蒸汽驱是一种低矿化度水驱吗?

Hasan N. Al-Saedi, W. Al-Bazzaz, R. Flori
{"title":"蒸汽驱是一种低矿化度水驱吗?","authors":"Hasan N. Al-Saedi, W. Al-Bazzaz, R. Flori","doi":"10.2118/194820-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Previously, Al-Saedi and Flori et al. 2018d proposed a novel steam-low salinity EOR technique called low salinity-alternating-steam flooding (LSASF) into a reservoir core with a high reservoir temperature. Naturally, if a reservoir's temperature is very low, then oil is heavy. Using thermal EOR techniques in such a low-temperature reservoir resulted in considerable heat loss. In this study, we investigate the steam lifespan from the injector to the producer in order to check if the injected steam is still active throughout the flooding process or if it will condense because of the heat loss. The Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir, as with other heavy oil reservoirs, is a low temperature (23°C) shallow reservoir containing heavy oil (600 cP). We believe that steam injected into various cores from the Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir will condense due to the low reservoir temperature. The question is whether or not this condensed steam behave similarly to low salinity (LS) waterflooding.\n First, the steam was injected into the oil-free core to determice when the steam condensed and what temperature it condensed at by using a multi-port model to check if the injected steam turned into water.\n Several Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir cores were initially flooded with formation water (FW), and then were flooded with different scenarios of steam and LS water. The temperatures of the inlet, the core, and the outlet were recorded. The effluent was collected from different ports out of the cores and different producer positions in order to follow up the steam position inside the core.\n Core contact angle measurements were conducted throughout the flooded cores to determine the wettability alteration between steam and condensed steam (LS water) with the rock.\n This study shows that when steam turned into LS water, the sandstone core wettability was altered towards being more water-wet. The condensed steam is considered to be hot LS water, which can reduce oil viscosity and alter the wettability at the same time.\n These results were for short length cores. If these results are upscaled up to the oil reservoir scale, then the steam will still be turned into LS cold water (LSCW) as will be illustrated in the analytical model (We are still working on the analytical model). The LSCW will work as a wettability modifier only without reducing the oil viscosity. LSCW is not favorable for use in heavy oil reservoirs because the sweep efficiency is very low due to density differences unless the LS water chemistry is manipulated; however, contact angle measurements showed that the LSCW altered the sandstone wettability towards the neutral wet condition.","PeriodicalId":10908,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Steamflooding a Form of Low Salinity Waterflooding?\",\"authors\":\"Hasan N. Al-Saedi, W. Al-Bazzaz, R. Flori\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/194820-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Previously, Al-Saedi and Flori et al. 2018d proposed a novel steam-low salinity EOR technique called low salinity-alternating-steam flooding (LSASF) into a reservoir core with a high reservoir temperature. Naturally, if a reservoir's temperature is very low, then oil is heavy. Using thermal EOR techniques in such a low-temperature reservoir resulted in considerable heat loss. In this study, we investigate the steam lifespan from the injector to the producer in order to check if the injected steam is still active throughout the flooding process or if it will condense because of the heat loss. The Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir, as with other heavy oil reservoirs, is a low temperature (23°C) shallow reservoir containing heavy oil (600 cP). We believe that steam injected into various cores from the Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir will condense due to the low reservoir temperature. The question is whether or not this condensed steam behave similarly to low salinity (LS) waterflooding.\\n First, the steam was injected into the oil-free core to determice when the steam condensed and what temperature it condensed at by using a multi-port model to check if the injected steam turned into water.\\n Several Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir cores were initially flooded with formation water (FW), and then were flooded with different scenarios of steam and LS water. The temperatures of the inlet, the core, and the outlet were recorded. The effluent was collected from different ports out of the cores and different producer positions in order to follow up the steam position inside the core.\\n Core contact angle measurements were conducted throughout the flooded cores to determine the wettability alteration between steam and condensed steam (LS water) with the rock.\\n This study shows that when steam turned into LS water, the sandstone core wettability was altered towards being more water-wet. The condensed steam is considered to be hot LS water, which can reduce oil viscosity and alter the wettability at the same time.\\n These results were for short length cores. If these results are upscaled up to the oil reservoir scale, then the steam will still be turned into LS cold water (LSCW) as will be illustrated in the analytical model (We are still working on the analytical model). The LSCW will work as a wettability modifier only without reducing the oil viscosity. LSCW is not favorable for use in heavy oil reservoirs because the sweep efficiency is very low due to density differences unless the LS water chemistry is manipulated; however, contact angle measurements showed that the LSCW altered the sandstone wettability towards the neutral wet condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/194820-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194820-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

此前,al - saedi和Flori等人(2018d)提出了一种新型的蒸汽-低矿化度EOR技术,称为低矿化度-蒸汽交替驱(LSASF)到具有高储层温度的储层岩心。自然地,如果储层的温度很低,那么油就很重。在如此低温的储层中使用热驱技术会导致相当大的热损失。在这项研究中,我们研究了从注入器到生产者的蒸汽寿命,以检查注入的蒸汽在整个驱油过程中是否仍然有效,或者是否会因为热损失而凝结。与其他稠油油藏一样,Bartlesville砂岩油藏是一个低温(23°C)浅层油藏,含稠油(600 cP)。我们认为,由于储层温度较低,从Bartlesville砂岩储层注入到各种岩心的蒸汽将会凝结。问题是这种冷凝蒸汽的行为是否与低盐度(LS)水驱相似。首先,将蒸汽注入无油岩心,通过多端口模型检查注入的蒸汽是否变成水,确定蒸汽何时凝结以及凝结温度。几个Bartlesville砂岩油藏岩心最初被地层水(FW)淹没,然后被不同情景的蒸汽和LS水淹没。记录了入口、堆芯和出口的温度。为了跟踪堆芯内的蒸汽位置,从堆芯外的不同端口和不同的生产者位置收集了流出物。在整个淹水岩心中进行岩心接触角测量,以确定蒸汽和冷凝蒸汽(LS水)与岩石之间的润湿性变化。研究表明,当水蒸气转化为LS水时,砂岩岩心润湿性向水润湿性转变。冷凝后的蒸汽被认为是热LS水,它可以降低油的粘度,同时改变润湿性。这些结果适用于短长度岩芯。如果这些结果被放大到油藏规模,那么蒸汽仍然会变成LS冷水(LSCW),这将在分析模型中说明(我们仍在研究分析模型)。LSCW只能作为润湿性改进剂,而不能降低油的粘度。LSCW不适用于稠油油藏,因为由于密度差异,扫描效率非常低,除非对LS水的化学成分进行控制;然而,接触角测量表明,LSCW使砂岩的润湿性向中性湿润状态转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Steamflooding a Form of Low Salinity Waterflooding?
Previously, Al-Saedi and Flori et al. 2018d proposed a novel steam-low salinity EOR technique called low salinity-alternating-steam flooding (LSASF) into a reservoir core with a high reservoir temperature. Naturally, if a reservoir's temperature is very low, then oil is heavy. Using thermal EOR techniques in such a low-temperature reservoir resulted in considerable heat loss. In this study, we investigate the steam lifespan from the injector to the producer in order to check if the injected steam is still active throughout the flooding process or if it will condense because of the heat loss. The Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir, as with other heavy oil reservoirs, is a low temperature (23°C) shallow reservoir containing heavy oil (600 cP). We believe that steam injected into various cores from the Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir will condense due to the low reservoir temperature. The question is whether or not this condensed steam behave similarly to low salinity (LS) waterflooding. First, the steam was injected into the oil-free core to determice when the steam condensed and what temperature it condensed at by using a multi-port model to check if the injected steam turned into water. Several Bartlesville Sandstone Reservoir cores were initially flooded with formation water (FW), and then were flooded with different scenarios of steam and LS water. The temperatures of the inlet, the core, and the outlet were recorded. The effluent was collected from different ports out of the cores and different producer positions in order to follow up the steam position inside the core. Core contact angle measurements were conducted throughout the flooded cores to determine the wettability alteration between steam and condensed steam (LS water) with the rock. This study shows that when steam turned into LS water, the sandstone core wettability was altered towards being more water-wet. The condensed steam is considered to be hot LS water, which can reduce oil viscosity and alter the wettability at the same time. These results were for short length cores. If these results are upscaled up to the oil reservoir scale, then the steam will still be turned into LS cold water (LSCW) as will be illustrated in the analytical model (We are still working on the analytical model). The LSCW will work as a wettability modifier only without reducing the oil viscosity. LSCW is not favorable for use in heavy oil reservoirs because the sweep efficiency is very low due to density differences unless the LS water chemistry is manipulated; however, contact angle measurements showed that the LSCW altered the sandstone wettability towards the neutral wet condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信