反感的结构

Jens Kjeldgaard‐Christiansen
{"title":"反感的结构","authors":"Jens Kjeldgaard‐Christiansen","doi":"10.3167/PROJ.2019.130105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many narrative films feature villains, major characters that audiences\nare meant to condemn. This article investigates the cognitive-affective\nunderpinnings of audience antipathy in order to shed light on how filmic villainy\nis constructed. To that end, the article introduces an analytical framework\nat the intersection of cognitive film theory and moral psychology. The\nframework analyzes villainy into three categories: guilty intentionality, consequential\naction, and causal responsibility.","PeriodicalId":93495,"journal":{"name":"Projections (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Structure of Antipathy\",\"authors\":\"Jens Kjeldgaard‐Christiansen\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/PROJ.2019.130105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many narrative films feature villains, major characters that audiences\\nare meant to condemn. This article investigates the cognitive-affective\\nunderpinnings of audience antipathy in order to shed light on how filmic villainy\\nis constructed. To that end, the article introduces an analytical framework\\nat the intersection of cognitive film theory and moral psychology. The\\nframework analyzes villainy into three categories: guilty intentionality, consequential\\naction, and causal responsibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Projections (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Projections (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/PROJ.2019.130105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Projections (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/PROJ.2019.130105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多叙事电影都有反派角色,这些主要角色是观众想要谴责的。本文调查了观众反感的认知-情感基础,以阐明电影中的反派是如何构建的。为此,本文引入了认知电影理论与道德心理学交叉的分析框架。该框架将恶行分析为三类:有罪故意、后果行为和因果责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Structure of Antipathy
Many narrative films feature villains, major characters that audiences are meant to condemn. This article investigates the cognitive-affective underpinnings of audience antipathy in order to shed light on how filmic villainy is constructed. To that end, the article introduces an analytical framework at the intersection of cognitive film theory and moral psychology. The framework analyzes villainy into three categories: guilty intentionality, consequential action, and causal responsibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信