“抱着我,格蒂,抱着我”:莉莉·巴特的《奇异欲望》

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
H. Champion
{"title":"“抱着我,格蒂,抱着我”:莉莉·巴特的《奇异欲望》","authors":"H. Champion","doi":"10.5325/editwharrevi.35.2.0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In her provocatively titled article from 2007, Katherine Joslin asks \"Is Lily Gay?\" Such a line of questioning is part of the queer turn in Wharton scholarship, which aims to complicate traditional criticism often based on heterosexual or binary assumptions. This study uses Joslin's bold and exciting question as a starting point in an effort to extend the argument further. It proposes a queer reading of The House of Mirth that takes into consideration Edith Wharton's own contradictory attitudes toward queer sexuality, situating the text within historical notions of queerness from the turn of the century. Lily Bart is then \"queered\" through the use of Georg Simmel's theories of flirtation, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's literary love triangles, and close readings of the novel's \"queer episodes\" that tease out the meanings behind Wharton's sensual language. The study predominantly questions Lily's failure to cooperate with fixed notions of futurity—in this case signified by marriage—proposing that this refusal serves to destabilize linear heteronormative growth and positions her in a state of queered flux. Such a reading therefore attempts to reconsider traditional heteronormative understandings of The House of Mirth.","PeriodicalId":40904,"journal":{"name":"Edith Wharton Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"118 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Hold me, Gerty, hold me\\\": Lily Bart's Queer Desire\",\"authors\":\"H. Champion\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/editwharrevi.35.2.0096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In her provocatively titled article from 2007, Katherine Joslin asks \\\"Is Lily Gay?\\\" Such a line of questioning is part of the queer turn in Wharton scholarship, which aims to complicate traditional criticism often based on heterosexual or binary assumptions. This study uses Joslin's bold and exciting question as a starting point in an effort to extend the argument further. It proposes a queer reading of The House of Mirth that takes into consideration Edith Wharton's own contradictory attitudes toward queer sexuality, situating the text within historical notions of queerness from the turn of the century. Lily Bart is then \\\"queered\\\" through the use of Georg Simmel's theories of flirtation, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's literary love triangles, and close readings of the novel's \\\"queer episodes\\\" that tease out the meanings behind Wharton's sensual language. The study predominantly questions Lily's failure to cooperate with fixed notions of futurity—in this case signified by marriage—proposing that this refusal serves to destabilize linear heteronormative growth and positions her in a state of queered flux. Such a reading therefore attempts to reconsider traditional heteronormative understandings of The House of Mirth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edith Wharton Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"118 - 96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edith Wharton Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/editwharrevi.35.2.0096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edith Wharton Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/editwharrevi.35.2.0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在凯瑟琳•乔斯林2007年发表的一篇标题颇具煽动性的文章中,她问道:“莉莉是同性恋吗?”这样的质疑是沃顿奖学金酷儿转向的一部分,其目的是使通常基于异性恋或二元假设的传统批评复杂化。本研究以乔斯林大胆而令人兴奋的问题为出发点,试图进一步扩展这一论点。它提出了对《欢乐之家》的酷儿解读,考虑到伊迪丝·沃顿自己对酷儿性行为的矛盾态度,将文本置于世纪之交的酷儿历史观念中。然后,莉莉·巴特通过乔治·齐美尔的调情理论,伊芙·科索夫斯基·塞奇威克的文学三角恋,以及仔细阅读小说中的“酷儿情节”,梳理出沃顿性感语言背后的含义,成为“酷儿”。这项研究主要质疑莉莉对未来的固定观念的不配合——在这个例子中,婚姻代表了未来——提出这种拒绝会破坏异性恋的线性成长,使她处于一种同性恋的不稳定状态。因此,这种解读试图重新考虑对《欢乐之家》的传统非正统理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Hold me, Gerty, hold me": Lily Bart's Queer Desire
Abstract:In her provocatively titled article from 2007, Katherine Joslin asks "Is Lily Gay?" Such a line of questioning is part of the queer turn in Wharton scholarship, which aims to complicate traditional criticism often based on heterosexual or binary assumptions. This study uses Joslin's bold and exciting question as a starting point in an effort to extend the argument further. It proposes a queer reading of The House of Mirth that takes into consideration Edith Wharton's own contradictory attitudes toward queer sexuality, situating the text within historical notions of queerness from the turn of the century. Lily Bart is then "queered" through the use of Georg Simmel's theories of flirtation, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's literary love triangles, and close readings of the novel's "queer episodes" that tease out the meanings behind Wharton's sensual language. The study predominantly questions Lily's failure to cooperate with fixed notions of futurity—in this case signified by marriage—proposing that this refusal serves to destabilize linear heteronormative growth and positions her in a state of queered flux. Such a reading therefore attempts to reconsider traditional heteronormative understandings of The House of Mirth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Edith Wharton Review
Edith Wharton Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信