:第二部分:介入技术

J. Scott-Warren, A. Bhaskar
{"title":"癌症疼痛管理:第二部分:介入技术","authors":"J. Scott-Warren, A. Bhaskar","doi":"10.1093/BJACEACCP/MKU012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The WHO analgesic ladder, with its emphasis on ‘by the clock’ oral analgesia, forms a useful framework for the initial pharmacological management of patients with cancer pain. It is reported to be successful in 80–90% of patients. However, of the 10–20% of patients with pain that is poorly responsive to opioids, or where side-effects are particularly problematic, some may greatly benefit from invasive procedures designed to interrupt pain signals along neural pathways from periphery to the brain. It should be emphasized that such procedures should not be seen as the ‘4th step’ of the WHO analgesic ladder, but can and should be considered at each step depending on patient preference and need. There is opportunity to interrupt nocioceptive traffic at peripheral and central levels via destructive neuroablatory or non-destructive techniques. All interventions designed to relieve cancer pain carry attendant risk, and these must be weighed against potential benefits on a case-by-case basis. Overall, 8% of patients with cancer pain may require nerve blocks, 3% neurolytic blocks, and 3% neuraxial techniques.","PeriodicalId":100332,"journal":{"name":"Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer pain management: Part II: Interventional techniques\",\"authors\":\"J. Scott-Warren, A. Bhaskar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/BJACEACCP/MKU012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The WHO analgesic ladder, with its emphasis on ‘by the clock’ oral analgesia, forms a useful framework for the initial pharmacological management of patients with cancer pain. It is reported to be successful in 80–90% of patients. However, of the 10–20% of patients with pain that is poorly responsive to opioids, or where side-effects are particularly problematic, some may greatly benefit from invasive procedures designed to interrupt pain signals along neural pathways from periphery to the brain. It should be emphasized that such procedures should not be seen as the ‘4th step’ of the WHO analgesic ladder, but can and should be considered at each step depending on patient preference and need. There is opportunity to interrupt nocioceptive traffic at peripheral and central levels via destructive neuroablatory or non-destructive techniques. All interventions designed to relieve cancer pain carry attendant risk, and these must be weighed against potential benefits on a case-by-case basis. Overall, 8% of patients with cancer pain may require nerve blocks, 3% neurolytic blocks, and 3% neuraxial techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/BJACEACCP/MKU012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/BJACEACCP/MKU012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

世卫组织镇痛阶梯强调“按时钟”口服镇痛,为癌症疼痛患者的初步药理管理形成了一个有用的框架。据报道,80-90%的患者都能成功。然而,在10-20%对阿片类药物反应不良或副作用特别严重的疼痛患者中,一些患者可能会从旨在中断从外周到大脑的神经通路的疼痛信号的侵入性手术中受益匪浅。应该强调的是,这些程序不应被视为世卫组织镇痛阶梯的“第四步”,而可以而且应该根据患者的偏好和需要在每一步进行考虑。有机会通过破坏性的神经消融或非破坏性技术中断外周和中枢水平的伤害性交通。所有旨在缓解癌症疼痛的干预措施都伴随着风险,这些风险必须在个案基础上与潜在的益处进行权衡。总体而言,8%的癌性疼痛患者可能需要神经阻滞,3%的神经溶解阻滞和3%的轴突技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cancer pain management: Part II: Interventional techniques
The WHO analgesic ladder, with its emphasis on ‘by the clock’ oral analgesia, forms a useful framework for the initial pharmacological management of patients with cancer pain. It is reported to be successful in 80–90% of patients. However, of the 10–20% of patients with pain that is poorly responsive to opioids, or where side-effects are particularly problematic, some may greatly benefit from invasive procedures designed to interrupt pain signals along neural pathways from periphery to the brain. It should be emphasized that such procedures should not be seen as the ‘4th step’ of the WHO analgesic ladder, but can and should be considered at each step depending on patient preference and need. There is opportunity to interrupt nocioceptive traffic at peripheral and central levels via destructive neuroablatory or non-destructive techniques. All interventions designed to relieve cancer pain carry attendant risk, and these must be weighed against potential benefits on a case-by-case basis. Overall, 8% of patients with cancer pain may require nerve blocks, 3% neurolytic blocks, and 3% neuraxial techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信