为应对COVID-19大流行,将医院与聚集式养老院整合起来

Christina Chan, Mercedes Magaz, V. Williams, J. Wong, Monica Klein-Nouri, Sid Feldman, Jaclyn O’Brien, Natasha Salt, A. Simor, J. Charles, B. Wong, Steve Shadowitz, K. Fleming, A. Chan, J. Leis
{"title":"为应对COVID-19大流行,将医院与聚集式养老院整合起来","authors":"Christina Chan, Mercedes Magaz, V. Williams, J. Wong, Monica Klein-Nouri, Sid Feldman, Jaclyn O’Brien, Natasha Salt, A. Simor, J. Charles, B. Wong, Steve Shadowitz, K. Fleming, A. Chan, J. Leis","doi":"10.14745/ccdr.v49i23a06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the need to improve the safety of the environments where we care for older adults in Canada. After providing assistance during the first wave, many Ontario hospitals formally partnered with local congregate care homes in a “hub and spoke” model during second pandemic wave onward. The objective of this article is to describe the implementation and longitudinal outcomes of residents in one hub and spoke model composed of a hospital partnered with 18 congregate care homes including four long-term care and 14 retirement or other congregate care homes. Intervention: Homes were provided continuous seven-day per week access to hospital support, including infection prevention and control (IPAC), testing, vaccine delivery and clinical support as needed. Any COVID-19 exposure or transmission triggered a same-day meeting to implement initial control measures. A minimum of weekly on-site visits occurred for long-term care homes and biweekly for other congregate care homes, with up to daily on-site presence during outbreaks. Outcomes: Case detection among residents increased following implementation in context of increased testing, then decreased post-immunization until the Omicron wave when it peaked. After adjusting for the correlation within homes, COVID-related mortality decreased following implementation (OR=0.51, 95% CI, 0.30–0.88; p =0.01). In secondary analysis, homes without pre-existing IPAC programs had higher baseline COVID-related mortality rate (OR=19.19, 95% CI, 4.66–79.02; p <0.001) and saw a larger overall decrease during implementation (3.76% to 0.37%–0.98%) as compared to homes with pre-existing IPAC programs (0.21% to 0.57%– 0.90%). Conclusion: The outcomes for older adults residing in congregate care homes improved steadily throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While this finding is multifactorial, integration with a local hospital partner supported key interventions known to protect residents.","PeriodicalId":33496,"journal":{"name":"Canada Communicable Disease Report","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of hospital with congregate care homes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Christina Chan, Mercedes Magaz, V. Williams, J. Wong, Monica Klein-Nouri, Sid Feldman, Jaclyn O’Brien, Natasha Salt, A. Simor, J. Charles, B. Wong, Steve Shadowitz, K. Fleming, A. Chan, J. Leis\",\"doi\":\"10.14745/ccdr.v49i23a06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the need to improve the safety of the environments where we care for older adults in Canada. After providing assistance during the first wave, many Ontario hospitals formally partnered with local congregate care homes in a “hub and spoke” model during second pandemic wave onward. The objective of this article is to describe the implementation and longitudinal outcomes of residents in one hub and spoke model composed of a hospital partnered with 18 congregate care homes including four long-term care and 14 retirement or other congregate care homes. Intervention: Homes were provided continuous seven-day per week access to hospital support, including infection prevention and control (IPAC), testing, vaccine delivery and clinical support as needed. Any COVID-19 exposure or transmission triggered a same-day meeting to implement initial control measures. A minimum of weekly on-site visits occurred for long-term care homes and biweekly for other congregate care homes, with up to daily on-site presence during outbreaks. Outcomes: Case detection among residents increased following implementation in context of increased testing, then decreased post-immunization until the Omicron wave when it peaked. After adjusting for the correlation within homes, COVID-related mortality decreased following implementation (OR=0.51, 95% CI, 0.30–0.88; p =0.01). In secondary analysis, homes without pre-existing IPAC programs had higher baseline COVID-related mortality rate (OR=19.19, 95% CI, 4.66–79.02; p <0.001) and saw a larger overall decrease during implementation (3.76% to 0.37%–0.98%) as compared to homes with pre-existing IPAC programs (0.21% to 0.57%– 0.90%). Conclusion: The outcomes for older adults residing in congregate care homes improved steadily throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While this finding is multifactorial, integration with a local hospital partner supported key interventions known to protect residents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canada Communicable Disease Report\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canada Communicable Disease Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v49i23a06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canada Communicable Disease Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v49i23a06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行凸显了改善加拿大老年人护理环境安全性的必要性。在第一波大流行期间提供援助后,安大略省的许多医院在第二波大流行期间以“中心和辐射式”模式与当地的集体护养院正式合作。本文的目的是描述医院与18家集体护养院(包括4家长期护养院和14家退休或其他集体护养院)合作组成的一个中心和辐状模型的实施和纵向结果。干预措施:每周7天连续向家庭提供医院支助,包括感染预防和控制、检测、提供疫苗和必要的临床支助。任何COVID-19暴露或传播都引发了当天的会议,以实施初步控制措施。长期护理院每周至少进行一次现场访问,其他聚集式护理院每两周进行一次,在疫情爆发期间每天进行一次现场访问。结果:在加强检测的情况下,居民病例检出率在实施后增加,然后在免疫后下降,直到欧米克朗波达到顶峰。在调整了家庭内部的相关性后,实施后与covid相关的死亡率下降(OR=0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.88;p = 0.01)。在二次分析中,没有预先存在IPAC计划的家庭与covid相关的基线死亡率更高(OR=19.19, 95% CI, 4.66-79.02;p <0.001),与已有IPAC计划的家庭(0.21%至0.57%至0.90%)相比,在实施期间总体下降幅度更大(3.76%至0.37%至0.98%)。结论:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,居住在集体养老院的老年人的结局稳步改善。虽然这一发现是多因素的,但与当地医院合作伙伴的整合支持了已知的保护居民的关键干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integration of hospital with congregate care homes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the need to improve the safety of the environments where we care for older adults in Canada. After providing assistance during the first wave, many Ontario hospitals formally partnered with local congregate care homes in a “hub and spoke” model during second pandemic wave onward. The objective of this article is to describe the implementation and longitudinal outcomes of residents in one hub and spoke model composed of a hospital partnered with 18 congregate care homes including four long-term care and 14 retirement or other congregate care homes. Intervention: Homes were provided continuous seven-day per week access to hospital support, including infection prevention and control (IPAC), testing, vaccine delivery and clinical support as needed. Any COVID-19 exposure or transmission triggered a same-day meeting to implement initial control measures. A minimum of weekly on-site visits occurred for long-term care homes and biweekly for other congregate care homes, with up to daily on-site presence during outbreaks. Outcomes: Case detection among residents increased following implementation in context of increased testing, then decreased post-immunization until the Omicron wave when it peaked. After adjusting for the correlation within homes, COVID-related mortality decreased following implementation (OR=0.51, 95% CI, 0.30–0.88; p =0.01). In secondary analysis, homes without pre-existing IPAC programs had higher baseline COVID-related mortality rate (OR=19.19, 95% CI, 4.66–79.02; p <0.001) and saw a larger overall decrease during implementation (3.76% to 0.37%–0.98%) as compared to homes with pre-existing IPAC programs (0.21% to 0.57%– 0.90%). Conclusion: The outcomes for older adults residing in congregate care homes improved steadily throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While this finding is multifactorial, integration with a local hospital partner supported key interventions known to protect residents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信