由国家的恩典从一个民族到一个教会:匈牙利犹太正教的另一种观点

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
MODERN JUDAISM Pub Date : 2019-04-10 DOI:10.1093/MJ/KJZ006
Y. Sorek
{"title":"由国家的恩典从一个民族到一个教会:匈牙利犹太正教的另一种观点","authors":"Y. Sorek","doi":"10.1093/MJ/KJZ006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the disintegration of Austria--Hungary in 1918, hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews found themselves as residents of other states—mainly Romania and Czechoslovakia. In this new situation, the question of their national identity became open to debate. Their “Hungarianess” having been rendered all but irrelevant, the option of a Jewish national identity became increasingly attractive, strengthened by a zeitgeist in which the notion of national self-determination was leading to the creation of new states, and groups (like the Jews), unable to claim an independent territory, were gaining recognition as “national minorities.” By the same token, Jewish national aspirations found reinforcement through decisions being made by the great powers through the instrument of the League of Nations, which in 1920 granted to Britain an internationally backed mandate with the aim of establishing in Palestine a “national home for the Jewish people.” Among two groups of Jews in particular the collapse of Hungarian national identity created a deep crisis. The first group was the highly assimilated, whose decades-long effort to adopt the Hungarian language and culture and to become integrated into Hungarian society had been nullified at a single blow. For all practical purposes, their Magyar identification went from being an advantage to being a burden—and a potential source of danger. The second group, less to be expected, was the Orthodox. Known for their anti-assimilationist ideology, they might have been thought prime candidates for Jewish nationalism. Yet they fought fiercely against it because they regarded Jewish nationalism as a threat to the Orthodox ethos which was built on the concept of separation from other Jews on the basis of religious doctrine and practice. In 1919, now cut off from the Orthodox central office in Budapest, a number of prominent rabbis in Slovakia formed the “Central Bureau of Slovak Orthodox Congregations.” (The Czech communities, which lacked an organized Orthodoxy, were ignored.) A similar move took place in","PeriodicalId":54089,"journal":{"name":"MODERN JUDAISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From a People to a Church by the Grace of the State: Another View of Hungarian Jewish Orthodoxy\",\"authors\":\"Y. Sorek\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/MJ/KJZ006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the disintegration of Austria--Hungary in 1918, hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews found themselves as residents of other states—mainly Romania and Czechoslovakia. In this new situation, the question of their national identity became open to debate. Their “Hungarianess” having been rendered all but irrelevant, the option of a Jewish national identity became increasingly attractive, strengthened by a zeitgeist in which the notion of national self-determination was leading to the creation of new states, and groups (like the Jews), unable to claim an independent territory, were gaining recognition as “national minorities.” By the same token, Jewish national aspirations found reinforcement through decisions being made by the great powers through the instrument of the League of Nations, which in 1920 granted to Britain an internationally backed mandate with the aim of establishing in Palestine a “national home for the Jewish people.” Among two groups of Jews in particular the collapse of Hungarian national identity created a deep crisis. The first group was the highly assimilated, whose decades-long effort to adopt the Hungarian language and culture and to become integrated into Hungarian society had been nullified at a single blow. For all practical purposes, their Magyar identification went from being an advantage to being a burden—and a potential source of danger. The second group, less to be expected, was the Orthodox. Known for their anti-assimilationist ideology, they might have been thought prime candidates for Jewish nationalism. Yet they fought fiercely against it because they regarded Jewish nationalism as a threat to the Orthodox ethos which was built on the concept of separation from other Jews on the basis of religious doctrine and practice. In 1919, now cut off from the Orthodox central office in Budapest, a number of prominent rabbis in Slovakia formed the “Central Bureau of Slovak Orthodox Congregations.” (The Czech communities, which lacked an organized Orthodoxy, were ignored.) A similar move took place in\",\"PeriodicalId\":54089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODERN JUDAISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODERN JUDAISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/MJ/KJZ006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN JUDAISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MJ/KJZ006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

1918年奥地利-匈牙利解体后,成千上万的匈牙利犹太人发现自己成为其他国家的居民,主要是罗马尼亚和捷克斯洛伐克。在这种新形势下,他们的民族特性问题成为可以辩论的问题。他们的“匈牙利性”已经变得无关紧要,犹太民族身份的选择变得越来越有吸引力,民族自决的概念正在导致新国家的建立,而无法要求独立领土的群体(如犹太人)正在获得“少数民族”的承认,这种时代精神加强了这种选择。出于同样的原因,犹太民族的愿望通过大国通过国际联盟的工具做出的决定得到了加强。1920年,国际联盟授权英国在巴勒斯坦建立一个“犹太人的民族家园”。特别是在两个犹太人群体中,匈牙利民族认同的崩溃造成了深刻的危机。第一个群体是高度同化的人,他们几十年来接受匈牙利语言和文化并融入匈牙利社会的努力一下子化为乌有。出于所有实际目的,他们的马扎尔身份从一个优势变成了一个负担——一个潜在的危险来源。第二组,出乎意料,是东正教。他们以反同化主义的意识形态而闻名,可能被认为是犹太民族主义的主要候选人。然而,他们激烈地反对它,因为他们认为犹太民族主义是对东正教精神的威胁,东正教精神建立在与其他犹太人在宗教教义和实践的基础上分离的概念上。1919年,斯洛伐克的一些著名拉比与布达佩斯的东正教中央办事处断绝了联系,他们成立了“斯洛伐克东正教会中央事务局”。(缺乏有组织的东正教的捷克社区被忽视了。)类似的举动发生在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From a People to a Church by the Grace of the State: Another View of Hungarian Jewish Orthodoxy
Following the disintegration of Austria--Hungary in 1918, hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews found themselves as residents of other states—mainly Romania and Czechoslovakia. In this new situation, the question of their national identity became open to debate. Their “Hungarianess” having been rendered all but irrelevant, the option of a Jewish national identity became increasingly attractive, strengthened by a zeitgeist in which the notion of national self-determination was leading to the creation of new states, and groups (like the Jews), unable to claim an independent territory, were gaining recognition as “national minorities.” By the same token, Jewish national aspirations found reinforcement through decisions being made by the great powers through the instrument of the League of Nations, which in 1920 granted to Britain an internationally backed mandate with the aim of establishing in Palestine a “national home for the Jewish people.” Among two groups of Jews in particular the collapse of Hungarian national identity created a deep crisis. The first group was the highly assimilated, whose decades-long effort to adopt the Hungarian language and culture and to become integrated into Hungarian society had been nullified at a single blow. For all practical purposes, their Magyar identification went from being an advantage to being a burden—and a potential source of danger. The second group, less to be expected, was the Orthodox. Known for their anti-assimilationist ideology, they might have been thought prime candidates for Jewish nationalism. Yet they fought fiercely against it because they regarded Jewish nationalism as a threat to the Orthodox ethos which was built on the concept of separation from other Jews on the basis of religious doctrine and practice. In 1919, now cut off from the Orthodox central office in Budapest, a number of prominent rabbis in Slovakia formed the “Central Bureau of Slovak Orthodox Congregations.” (The Czech communities, which lacked an organized Orthodoxy, were ignored.) A similar move took place in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MODERN JUDAISM
MODERN JUDAISM HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Modern Judaism: A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience provides a distinctive, interdisciplinary forum for discussion of the modern Jewish experience. Articles focus on topics pertinent to the understanding of Jewish life today and the forces that have shaped that experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信