使用符号执行的微分故障分析

Jasper van Woudenberg, Cees-Bart Breunesse, Rajesh Velegalati, P. Yalla, Sergio Gonzalez
{"title":"使用符号执行的微分故障分析","authors":"Jasper van Woudenberg, Cees-Bart Breunesse, Rajesh Velegalati, P. Yalla, Sergio Gonzalez","doi":"10.1145/3151137.3151141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential fault analysis (DFA) is a cryptanalytic attack that uses corrupted cipher executions to extract secret/private keys. Traditionally applied in hardware-based systems, it is now being actively used in extracting keys from (whiteboxed) software cipher implementations. Extensive research is published which aims at increasing the efficiency of DFA on symmetric ciphers using fewer number of faulty cipher texts. However, such DFA attacks require manual analysis as a pre-processing step, a fixed guess at the fault model, and can be non-trivial to implement. Algebraic Fault Analysis (AFA) is a class of DFA which overcomes these difficulties by using a combination of algebraic cryptanalysis and DFA to retrieve the secret key. In this paper, we present a methodology which decreases the complexity of performing AFA, by using a symbolic execution engine on a software implementation of the cipher to create constraints which are then fed into a SAT solver. We test our proposed methodology against the AES and DES ciphers using different fault models, and show that under a given fault model, the keys can be extracted with as little as ~2 and ~5 faults respectively.","PeriodicalId":68286,"journal":{"name":"中国安防产品信息","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Fault Analysis Using Symbolic Execution\",\"authors\":\"Jasper van Woudenberg, Cees-Bart Breunesse, Rajesh Velegalati, P. Yalla, Sergio Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3151137.3151141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differential fault analysis (DFA) is a cryptanalytic attack that uses corrupted cipher executions to extract secret/private keys. Traditionally applied in hardware-based systems, it is now being actively used in extracting keys from (whiteboxed) software cipher implementations. Extensive research is published which aims at increasing the efficiency of DFA on symmetric ciphers using fewer number of faulty cipher texts. However, such DFA attacks require manual analysis as a pre-processing step, a fixed guess at the fault model, and can be non-trivial to implement. Algebraic Fault Analysis (AFA) is a class of DFA which overcomes these difficulties by using a combination of algebraic cryptanalysis and DFA to retrieve the secret key. In this paper, we present a methodology which decreases the complexity of performing AFA, by using a symbolic execution engine on a software implementation of the cipher to create constraints which are then fed into a SAT solver. We test our proposed methodology against the AES and DES ciphers using different fault models, and show that under a given fault model, the keys can be extracted with as little as ~2 and ~5 faults respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国安防产品信息\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国安防产品信息\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3151137.3151141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国安防产品信息","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3151137.3151141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

差分故障分析(DFA)是一种密码分析攻击,它使用损坏的密码执行来提取秘密/私钥。传统上应用于基于硬件的系统,现在正积极用于从(白盒)软件密码实现中提取密钥。广泛的研究发表,其目的是提高DFA对对称密码的效率,使用更少的错误密码文本。然而,这样的DFA攻击需要人工分析作为预处理步骤,对故障模型进行固定的猜测,并且很难实现。代数故障分析(AFA)是一种将代数密码分析和DFA相结合来检索密钥的DFA方法,克服了这些困难。在本文中,我们提出了一种降低执行AFA复杂性的方法,通过在密码的软件实现上使用符号执行引擎来创建约束,然后将这些约束馈送到SAT求解器中。我们使用不同的故障模型对AES和DES密码进行了测试,结果表明,在给定的故障模型下,密钥提取分别可以减少到~2和~5个错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Fault Analysis Using Symbolic Execution
Differential fault analysis (DFA) is a cryptanalytic attack that uses corrupted cipher executions to extract secret/private keys. Traditionally applied in hardware-based systems, it is now being actively used in extracting keys from (whiteboxed) software cipher implementations. Extensive research is published which aims at increasing the efficiency of DFA on symmetric ciphers using fewer number of faulty cipher texts. However, such DFA attacks require manual analysis as a pre-processing step, a fixed guess at the fault model, and can be non-trivial to implement. Algebraic Fault Analysis (AFA) is a class of DFA which overcomes these difficulties by using a combination of algebraic cryptanalysis and DFA to retrieve the secret key. In this paper, we present a methodology which decreases the complexity of performing AFA, by using a symbolic execution engine on a software implementation of the cipher to create constraints which are then fed into a SAT solver. We test our proposed methodology against the AES and DES ciphers using different fault models, and show that under a given fault model, the keys can be extracted with as little as ~2 and ~5 faults respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1968
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信