澳大利亚老年人华法林与他汀类药物和质子泵抑制剂的联合处方

Svetla Gadzhanova, E. Roughead
{"title":"澳大利亚老年人华法林与他汀类药物和质子泵抑制剂的联合处方","authors":"Svetla Gadzhanova, E. Roughead","doi":"10.4172/2167-1052.1000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Comorbidity is common in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF). The predominant treatment for AF is warfarin and medicine interactions with warfarin represent a challenge for optimising treatment of AF in older people with comorbidities. Statins and Proton Pump Inhibitors are commonly prescribed therapies and in both classes, there are medicines with greater or lesser potential to interact with warfarin. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine use of antithrombotic treatment in elderly Australians, and the extent of concurrent use of interacting statins and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with warfarin. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs. The cohort included all patients who had at least one hospitalisation with a primary diagnosis for AF between 2007 and 2011. Individuals contributed person-months from the date of first AF hospitalisation to death or end of study (December 2011). Monthly utilisation of antithrombotics was assessed. A sub-cohort of warfarin users was defined as those with AF who received warfarin as monotherapy and the proportions of those co-dispensed statins or PPIs were established. Results: Around 70% of patients with AF were receiving antithrombotic treatment, with 35% dispensed warfarin, 17% aspirin, and 7% clopidogrel as monotherapy. In December 2011, 54% of patients with AF on warfarin monotherapy were co-dispensed a statin, with the statins with potential for interaction dispensed at highest rates; atorvastatin followed by simvastatin and rosuvastatin. At study end, 43% of the warfarin cohort were also dispensed PPIs, with one-third using esomeprazole, followed by pantoprazole, both of which have the potential to interact with warfarin. Conclusion: 30% of patients with AF were not receiving antithrombotic treatment. In those receiving an antithrombotic agent, warfarin was the most commonly dispensed (35%). The most common statin and PPI coprescribed with warfarin were agents with the potential to interact with warfarin, despite alternative agents being available. Raising awareness of the safer alternative for people with comorbidities may improve warfarin management.","PeriodicalId":7385,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-prescribing of Warfarin with Statins and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Elderly Australians\",\"authors\":\"Svetla Gadzhanova, E. Roughead\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-1052.1000161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Comorbidity is common in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF). The predominant treatment for AF is warfarin and medicine interactions with warfarin represent a challenge for optimising treatment of AF in older people with comorbidities. Statins and Proton Pump Inhibitors are commonly prescribed therapies and in both classes, there are medicines with greater or lesser potential to interact with warfarin. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine use of antithrombotic treatment in elderly Australians, and the extent of concurrent use of interacting statins and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with warfarin. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs. The cohort included all patients who had at least one hospitalisation with a primary diagnosis for AF between 2007 and 2011. Individuals contributed person-months from the date of first AF hospitalisation to death or end of study (December 2011). Monthly utilisation of antithrombotics was assessed. A sub-cohort of warfarin users was defined as those with AF who received warfarin as monotherapy and the proportions of those co-dispensed statins or PPIs were established. Results: Around 70% of patients with AF were receiving antithrombotic treatment, with 35% dispensed warfarin, 17% aspirin, and 7% clopidogrel as monotherapy. In December 2011, 54% of patients with AF on warfarin monotherapy were co-dispensed a statin, with the statins with potential for interaction dispensed at highest rates; atorvastatin followed by simvastatin and rosuvastatin. At study end, 43% of the warfarin cohort were also dispensed PPIs, with one-third using esomeprazole, followed by pantoprazole, both of which have the potential to interact with warfarin. Conclusion: 30% of patients with AF were not receiving antithrombotic treatment. In those receiving an antithrombotic agent, warfarin was the most commonly dispensed (35%). The most common statin and PPI coprescribed with warfarin were agents with the potential to interact with warfarin, despite alternative agents being available. Raising awareness of the safer alternative for people with comorbidities may improve warfarin management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1052.1000161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:合并症在房颤(AF)患者中很常见。心房颤动的主要治疗方法是华法林,与华法林的药物相互作用对有合并症的老年人心房颤动的优化治疗提出了挑战。他汀类药物和质子泵抑制剂是常用的处方疗法,在这两类药物中,都有或多或少与华法林相互作用的可能性。目的:本研究的目的是检查澳大利亚老年人抗血栓治疗的使用情况,以及他汀类药物和质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)与华法林同时使用的程度。方法:采用澳大利亚政府退伍军人事务部的数据进行回顾性队列研究。该队列包括所有在2007年至2011年间至少有一次初步诊断为房颤住院治疗的患者。从首次房颤住院之日起至死亡或研究结束(2011年12月),个人贡献的人月数。评估每月抗血栓药物的使用情况。华法林使用者的亚队列定义为接受华法林单药治疗的房颤患者,并确定联合配用他汀类药物或PPIs的比例。结果:大约70%的房颤患者正在接受抗血栓治疗,其中35%的患者使用华法林,17%的患者使用阿司匹林,7%的患者使用氯吡格雷进行单药治疗。2011年12月,54%接受华法林单药治疗的房颤患者同时配用了他汀类药物,其中配用可能发生相互作用的他汀类药物的比例最高;阿托伐他汀,其次是辛伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀。在研究结束时,43%的华法林队列患者也使用PPIs,其中三分之一使用埃索美拉唑,其次是泮托拉唑,这两种药物都有可能与华法林相互作用。结论:30%的房颤患者未接受抗栓治疗。在接受抗血栓药物治疗的患者中,华法林是最常用的(35%)。与华法林共同使用的最常见的他汀类药物和PPI是有可能与华法林相互作用的药物,尽管有替代药物可用。提高对合并症患者的安全替代方案的认识可能会改善华法林的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-prescribing of Warfarin with Statins and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Elderly Australians
Background: Comorbidity is common in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF). The predominant treatment for AF is warfarin and medicine interactions with warfarin represent a challenge for optimising treatment of AF in older people with comorbidities. Statins and Proton Pump Inhibitors are commonly prescribed therapies and in both classes, there are medicines with greater or lesser potential to interact with warfarin. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine use of antithrombotic treatment in elderly Australians, and the extent of concurrent use of interacting statins and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with warfarin. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs. The cohort included all patients who had at least one hospitalisation with a primary diagnosis for AF between 2007 and 2011. Individuals contributed person-months from the date of first AF hospitalisation to death or end of study (December 2011). Monthly utilisation of antithrombotics was assessed. A sub-cohort of warfarin users was defined as those with AF who received warfarin as monotherapy and the proportions of those co-dispensed statins or PPIs were established. Results: Around 70% of patients with AF were receiving antithrombotic treatment, with 35% dispensed warfarin, 17% aspirin, and 7% clopidogrel as monotherapy. In December 2011, 54% of patients with AF on warfarin monotherapy were co-dispensed a statin, with the statins with potential for interaction dispensed at highest rates; atorvastatin followed by simvastatin and rosuvastatin. At study end, 43% of the warfarin cohort were also dispensed PPIs, with one-third using esomeprazole, followed by pantoprazole, both of which have the potential to interact with warfarin. Conclusion: 30% of patients with AF were not receiving antithrombotic treatment. In those receiving an antithrombotic agent, warfarin was the most commonly dispensed (35%). The most common statin and PPI coprescribed with warfarin were agents with the potential to interact with warfarin, despite alternative agents being available. Raising awareness of the safer alternative for people with comorbidities may improve warfarin management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信