{"title":"民间医学。医疗模式的文化局限性?","authors":"Ángel Martínez Hernáez, J. Comelles","doi":"10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the authors explore the 'political' usages of the folk-medicine concept. From a critical medical anthropology approach they analyze the emergent notion in Pitre's work, its later appropiation by the ethnomedicine, the medical anthropology critique and, finally, its new usage in the Italian and Mexican anthropology. As a final remark, they talk about the role of anthropology in the present-day health-care contexts and the different possibilities that this situation brings about in relation with the notion of folkmedicine .","PeriodicalId":30257,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares","volume":"78 1","pages":"109-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La medicina popular. ¿Los límites culturales del modelo médico?\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Martínez Hernáez, J. Comelles\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the authors explore the 'political' usages of the folk-medicine concept. From a critical medical anthropology approach they analyze the emergent notion in Pitre's work, its later appropiation by the ethnomedicine, the medical anthropology critique and, finally, its new usage in the Italian and Mexican anthropology. As a final remark, they talk about the role of anthropology in the present-day health-care contexts and the different possibilities that this situation brings about in relation with the notion of folkmedicine .\",\"PeriodicalId\":30257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"109-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
La medicina popular. ¿Los límites culturales del modelo médico?
In this paper the authors explore the 'political' usages of the folk-medicine concept. From a critical medical anthropology approach they analyze the emergent notion in Pitre's work, its later appropiation by the ethnomedicine, the medical anthropology critique and, finally, its new usage in the Italian and Mexican anthropology. As a final remark, they talk about the role of anthropology in the present-day health-care contexts and the different possibilities that this situation brings about in relation with the notion of folkmedicine .
期刊介绍:
Established in 1944, Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares is presently the longest standing Spanish Journal devoted to social and cultural anthropology, publishing scholarly work on human matters such as mentalities, religion, kinship, social relationships and representations, material culture, oral literature, dialectal lexicon and all other related subjects of anthropological research. Regular sections include major Articles, Notes, Archival Documents and Book Reviews. Aimed at a learned readership, it publishes original contributions to anthropological knowledge while enriching scholarly debate, especially on theoretical and methodological questions as well as on ethnographic fieldwork.