线性疤痕中患者与观察者疤痕评定量表的Rasch分析:对患者与观察者疤痕评定量表v2.1的建议

F. Franchignoni, A. Giordano, S. Vercelli, Elisabetta Bravini, Valeria Stissi, G. Ferriero
{"title":"线性疤痕中患者与观察者疤痕评定量表的Rasch分析:对患者与观察者疤痕评定量表v2.1的建议","authors":"F. Franchignoni, A. Giordano, S. Vercelli, Elisabetta Bravini, Valeria Stissi, G. Ferriero","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) v2.0 is a widely used instrument to evaluate postsurgical scars. Its two subscales respectively investigate the patient's and clinician's opinion on the scar quality. However, psychometric studies of the POSAS have indicated that its metric performance is suboptimal, and structural adjustments may be appropriate. The authors aimed to verify through Rasch analysis the measurement properties of the POSAS v2.0, and propose eventual structural refinements for an easier and more confident use of the scale in clinical practice and research.\n\n\nMETHODS\nConsecutive patients admitted to two rehabilitation centers for postsurgery rehabilitation over a 2-year period underwent scar assessments with the POSAS v2.0. We performed Rasch analysis to examine the scale's dimensionality, rating categories, item fit, reliability indices, local item independence, and differential item functioning.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe study population consisted of 115 patients. The 10 response options of the POSAS showed malfunctioning, and thus were collapsed, forming a parsimonious five-level rating scale, which helped to improve the measurement accuracy. After that, unidimensionality of both subscales was confirmed. Then, internal construct validity of the POSAS v2.0 was demonstrated (through item fit to the Rasch model). Reliability indices were high (≥0.80). No significant differential item functioning was detected concerning age or sex.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis study demonstrates the good psychometric properties of a simplified Rasch-based version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale with five response options (POSAS v2.1) in patients with postsurgical linear scars, and provides insights for future refinement of the tool.","PeriodicalId":20168,"journal":{"name":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rasch Analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Linear Scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1.\",\"authors\":\"F. Franchignoni, A. Giordano, S. Vercelli, Elisabetta Bravini, Valeria Stissi, G. Ferriero\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThe Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) v2.0 is a widely used instrument to evaluate postsurgical scars. Its two subscales respectively investigate the patient's and clinician's opinion on the scar quality. However, psychometric studies of the POSAS have indicated that its metric performance is suboptimal, and structural adjustments may be appropriate. The authors aimed to verify through Rasch analysis the measurement properties of the POSAS v2.0, and propose eventual structural refinements for an easier and more confident use of the scale in clinical practice and research.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nConsecutive patients admitted to two rehabilitation centers for postsurgery rehabilitation over a 2-year period underwent scar assessments with the POSAS v2.0. We performed Rasch analysis to examine the scale's dimensionality, rating categories, item fit, reliability indices, local item independence, and differential item functioning.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe study population consisted of 115 patients. The 10 response options of the POSAS showed malfunctioning, and thus were collapsed, forming a parsimonious five-level rating scale, which helped to improve the measurement accuracy. After that, unidimensionality of both subscales was confirmed. Then, internal construct validity of the POSAS v2.0 was demonstrated (through item fit to the Rasch model). Reliability indices were high (≥0.80). No significant differential item functioning was detected concerning age or sex.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThis study demonstrates the good psychometric properties of a simplified Rasch-based version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale with five response options (POSAS v2.1) in patients with postsurgical linear scars, and provides insights for future refinement of the tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS) v2.0是一种广泛使用的评估手术后疤痕的工具。它的两个分量表分别考察患者和临床医生对疤痕质量的看法。然而,POSAS的心理测量学研究表明,其度量性能是次优的,结构调整可能是适当的。作者旨在通过Rasch分析验证POSAS v2.0的测量特性,并提出最终的结构改进,以便在临床实践和研究中更容易和更自信地使用该量表。方法连续2年在2家康复中心接受术后康复治疗的患者采用POSAS v2.0进行疤痕评估。我们进行了Rasch分析来检验量表的维度、评级类别、项目契合度、可靠性指标、局部项目独立性和差异项目功能。结果研究人群包括115例患者。POSAS的10个回答选项出现故障,因此被崩溃,形成一个简洁的五级评定量表,有助于提高测量精度。之后,两个分量表的单维性得到了证实。然后,通过项目拟合Rasch模型,验证了POSAS v2.0的内部结构效度。信度指标高(≥0.80)。没有发现与年龄或性别有关的显著差异项目功能。结论:本研究证明了简化的rasch版本的患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS v2.1)在术后线性疤痕患者中具有良好的心理测量特性,并为未来改进该工具提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rasch Analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Linear Scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1.
BACKGROUND The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) v2.0 is a widely used instrument to evaluate postsurgical scars. Its two subscales respectively investigate the patient's and clinician's opinion on the scar quality. However, psychometric studies of the POSAS have indicated that its metric performance is suboptimal, and structural adjustments may be appropriate. The authors aimed to verify through Rasch analysis the measurement properties of the POSAS v2.0, and propose eventual structural refinements for an easier and more confident use of the scale in clinical practice and research. METHODS Consecutive patients admitted to two rehabilitation centers for postsurgery rehabilitation over a 2-year period underwent scar assessments with the POSAS v2.0. We performed Rasch analysis to examine the scale's dimensionality, rating categories, item fit, reliability indices, local item independence, and differential item functioning. RESULTS The study population consisted of 115 patients. The 10 response options of the POSAS showed malfunctioning, and thus were collapsed, forming a parsimonious five-level rating scale, which helped to improve the measurement accuracy. After that, unidimensionality of both subscales was confirmed. Then, internal construct validity of the POSAS v2.0 was demonstrated (through item fit to the Rasch model). Reliability indices were high (≥0.80). No significant differential item functioning was detected concerning age or sex. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the good psychometric properties of a simplified Rasch-based version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale with five response options (POSAS v2.1) in patients with postsurgical linear scars, and provides insights for future refinement of the tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信