应对死亡焦虑和意识:纽约COVID-19患者的经历

V. Novakovic, James D. Henneberry, Vivek Jain, Juan E. Mezzich
{"title":"应对死亡焦虑和意识:纽约COVID-19患者的经历","authors":"V. Novakovic, James D. Henneberry, Vivek Jain, Juan E. Mezzich","doi":"10.5750/ijpcm.v11i1.1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The global challenge that the Covid-19 pandemic represented for humanity, included local experiences and encounters from which helpful lessons may be drawn. \nObjectives: The primary objective was to assess and document death anxiety and death awareness among hospitalized intensive care unit (ICU) patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a community-based teaching hospital. The secondary one was to reflect on mental health clinicians’ therapeutic styles and skills when caring for patients in critical care settings. \nMethods: A series of hospitalized ICU patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at the height of the pandemic in New York City were evaluated in this study. Patients’ psychological distress symptoms, death awareness, and death anxiety were measured using the Revised Death Anxiety Scale. Seventeen COVID-19 positive patients with various comorbidities who had been admitted to the ICU at Staten Island University Hospital were compared with seventeen COVID-19 negative patients with various comorbidities who had been seen and evaluated on the same ward over the same time period. The Revised Death Anxiety Scale (25 items) was used on all subjects by the deployed psychiatrists. The clinicians’ experiences as recorded through diaries during this time were examined and reflected on. \nResults: Out of seventeen COVID-19 positive patients who participated in this case series, eleven responded with heigh death anxiety scores as compared to the seventeen COVID-19 negative patients in which only three subjects were observed to have high scores. From the very beginning, the COVID-19 pandemic brought to the forefront massive challenges for both psychiatrists and patients. These challenges immediately affected rapport-building, often leading to an atmosphere of trust, but also exposing patients to additional distress. Prior to furthering and facilitating therapeutic dialogue, psychiatrists had to “anesthetize the therapeutic situation,” decrease the arousal level and be attentive throughout the encounter. This attentiveness had to be individually organized and modulated as patients displayed different personality styles, with variations in their internal world and severity of medical condition. In due course, individual patterns of reactions were observed such as fantasies concerning isolation and separation, contrasting attachment styles, need for punishment and guilt feelings and activation of panic and helplessness. The latter was particularly challenging as both patient and physician could become easily trapped in feeling helpless and confused, with strong interpersonal and relational overlays. Compassionate gestures and sensibility in connectedness conveyed vitality and much needed hope. \nDiscussion and Conclusions: Although death anxiety and death awareness seemed overwhelmingly prevalent among the COVID-19 positive patients in comparison to COVID-19 negative patients, differences have been observed in terms of being age-specific, having multiple comorbidities compounding on COVID-19 positive status (e.g., obesity and COPD). In general, the acute psychological distress of patients improved with medical treatment and when stabilized they were moved out of the ICU. Patients with high scores who had a COVID-19 positive status tended to have increased stay in the ICU. Future studies should assess the long-term consequences of COVID-19 on patients’ general mental health and particularly death awareness and death anxiety. Additionally, health systems may use similar studies to understand the labor and costs borne by mental health clinicians as well as other clinicians working in such settings. In terms of medical education and liaison work, such research may inform training of clinicians in internal medicine, critical care, and mental health.","PeriodicalId":89680,"journal":{"name":"International journal of person centered medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COPING WITH DEATH ANXIETY AND AWARENESS: EXPERIENCE WITH COVID-19 PATIENTS IN NEW YORK\",\"authors\":\"V. Novakovic, James D. Henneberry, Vivek Jain, Juan E. Mezzich\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/ijpcm.v11i1.1075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The global challenge that the Covid-19 pandemic represented for humanity, included local experiences and encounters from which helpful lessons may be drawn. \\nObjectives: The primary objective was to assess and document death anxiety and death awareness among hospitalized intensive care unit (ICU) patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a community-based teaching hospital. The secondary one was to reflect on mental health clinicians’ therapeutic styles and skills when caring for patients in critical care settings. \\nMethods: A series of hospitalized ICU patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at the height of the pandemic in New York City were evaluated in this study. Patients’ psychological distress symptoms, death awareness, and death anxiety were measured using the Revised Death Anxiety Scale. Seventeen COVID-19 positive patients with various comorbidities who had been admitted to the ICU at Staten Island University Hospital were compared with seventeen COVID-19 negative patients with various comorbidities who had been seen and evaluated on the same ward over the same time period. The Revised Death Anxiety Scale (25 items) was used on all subjects by the deployed psychiatrists. The clinicians’ experiences as recorded through diaries during this time were examined and reflected on. \\nResults: Out of seventeen COVID-19 positive patients who participated in this case series, eleven responded with heigh death anxiety scores as compared to the seventeen COVID-19 negative patients in which only three subjects were observed to have high scores. From the very beginning, the COVID-19 pandemic brought to the forefront massive challenges for both psychiatrists and patients. These challenges immediately affected rapport-building, often leading to an atmosphere of trust, but also exposing patients to additional distress. Prior to furthering and facilitating therapeutic dialogue, psychiatrists had to “anesthetize the therapeutic situation,” decrease the arousal level and be attentive throughout the encounter. This attentiveness had to be individually organized and modulated as patients displayed different personality styles, with variations in their internal world and severity of medical condition. In due course, individual patterns of reactions were observed such as fantasies concerning isolation and separation, contrasting attachment styles, need for punishment and guilt feelings and activation of panic and helplessness. The latter was particularly challenging as both patient and physician could become easily trapped in feeling helpless and confused, with strong interpersonal and relational overlays. Compassionate gestures and sensibility in connectedness conveyed vitality and much needed hope. \\nDiscussion and Conclusions: Although death anxiety and death awareness seemed overwhelmingly prevalent among the COVID-19 positive patients in comparison to COVID-19 negative patients, differences have been observed in terms of being age-specific, having multiple comorbidities compounding on COVID-19 positive status (e.g., obesity and COPD). In general, the acute psychological distress of patients improved with medical treatment and when stabilized they were moved out of the ICU. Patients with high scores who had a COVID-19 positive status tended to have increased stay in the ICU. Future studies should assess the long-term consequences of COVID-19 on patients’ general mental health and particularly death awareness and death anxiety. Additionally, health systems may use similar studies to understand the labor and costs borne by mental health clinicians as well as other clinicians working in such settings. In terms of medical education and liaison work, such research may inform training of clinicians in internal medicine, critical care, and mental health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of person centered medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of person centered medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v11i1.1075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of person centered medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v11i1.1075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:2019冠状病毒病大流行对人类构成的全球挑战包括当地的经验和遭遇,可以从中吸取有益的教训。目的:主要目的是评估和记录某社区教学医院重症监护病房(ICU)确诊COVID-19住院患者的死亡焦虑和死亡意识。第二个是反映心理健康临床医生的治疗风格和技能,当照顾病人在重症监护环境。方法:本研究对大流行高峰期间纽约市住院的一系列COVID-19 ICU患者进行评估。采用修订后的死亡焦虑量表测量患者的心理困扰症状、死亡意识和死亡焦虑。将斯坦顿岛大学医院重症监护室收治的17例COVID-19阳性合并各种合并症患者与同期在同一病房就诊并评估的17例COVID-19阴性合并各种合并症患者进行比较。所有被派精神科医生使用修订的死亡焦虑量表(25项)。在此期间,通过日记记录的临床医生的经历进行了检查和反思。结果:在参与本病例系列的17例COVID-19阳性患者中,11例患者的死亡焦虑得分较高,而17例COVID-19阴性患者中只有3例患者的死亡焦虑得分较高。从一开始,COVID-19大流行就给精神科医生和患者带来了巨大的挑战。这些挑战立即影响了融洽关系的建立,往往导致信任的气氛,但也使患者面临额外的痛苦。在进一步推进和促进治疗对话之前,精神科医生必须“麻醉治疗情境”,降低唤醒水平,并在整个过程中保持专注。当病人表现出不同的个性风格、他们的内心世界和医疗状况的严重程度不同时,这种关注必须单独组织和调节。在适当的时候,观察到个体的反应模式,比如关于孤立和分离的幻想,对比的依恋风格,对惩罚和内疚的需求,以及恐慌和无助的激活。后者尤其具有挑战性,因为病人和医生都很容易陷入无助和困惑的感觉中,并且有很强的人际关系重叠。富有同情心的姿态和情感传达了活力和迫切需要的希望。讨论与结论:尽管与COVID-19阴性患者相比,COVID-19阳性患者似乎普遍存在死亡焦虑和死亡意识,但在年龄特异性、COVID-19阳性患者存在多种合并症(如肥胖和COPD)方面存在差异。总的来说,患者的急性心理困扰在治疗后得到改善,病情稳定后,他们被移出ICU。得分高且COVID-19阳性的患者在ICU的住院时间往往更长。未来的研究应评估COVID-19对患者一般心理健康,特别是死亡意识和死亡焦虑的长期影响。此外,卫生系统可以使用类似的研究来了解精神卫生临床医生以及在此类环境中工作的其他临床医生所承担的劳动力和成本。在医学教育和联络工作方面,这些研究可以为内科、重症监护和精神卫生方面的临床医生培训提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COPING WITH DEATH ANXIETY AND AWARENESS: EXPERIENCE WITH COVID-19 PATIENTS IN NEW YORK
Introduction: The global challenge that the Covid-19 pandemic represented for humanity, included local experiences and encounters from which helpful lessons may be drawn. Objectives: The primary objective was to assess and document death anxiety and death awareness among hospitalized intensive care unit (ICU) patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a community-based teaching hospital. The secondary one was to reflect on mental health clinicians’ therapeutic styles and skills when caring for patients in critical care settings. Methods: A series of hospitalized ICU patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at the height of the pandemic in New York City were evaluated in this study. Patients’ psychological distress symptoms, death awareness, and death anxiety were measured using the Revised Death Anxiety Scale. Seventeen COVID-19 positive patients with various comorbidities who had been admitted to the ICU at Staten Island University Hospital were compared with seventeen COVID-19 negative patients with various comorbidities who had been seen and evaluated on the same ward over the same time period. The Revised Death Anxiety Scale (25 items) was used on all subjects by the deployed psychiatrists. The clinicians’ experiences as recorded through diaries during this time were examined and reflected on. Results: Out of seventeen COVID-19 positive patients who participated in this case series, eleven responded with heigh death anxiety scores as compared to the seventeen COVID-19 negative patients in which only three subjects were observed to have high scores. From the very beginning, the COVID-19 pandemic brought to the forefront massive challenges for both psychiatrists and patients. These challenges immediately affected rapport-building, often leading to an atmosphere of trust, but also exposing patients to additional distress. Prior to furthering and facilitating therapeutic dialogue, psychiatrists had to “anesthetize the therapeutic situation,” decrease the arousal level and be attentive throughout the encounter. This attentiveness had to be individually organized and modulated as patients displayed different personality styles, with variations in their internal world and severity of medical condition. In due course, individual patterns of reactions were observed such as fantasies concerning isolation and separation, contrasting attachment styles, need for punishment and guilt feelings and activation of panic and helplessness. The latter was particularly challenging as both patient and physician could become easily trapped in feeling helpless and confused, with strong interpersonal and relational overlays. Compassionate gestures and sensibility in connectedness conveyed vitality and much needed hope. Discussion and Conclusions: Although death anxiety and death awareness seemed overwhelmingly prevalent among the COVID-19 positive patients in comparison to COVID-19 negative patients, differences have been observed in terms of being age-specific, having multiple comorbidities compounding on COVID-19 positive status (e.g., obesity and COPD). In general, the acute psychological distress of patients improved with medical treatment and when stabilized they were moved out of the ICU. Patients with high scores who had a COVID-19 positive status tended to have increased stay in the ICU. Future studies should assess the long-term consequences of COVID-19 on patients’ general mental health and particularly death awareness and death anxiety. Additionally, health systems may use similar studies to understand the labor and costs borne by mental health clinicians as well as other clinicians working in such settings. In terms of medical education and liaison work, such research may inform training of clinicians in internal medicine, critical care, and mental health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信