手钳在剖宫产术中用于浮头娩出的随机试验研究[j]

Xuezhi Jiang, Jonathan Rodger, G. Tegos, Rebecca Wu
{"title":"手钳在剖宫产术中用于浮头娩出的随机试验研究[j]","authors":"Xuezhi Jiang, Jonathan Rodger, G. Tegos, Rebecca Wu","doi":"10.1097/01.AOG.0000930456.01286.8e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: On occasion, obstetricians encounter difficulty delivering the floating fetal head at cesarean section; additional techniques may need to be employed beyond the traditional one-handed delivery technique. We propose a modified two-handed manual delivery method or “hand forceps,” with surgeon’s both hands shaped like a pair of forceps, as an alternative technique for fetal head delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two-handed technique by comparing with the traditional one-handed technique. METHODS: We conducted a randomized pilot study of women undergoing cesarean section (NCT04159857, ClinicalTrials.gov). Inclusion criteria included a singleton in cephalic presentation, at gestational age of 37 weeks or greater, with planned low transverse uterine incision, cervical dilation of 6 cm or lower and station less than −3. Patients were randomized to either the one-handed or two-handed delivery group. The primary outcome was “U-D interval,” defined as the time from entry of the hands into the uterus to the delivery of the fetal head. The secondary outcome was incidence of hysterotomy extension. Neonatal safety data were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients participated in the study; 16 randomized to the one-handed group, 19 randomized to the two-handed group, and 5 patients excluded because of protocol deviation. U-D interval (mean±SD) was significantly shorter in the two-handed group (6.0±7.4 seconds) than in the one-handed group (14.3±9.9 seconds), P<.001. There was no significant difference in incidence of hysterotomy extension, maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The two-handed method for fetal head delivery has a significantly decreased U-D interval compared to the one-handed method, without increasing the incidence of hysterotomy extension. A large-scale multicenter randomized controlled study is needed to further determine whether the “hand forceps” can be considered a safe alternative technique for delivery of the floating fetal head in cesarean sections.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand Forceps for Delivery of Floating Fetal Head at Cesarean Section: A Randomized Pilot Study [ID: 1375984]\",\"authors\":\"Xuezhi Jiang, Jonathan Rodger, G. Tegos, Rebecca Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.AOG.0000930456.01286.8e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: On occasion, obstetricians encounter difficulty delivering the floating fetal head at cesarean section; additional techniques may need to be employed beyond the traditional one-handed delivery technique. We propose a modified two-handed manual delivery method or “hand forceps,” with surgeon’s both hands shaped like a pair of forceps, as an alternative technique for fetal head delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two-handed technique by comparing with the traditional one-handed technique. METHODS: We conducted a randomized pilot study of women undergoing cesarean section (NCT04159857, ClinicalTrials.gov). Inclusion criteria included a singleton in cephalic presentation, at gestational age of 37 weeks or greater, with planned low transverse uterine incision, cervical dilation of 6 cm or lower and station less than −3. Patients were randomized to either the one-handed or two-handed delivery group. The primary outcome was “U-D interval,” defined as the time from entry of the hands into the uterus to the delivery of the fetal head. The secondary outcome was incidence of hysterotomy extension. Neonatal safety data were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients participated in the study; 16 randomized to the one-handed group, 19 randomized to the two-handed group, and 5 patients excluded because of protocol deviation. U-D interval (mean±SD) was significantly shorter in the two-handed group (6.0±7.4 seconds) than in the one-handed group (14.3±9.9 seconds), P<.001. There was no significant difference in incidence of hysterotomy extension, maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The two-handed method for fetal head delivery has a significantly decreased U-D interval compared to the one-handed method, without increasing the incidence of hysterotomy extension. A large-scale multicenter randomized controlled study is needed to further determine whether the “hand forceps” can be considered a safe alternative technique for delivery of the floating fetal head in cesarean sections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000930456.01286.8e\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000930456.01286.8e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:有时,产科医生在剖宫产术中遇到分娩浮胎头的困难;除了传统的单手递送技术之外,可能还需要采用其他技术。我们提出一种改良的双手人工分娩方法或“手钳”,外科医生的双手形状像一对镊子,作为胎儿头部分娩的替代技术。本研究的目的是通过与传统单手手法的比较,比较双手手法的疗效和安全性。方法:我们对接受剖宫产手术的妇女进行了一项随机试点研究(NCT04159857, ClinicalTrials.gov)。纳入标准包括头位单胎,胎龄37周或更大,计划子宫低位横向切口,宫颈扩张6cm或更低,宫颈位小于- 3。患者被随机分为单手或双手分娩组。主要结果是“U-D间隔”,定义为从手进入子宫到胎头娩出的时间。次要观察指标为子宫切开延伸的发生率。还收集了新生儿安全数据。结果:共40例患者参与研究;16例随机分配到单手组,19例随机分配到双手组,5例因方案偏离而被排除。双手组的U-D间隔(平均±SD)(6.0±7.4 s)明显短于单手组(14.3±9.9 s), P< 0.001。两组子宫切开延长发生率、产妇和新生儿结局无显著差异。结论:双手胎头分娩方式与单手胎头分娩方式相比,U-D间隔明显缩短,且未增加剖宫产延长的发生率。需要一项大规模的多中心随机对照研究来进一步确定“手钳”是否可以被认为是一种安全的剖腹产浮胎头的替代技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hand Forceps for Delivery of Floating Fetal Head at Cesarean Section: A Randomized Pilot Study [ID: 1375984]
INTRODUCTION: On occasion, obstetricians encounter difficulty delivering the floating fetal head at cesarean section; additional techniques may need to be employed beyond the traditional one-handed delivery technique. We propose a modified two-handed manual delivery method or “hand forceps,” with surgeon’s both hands shaped like a pair of forceps, as an alternative technique for fetal head delivery. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two-handed technique by comparing with the traditional one-handed technique. METHODS: We conducted a randomized pilot study of women undergoing cesarean section (NCT04159857, ClinicalTrials.gov). Inclusion criteria included a singleton in cephalic presentation, at gestational age of 37 weeks or greater, with planned low transverse uterine incision, cervical dilation of 6 cm or lower and station less than −3. Patients were randomized to either the one-handed or two-handed delivery group. The primary outcome was “U-D interval,” defined as the time from entry of the hands into the uterus to the delivery of the fetal head. The secondary outcome was incidence of hysterotomy extension. Neonatal safety data were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients participated in the study; 16 randomized to the one-handed group, 19 randomized to the two-handed group, and 5 patients excluded because of protocol deviation. U-D interval (mean±SD) was significantly shorter in the two-handed group (6.0±7.4 seconds) than in the one-handed group (14.3±9.9 seconds), P<.001. There was no significant difference in incidence of hysterotomy extension, maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The two-handed method for fetal head delivery has a significantly decreased U-D interval compared to the one-handed method, without increasing the incidence of hysterotomy extension. A large-scale multicenter randomized controlled study is needed to further determine whether the “hand forceps” can be considered a safe alternative technique for delivery of the floating fetal head in cesarean sections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信