不是学习英语!缅甸语口语语篇特征的语料库分析

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Teanga Pub Date : 2019-08-27 DOI:10.35903/teanga.v21i0.175
San San Hnin Tun
{"title":"不是学习英语!缅甸语口语语篇特征的语料库分析","authors":"San San Hnin Tun","doi":"10.35903/teanga.v21i0.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is part of a larger research project on the ‘Comparative analysis of discourse markers in Burmese and in English’, and the product of my attempt to identify so-called particles in Burmese in terms of their discourse functions. Particles are bound morphemes, many of which do not have one-to-one equivalents in English. In traditional grammars, these lexical items are usually described in terms of their syntactic distribution: these studies present different kinds of sentential environments, but often fall short of a systematic generalization describing their semantic or pragmatic properties. A corpus-based study of spoken Burmese in different genres, within the framework of Discourse Analysis, suggests that particles often have prominent discourse functions, and many are in fact used primarily for their discourse functions in natural spoken discourse, in which propositional meaning remains the same with or without the particles.","PeriodicalId":36036,"journal":{"name":"Teanga","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not a study of English! A corpus analysis of discourse features in spoken Burmese\",\"authors\":\"San San Hnin Tun\",\"doi\":\"10.35903/teanga.v21i0.175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is part of a larger research project on the ‘Comparative analysis of discourse markers in Burmese and in English’, and the product of my attempt to identify so-called particles in Burmese in terms of their discourse functions. Particles are bound morphemes, many of which do not have one-to-one equivalents in English. In traditional grammars, these lexical items are usually described in terms of their syntactic distribution: these studies present different kinds of sentential environments, but often fall short of a systematic generalization describing their semantic or pragmatic properties. A corpus-based study of spoken Burmese in different genres, within the framework of Discourse Analysis, suggests that particles often have prominent discourse functions, and many are in fact used primarily for their discourse functions in natural spoken discourse, in which propositional meaning remains the same with or without the particles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teanga\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teanga\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35903/teanga.v21i0.175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teanga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35903/teanga.v21i0.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是“缅甸语和英语语篇标记语比较分析”这一大型研究项目的一部分,也是我试图根据语篇功能识别缅甸语中所谓的小词的成果。助词是结合语素,其中许多语素在英语中没有一对一的对等物。在传统的语法中,这些词汇项目通常是根据它们的句法分布来描述的,这些研究提出了不同类型的句子环境,但往往缺乏对它们的语义或语用特性的系统概括。在语篇分析的框架下,基于语料库的对不同体裁的缅甸语口语的研究表明,助词往往具有突出的语篇功能,而且许多助词实际上主要是在自然口语语篇中使用的,在自然口语语篇中,有助词或没有助词的命题意义是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Not a study of English! A corpus analysis of discourse features in spoken Burmese
This paper is part of a larger research project on the ‘Comparative analysis of discourse markers in Burmese and in English’, and the product of my attempt to identify so-called particles in Burmese in terms of their discourse functions. Particles are bound morphemes, many of which do not have one-to-one equivalents in English. In traditional grammars, these lexical items are usually described in terms of their syntactic distribution: these studies present different kinds of sentential environments, but often fall short of a systematic generalization describing their semantic or pragmatic properties. A corpus-based study of spoken Burmese in different genres, within the framework of Discourse Analysis, suggests that particles often have prominent discourse functions, and many are in fact used primarily for their discourse functions in natural spoken discourse, in which propositional meaning remains the same with or without the particles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teanga
Teanga Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信