过程生态学:事务世界观

R. Ulanowicz
{"title":"过程生态学:事务世界观","authors":"R. Ulanowicz","doi":"10.2495/ECO-V1-N2-114-125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A traditional presupposition in science is that nature ultimately is simple and comprehensible. Accordingly, ‘theory reduction’ is a primary goal in much of ecosystems science – the belief, for example, that ecosystem development can be described by a single covering principle. Recently, however, the theory of complex adaptive systems has challenged the assumption that simplicity is ubiquitous. While students of complexity theory recognize individual constraints that orient ecosystem development, they are skeptical of the urge to identify a single, monistic principle that governs all ecosystem behavior. One approach, called ‘process ecology’, depicts ecosystem development as arising out of at least two antagonistic trends via what is analogous to a dialectic: one direction is the entropic tendency towards disorganization and decay, which can involve singular events that defy quantification via probability theory. Opposing this ineluctable drift are self-entailing configurations of processes that engender positive feedback or autocatalysis, which in turn imparts structure and regularity to ecosystems. The status of the transactions between the two trends can be gauged using information theory and is expressed in two complementary terms called the system ‘overhead’ and ‘ascendency’, respectively. Process ecology provides an opportunity to approach some contemporary enigmas, such as the origin of life, in a more accommodating light.","PeriodicalId":13902,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","volume":"39 1","pages":"114-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process ecology: A transactional worldview\",\"authors\":\"R. Ulanowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/ECO-V1-N2-114-125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A traditional presupposition in science is that nature ultimately is simple and comprehensible. Accordingly, ‘theory reduction’ is a primary goal in much of ecosystems science – the belief, for example, that ecosystem development can be described by a single covering principle. Recently, however, the theory of complex adaptive systems has challenged the assumption that simplicity is ubiquitous. While students of complexity theory recognize individual constraints that orient ecosystem development, they are skeptical of the urge to identify a single, monistic principle that governs all ecosystem behavior. One approach, called ‘process ecology’, depicts ecosystem development as arising out of at least two antagonistic trends via what is analogous to a dialectic: one direction is the entropic tendency towards disorganization and decay, which can involve singular events that defy quantification via probability theory. Opposing this ineluctable drift are self-entailing configurations of processes that engender positive feedback or autocatalysis, which in turn imparts structure and regularity to ecosystems. The status of the transactions between the two trends can be gauged using information theory and is expressed in two complementary terms called the system ‘overhead’ and ‘ascendency’, respectively. Process ecology provides an opportunity to approach some contemporary enigmas, such as the origin of life, in a more accommodating light.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"114-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO-V1-N2-114-125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO-V1-N2-114-125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

科学的一个传统前提是,自然最终是简单易懂的。因此,“理论还原”是许多生态系统科学的一个主要目标——例如,相信生态系统的发展可以用一个覆盖原则来描述。然而,最近,复杂适应系统理论挑战了简单性无处不在的假设。虽然复杂性理论的学生认识到生态系统发展的个体约束,但他们对确定一个单一的、一元论的原则来支配所有生态系统行为的冲动持怀疑态度。一种称为“过程生态学”的方法,将生态系统的发展描述为通过类似于辩证法的至少两种对立趋势产生的:一个方向是无序和衰变的熵趋势,这可能涉及无法通过概率论量化的单一事件。与这种不可避免的漂移相反的是产生正反馈或自催化的过程的自包含配置,这反过来又赋予生态系统结构和规律性。这两种趋势之间的交易状态可以用信息论来衡量,并分别用两个互补的术语表示,即系统“开销”和“优势”。过程生态学提供了一个机会来接近一些当代的谜题,如生命的起源,在一个更包容的光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process ecology: A transactional worldview
A traditional presupposition in science is that nature ultimately is simple and comprehensible. Accordingly, ‘theory reduction’ is a primary goal in much of ecosystems science – the belief, for example, that ecosystem development can be described by a single covering principle. Recently, however, the theory of complex adaptive systems has challenged the assumption that simplicity is ubiquitous. While students of complexity theory recognize individual constraints that orient ecosystem development, they are skeptical of the urge to identify a single, monistic principle that governs all ecosystem behavior. One approach, called ‘process ecology’, depicts ecosystem development as arising out of at least two antagonistic trends via what is analogous to a dialectic: one direction is the entropic tendency towards disorganization and decay, which can involve singular events that defy quantification via probability theory. Opposing this ineluctable drift are self-entailing configurations of processes that engender positive feedback or autocatalysis, which in turn imparts structure and regularity to ecosystems. The status of the transactions between the two trends can be gauged using information theory and is expressed in two complementary terms called the system ‘overhead’ and ‘ascendency’, respectively. Process ecology provides an opportunity to approach some contemporary enigmas, such as the origin of life, in a more accommodating light.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信