应用四层法预测钻前、钻中孔隙压力

S. Shaker
{"title":"应用四层法预测钻前、钻中孔隙压力","authors":"S. Shaker","doi":"10.4043/29517-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This method integrates the geological building blocks of sedimentation, dehydration to lithification and the formation water hydrodynamic forces associated with each of these phases. The current known conventional velocity – pore pressure transformation models are lacking this relationship.\n In the current widely used conventional methods, it is controversial to consider the shallow section as normally pressured and at the same time extract a compaction trend from its petrophysical properties. Moreover, there is confusion about which part of the subsurface section the Effective Stress theorem should be applied to. The novelty of dividing the subsurface into four zones using this new approach reduces the risk of predicting the pore pressure before drilling and the uncertainty of its correct calibration during drilling.\n This new pore pressure calculation is done separately in each zone based on the predominant formation-water dynamic. Normal hydrostatic pressure is only assigned to the loosely compacted very shallow section (A). Hydrodynamic zone B with upward formation water flow is associated with compaction and reduction of porosity due to sediments load. Petrophysical trends such as velocity, density, resistivity follows a compaction trend in this zone. As result of depositing shale seal in zone C, due to high stand sea level, fluid is prevented from permeating upward. This low permeable top seal is referred to as top of geopressure (TOG). The geopressured section of zone D below the pressure ramp in zone C follows a cascade outline where the pressure in permeable beds show linear trends and shale exhibits an exponential trend.\n The petrophysical properties of the deeper shale beds below the top seal represent several passive compaction trends. Pore pressure prediction in the deep geopressured section D is derived from calculating at the same depth the disparity between the extrapolated velocity compaction trend (CT) values and the measured ones. A unique mathematical calculation is introduced here to establish the compaction trend (CT) instead of the manual graphically extrapolated so called NCT. Before drilling seismic velocity, semblance is a key for defining the four zones. Velocity – pore-pressure transformation modeling is an important aspect of the drilling cost for a proposed location. Moreover, LWD’s during drilling and conventional logs post drilling are the fine-tuning tools of calibrating the pre-drilling seismic-pressure model. The calibrated model is the backbone of any predicted pore pressure in future drilling locations in the same basin.\n The pore pressure prediction applying this method facilitates assigning the casing setting and mud programs at the appropriate depths before drilling. Furthermore, it reduces the non-productive time (NPT) and challenges by assessing the subsurface formation pressure including the shallow water flow (SWF), risk of kicks and loss of circulation along the proposed bore-hole trajectory before moving rig on location.","PeriodicalId":11149,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pore Pressure Prediction Before and During Drilling Applying the Four Zones Method\",\"authors\":\"S. Shaker\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/29517-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This method integrates the geological building blocks of sedimentation, dehydration to lithification and the formation water hydrodynamic forces associated with each of these phases. The current known conventional velocity – pore pressure transformation models are lacking this relationship.\\n In the current widely used conventional methods, it is controversial to consider the shallow section as normally pressured and at the same time extract a compaction trend from its petrophysical properties. Moreover, there is confusion about which part of the subsurface section the Effective Stress theorem should be applied to. The novelty of dividing the subsurface into four zones using this new approach reduces the risk of predicting the pore pressure before drilling and the uncertainty of its correct calibration during drilling.\\n This new pore pressure calculation is done separately in each zone based on the predominant formation-water dynamic. Normal hydrostatic pressure is only assigned to the loosely compacted very shallow section (A). Hydrodynamic zone B with upward formation water flow is associated with compaction and reduction of porosity due to sediments load. Petrophysical trends such as velocity, density, resistivity follows a compaction trend in this zone. As result of depositing shale seal in zone C, due to high stand sea level, fluid is prevented from permeating upward. This low permeable top seal is referred to as top of geopressure (TOG). The geopressured section of zone D below the pressure ramp in zone C follows a cascade outline where the pressure in permeable beds show linear trends and shale exhibits an exponential trend.\\n The petrophysical properties of the deeper shale beds below the top seal represent several passive compaction trends. Pore pressure prediction in the deep geopressured section D is derived from calculating at the same depth the disparity between the extrapolated velocity compaction trend (CT) values and the measured ones. A unique mathematical calculation is introduced here to establish the compaction trend (CT) instead of the manual graphically extrapolated so called NCT. Before drilling seismic velocity, semblance is a key for defining the four zones. Velocity – pore-pressure transformation modeling is an important aspect of the drilling cost for a proposed location. Moreover, LWD’s during drilling and conventional logs post drilling are the fine-tuning tools of calibrating the pre-drilling seismic-pressure model. The calibrated model is the backbone of any predicted pore pressure in future drilling locations in the same basin.\\n The pore pressure prediction applying this method facilitates assigning the casing setting and mud programs at the appropriate depths before drilling. Furthermore, it reduces the non-productive time (NPT) and challenges by assessing the subsurface formation pressure including the shallow water flow (SWF), risk of kicks and loss of circulation along the proposed bore-hole trajectory before moving rig on location.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/29517-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29517-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该方法综合了沉积、脱水到岩化的地质组成部分,以及与这些阶段相关的地层水动力。目前已知的常规速度-孔隙压力转换模型缺乏这种关系。在目前广泛使用的常规方法中,将浅层段视为正常压力,同时从其岩石物性中提取压实趋势存在争议。此外,对于有效应力定理应应用于地下剖面的哪一部分也存在混淆。使用这种新方法将地下划分为四个区域的新颖之处降低了钻井前预测孔隙压力的风险以及钻井过程中正确校准孔隙压力的不确定性。这种新的孔隙压力计算方法是根据主要的地层-水动力学在每个层分别进行的。正常的静水压力只分配给松散压实的非常浅的剖面(A)。具有向上地层水流的水动力带B与沉积物负荷导致的压实和孔隙度降低有关。岩石物性趋势,如速度、密度、电阻率,遵循压实趋势。由于C带沉积了页岩封层,由于海平面较高,流体无法向上渗透。这种低渗透性的顶部密封被称为顶压力(TOG)。C区压力坡道以下的D区高压段呈梯级状,其中渗透层压力呈线性趋势,页岩压力呈指数趋势。顶封以下深层页岩层的岩石物性表现出几种被动压实趋势。深部高压D段孔隙压力预测是通过计算相同深度下外推速度压实趋势值与实测值的差值得出的。这里介绍了一种独特的数学计算来建立压实趋势(CT),而不是手工图形外推的所谓NCT。在钻探地震速度之前,相似度是确定四个带的关键。速度-孔隙压力转换建模是估算拟建位置钻井成本的一个重要方面。此外,钻中随钻测井和钻后常规测井是标定钻前地震压力模型的微调工具。校准后的模型是预测同一盆地未来钻井位置孔隙压力的基础。应用该方法进行的孔隙压力预测有助于在钻井前在适当的深度指定套管和泥浆方案。此外,在钻机就位之前,通过评估地下地层压力,包括浅水流量(SWF)、井涌风险和井眼循环损失,可以减少非生产时间(NPT)和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pore Pressure Prediction Before and During Drilling Applying the Four Zones Method
This method integrates the geological building blocks of sedimentation, dehydration to lithification and the formation water hydrodynamic forces associated with each of these phases. The current known conventional velocity – pore pressure transformation models are lacking this relationship. In the current widely used conventional methods, it is controversial to consider the shallow section as normally pressured and at the same time extract a compaction trend from its petrophysical properties. Moreover, there is confusion about which part of the subsurface section the Effective Stress theorem should be applied to. The novelty of dividing the subsurface into four zones using this new approach reduces the risk of predicting the pore pressure before drilling and the uncertainty of its correct calibration during drilling. This new pore pressure calculation is done separately in each zone based on the predominant formation-water dynamic. Normal hydrostatic pressure is only assigned to the loosely compacted very shallow section (A). Hydrodynamic zone B with upward formation water flow is associated with compaction and reduction of porosity due to sediments load. Petrophysical trends such as velocity, density, resistivity follows a compaction trend in this zone. As result of depositing shale seal in zone C, due to high stand sea level, fluid is prevented from permeating upward. This low permeable top seal is referred to as top of geopressure (TOG). The geopressured section of zone D below the pressure ramp in zone C follows a cascade outline where the pressure in permeable beds show linear trends and shale exhibits an exponential trend. The petrophysical properties of the deeper shale beds below the top seal represent several passive compaction trends. Pore pressure prediction in the deep geopressured section D is derived from calculating at the same depth the disparity between the extrapolated velocity compaction trend (CT) values and the measured ones. A unique mathematical calculation is introduced here to establish the compaction trend (CT) instead of the manual graphically extrapolated so called NCT. Before drilling seismic velocity, semblance is a key for defining the four zones. Velocity – pore-pressure transformation modeling is an important aspect of the drilling cost for a proposed location. Moreover, LWD’s during drilling and conventional logs post drilling are the fine-tuning tools of calibrating the pre-drilling seismic-pressure model. The calibrated model is the backbone of any predicted pore pressure in future drilling locations in the same basin. The pore pressure prediction applying this method facilitates assigning the casing setting and mud programs at the appropriate depths before drilling. Furthermore, it reduces the non-productive time (NPT) and challenges by assessing the subsurface formation pressure including the shallow water flow (SWF), risk of kicks and loss of circulation along the proposed bore-hole trajectory before moving rig on location.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信