田园生活的权力

R. Evans
{"title":"田园生活的权力","authors":"R. Evans","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190058777.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From 1977 to 1978, the Philadelphia Police Department established a blockade around the MOVE house. Eventually, this blockade became a starvation blockade, when the mayor, Frank Rizzo, determined that the best way to end the standoff was to starve MOVE people into surrendering. During this standoff, respected religious leaders representing various faith traditions negotiated between MOVE and the city. These religious leaders initially came to MOVE’s defense. Some of them believed that MOVE was a religion, and that the city’s actions threatened religious freedom in the city. As the negotiations wore on, however, MOVE lost their initial support. The religious leaders who previously defended MOVE decided that MOVE was not, in fact, a religion and sided with the city. In so doing, these religious leaders articulated a series of claims about the nature of “true religion” to explain why MOVE was not, in their view, a religion.","PeriodicalId":91936,"journal":{"name":"On the move to meaningful Internet systems ... : CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE : Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE ... proceedings. OTM Confederated International Conferences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pastoral Power\",\"authors\":\"R. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190058777.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From 1977 to 1978, the Philadelphia Police Department established a blockade around the MOVE house. Eventually, this blockade became a starvation blockade, when the mayor, Frank Rizzo, determined that the best way to end the standoff was to starve MOVE people into surrendering. During this standoff, respected religious leaders representing various faith traditions negotiated between MOVE and the city. These religious leaders initially came to MOVE’s defense. Some of them believed that MOVE was a religion, and that the city’s actions threatened religious freedom in the city. As the negotiations wore on, however, MOVE lost their initial support. The religious leaders who previously defended MOVE decided that MOVE was not, in fact, a religion and sided with the city. In so doing, these religious leaders articulated a series of claims about the nature of “true religion” to explain why MOVE was not, in their view, a religion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"On the move to meaningful Internet systems ... : CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE : Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE ... proceedings. OTM Confederated International Conferences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"On the move to meaningful Internet systems ... : CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE : Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE ... proceedings. OTM Confederated International Conferences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190058777.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On the move to meaningful Internet systems ... : CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE : Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE ... proceedings. OTM Confederated International Conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190058777.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

从1977年到1978年,费城警察局在搬家公司周围设置了封锁。最终,当市长弗兰克·里佐(Frank Rizzo)决定结束僵局的最佳方式是让MOVE的人挨饿投降时,这种封锁变成了饥饿封锁。在这场对峙中,代表不同信仰传统的受人尊敬的宗教领袖在MOVE和城市之间进行了谈判。这些宗教领袖最初为MOVE辩护。他们中的一些人认为MOVE是一种宗教,而该市的行动威胁到了该市的宗教自由。然而,随着谈判的进行,MOVE失去了最初的支持。此前为MOVE辩护的宗教领袖认为,MOVE实际上不是一种宗教,他们站在了这座城市一边。在这样做的过程中,这些宗教领袖清晰地表达了一系列关于“真正宗教”本质的主张,以解释为什么在他们看来,MOVE不是宗教。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pastoral Power
From 1977 to 1978, the Philadelphia Police Department established a blockade around the MOVE house. Eventually, this blockade became a starvation blockade, when the mayor, Frank Rizzo, determined that the best way to end the standoff was to starve MOVE people into surrendering. During this standoff, respected religious leaders representing various faith traditions negotiated between MOVE and the city. These religious leaders initially came to MOVE’s defense. Some of them believed that MOVE was a religion, and that the city’s actions threatened religious freedom in the city. As the negotiations wore on, however, MOVE lost their initial support. The religious leaders who previously defended MOVE decided that MOVE was not, in fact, a religion and sided with the city. In so doing, these religious leaders articulated a series of claims about the nature of “true religion” to explain why MOVE was not, in their view, a religion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信