重大事故后评估决策模式和风险接受行为:以美国宇航局和哥伦比亚号航天飞机事故为例

Q3 Social Sciences

Astropolitics Pub Date : 2017-05-04 DOI:10.1080/14777622.2017.1340070

David M. Lengyel, T. Mazzuchi, D. Deal

{"title":"重大事故后评估决策模式和风险接受行为:以美国宇航局和哥伦比亚号航天飞机事故为例","authors":"David M. Lengyel, T. Mazzuchi, D. Deal","doi":"10.1080/14777622.2017.1340070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The February 2003 loss of the space shuttle Columbia on mission STS-107 was a mishap that stunned both NASA and the world. This research examines the pre-NASA and post-NASA decision-making modalities and risk acceptance behavior for the safe and reliable operation of the space shuttle through the lens of hazard analysis. Interviews with NASA administrators and senior Space Shuttle Program managers bring back to life their views from the 2003 through 2005 timeframe, during which NASA returned the space shuttle back to a flight status. Lessons from their effort have broad applicability to other organizations recovering from—and attempting to prevent—a major accident.","PeriodicalId":35153,"journal":{"name":"Astropolitics","volume":"15 1","pages":"113 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Decision-Making Modalities and Risk Acceptance Behavior after a Major Mishap: The Case of NASA and the Space Shuttle Columbia Accident\",\"authors\":\"David M. Lengyel, T. Mazzuchi, D. Deal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14777622.2017.1340070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The February 2003 loss of the space shuttle Columbia on mission STS-107 was a mishap that stunned both NASA and the world. This research examines the pre-NASA and post-NASA decision-making modalities and risk acceptance behavior for the safe and reliable operation of the space shuttle through the lens of hazard analysis. Interviews with NASA administrators and senior Space Shuttle Program managers bring back to life their views from the 2003 through 2005 timeframe, during which NASA returned the space shuttle back to a flight status. Lessons from their effort have broad applicability to other organizations recovering from—and attempting to prevent—a major accident.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astropolitics\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astropolitics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2017.1340070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astropolitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2017.1340070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2003年2月，执行STS-107任务的哥伦比亚号航天飞机失事，这一事故震惊了美国宇航局和全世界。本研究通过危害分析的视角，考察了nasa之前和nasa之后航天飞机安全可靠运行的决策方式和风险接受行为。对美国宇航局管理人员和航天飞机项目高级管理人员的采访使他们从2003年到2005年的时间框架中重新回到了生活中，在此期间，美国宇航局将航天飞机恢复到飞行状态。从他们的努力中获得的经验教训对其他从重大事故中恢复和试图防止事故的组织具有广泛的适用性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluating Decision-Making Modalities and Risk Acceptance Behavior after a Major Mishap: The Case of NASA and the Space Shuttle Columbia Accident

ABSTRACT The February 2003 loss of the space shuttle Columbia on mission STS-107 was a mishap that stunned both NASA and the world. This research examines the pre-NASA and post-NASA decision-making modalities and risk acceptance behavior for the safe and reliable operation of the space shuttle through the lens of hazard analysis. Interviews with NASA administrators and senior Space Shuttle Program managers bring back to life their views from the 2003 through 2005 timeframe, during which NASA returned the space shuttle back to a flight status. Lessons from their effort have broad applicability to other organizations recovering from—and attempting to prevent—a major accident.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Astropolitics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics and Policy is a peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal is dedicated to policy relevant and interdisciplinary analysis of civil, commercial, military, and intelligence space activities. Committed to the highest editorial standards, Astropolitics is the international journal of choice for the academic, policy-maker and professional in the space community.