在养老院应对COVID-19的国家政策

Q2 Health Professions
C. V. Van Houtven, K. Miller, Rebecca J Gorges, H. Campbell, W. Dawson, J. McHugh, Brian E. McGarry, Ryan Gilmartin, N. Boucher, B. Kaufman, L. Chisholm, S. Beltran, S. Fashaw, Xiaochuan Wang, Olivia Reneau, A. Chun, Joseph W. Jacobs, Kathleen Abrahamson, K. Unroe, C. Bishop, G. Arling, Sheila Kelly, R. Werner, R. Konetzka, E. Norton
{"title":"在养老院应对COVID-19的国家政策","authors":"C. V. Van Houtven, K. Miller, Rebecca J Gorges, H. Campbell, W. Dawson, J. McHugh, Brian E. McGarry, Ryan Gilmartin, N. Boucher, B. Kaufman, L. Chisholm, S. Beltran, S. Fashaw, Xiaochuan Wang, Olivia Reneau, A. Chun, Joseph W. Jacobs, Kathleen Abrahamson, K. Unroe, C. Bishop, G. Arling, Sheila Kelly, R. Werner, R. Konetzka, E. Norton","doi":"10.31389/jltc.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: COVID-19 has a high case fatality rate in high-risk populations and can cause severe morbidity and high healthcare resource use. Nursing home residents are a high-risk population; they live in congregate settings, often with shared rooms, and require hands-on care. Objectives: To assess state responses to the coronavirus pandemic related to nursing homes in the first half of 2020. Methods: An in-depth examination of 12 states’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in nursing homes through June 2020, using publicly reported information such as government decrees, health department guidance, and news reports. Findings: No state emerged as a model of care. All states faced difficulty with limited availability of testing and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). State-level efforts to increase pay and benefits as a strategy to enable infected staff to quickly physically separate from residents were minimal, and other separation strategies depended on the ability to obtain test results rapidly and on state rules regarding accepting discharged COVID-19 patients into nursing homes. Visitor restrictions to reduce risk were ubiquitous, though based on a slim evidence-base. Limitations: The information used was limited to that which was publicly available. Implications: Overall, the results suggest that the states that handle the ongoing pandemic in nursing homes best will be those that find ways to make sure nursing homes have the resources to follow best practices for testing, PPE, separation, and staffing. Evidence is needed on visitor restrictions and trans mission, as states and their citizens would benefit from finding safe ways to relax visitor restrictions.","PeriodicalId":73807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Policy Responses to COVID-19 in Nursing Homes\",\"authors\":\"C. V. Van Houtven, K. Miller, Rebecca J Gorges, H. Campbell, W. Dawson, J. McHugh, Brian E. McGarry, Ryan Gilmartin, N. Boucher, B. Kaufman, L. Chisholm, S. Beltran, S. Fashaw, Xiaochuan Wang, Olivia Reneau, A. Chun, Joseph W. Jacobs, Kathleen Abrahamson, K. Unroe, C. Bishop, G. Arling, Sheila Kelly, R. Werner, R. Konetzka, E. Norton\",\"doi\":\"10.31389/jltc.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: COVID-19 has a high case fatality rate in high-risk populations and can cause severe morbidity and high healthcare resource use. Nursing home residents are a high-risk population; they live in congregate settings, often with shared rooms, and require hands-on care. Objectives: To assess state responses to the coronavirus pandemic related to nursing homes in the first half of 2020. Methods: An in-depth examination of 12 states’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in nursing homes through June 2020, using publicly reported information such as government decrees, health department guidance, and news reports. Findings: No state emerged as a model of care. All states faced difficulty with limited availability of testing and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). State-level efforts to increase pay and benefits as a strategy to enable infected staff to quickly physically separate from residents were minimal, and other separation strategies depended on the ability to obtain test results rapidly and on state rules regarding accepting discharged COVID-19 patients into nursing homes. Visitor restrictions to reduce risk were ubiquitous, though based on a slim evidence-base. Limitations: The information used was limited to that which was publicly available. Implications: Overall, the results suggest that the states that handle the ongoing pandemic in nursing homes best will be those that find ways to make sure nursing homes have the resources to follow best practices for testing, PPE, separation, and staffing. Evidence is needed on visitor restrictions and trans mission, as states and their citizens would benefit from finding safe ways to relax visitor restrictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:COVID-19在高危人群中病死率高,可导致严重发病率和高医疗资源使用量。养老院居民是高危人群;他们住在集体环境中,通常共用房间,需要亲自照顾。目的:评估2020年上半年各州对与养老院相关的冠状病毒大流行的反应。方法:利用政府法令、卫生部门指导和新闻报道等公开报道的信息,深入研究了截至2020年6月12个州在养老院应对COVID-19大流行的情况。研究结果:没有一个州成为护理模式。所有州都面临检测和个人防护装备有限的困难。州一级为使受感染的工作人员能够迅速与居民物理分离而增加工资和福利的努力很少,其他分离策略取决于快速获得检测结果的能力以及州关于接受出院的COVID-19患者进入养老院的规定。为降低风险而限制游客的做法无处不在,尽管证据基础薄弱。局限性:所使用的信息仅限于可公开获得的信息。影响:总体而言,结果表明,在养老院中处理持续大流行的最好的州将是那些找到方法确保养老院有资源遵循测试、个人防护装备、分离和人员配置的最佳做法的州。需要关于访客限制和传播的证据,因为找到放松访客限制的安全方法将使各州及其公民受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Policy Responses to COVID-19 in Nursing Homes
Context: COVID-19 has a high case fatality rate in high-risk populations and can cause severe morbidity and high healthcare resource use. Nursing home residents are a high-risk population; they live in congregate settings, often with shared rooms, and require hands-on care. Objectives: To assess state responses to the coronavirus pandemic related to nursing homes in the first half of 2020. Methods: An in-depth examination of 12 states’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in nursing homes through June 2020, using publicly reported information such as government decrees, health department guidance, and news reports. Findings: No state emerged as a model of care. All states faced difficulty with limited availability of testing and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). State-level efforts to increase pay and benefits as a strategy to enable infected staff to quickly physically separate from residents were minimal, and other separation strategies depended on the ability to obtain test results rapidly and on state rules regarding accepting discharged COVID-19 patients into nursing homes. Visitor restrictions to reduce risk were ubiquitous, though based on a slim evidence-base. Limitations: The information used was limited to that which was publicly available. Implications: Overall, the results suggest that the states that handle the ongoing pandemic in nursing homes best will be those that find ways to make sure nursing homes have the resources to follow best practices for testing, PPE, separation, and staffing. Evidence is needed on visitor restrictions and trans mission, as states and their citizens would benefit from finding safe ways to relax visitor restrictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信