消除合同文件与环境影响评估的冲突:以美国退伍军人事务部为例

Q3 Social Sciences

Environmental Practice Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S1466046616000478

T. King

{"title":"消除合同文件与环境影响评估的冲突:以美国退伍军人事务部为例","authors":"T. King","doi":"10.1017/S1466046616000478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Government agencies, environmental consultants, and the public alike are frustrated by poor the coordination between agency planning and environmental impact assessment (EIA). Contracts for project design, construction, and management too often fail to provide for EIA, or to accommodate its results. A systematic review of standard contract documents and guidelines used by one major U.S. government agency revealed that they seldom took into account the need for EIA or provided for integrating the results of EIA into planning. Correcting these deficiencies was not very difficult. Other agencies may be well advised to undertake similar reviews.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"22 1","pages":"270 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eliminating Contract Document Conflicts with Environmental Impact Assessment: An Example from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs\",\"authors\":\"T. King\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1466046616000478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Government agencies, environmental consultants, and the public alike are frustrated by poor the coordination between agency planning and environmental impact assessment (EIA). Contracts for project design, construction, and management too often fail to provide for EIA, or to accommodate its results. A systematic review of standard contract documents and guidelines used by one major U.S. government agency revealed that they seldom took into account the need for EIA or provided for integrating the results of EIA into planning. Correcting these deficiencies was not very difficult. Other agencies may be well advised to undertake similar reviews.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"270 - 273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046616000478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046616000478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

政府机构、环境顾问和公众都对机构规划与环境影响评价之间的协调不力感到沮丧。项目设计、建设和管理合同往往不能提供环境影响评估，或者不能适应环境影响评估的结果。对美国一家主要政府机构使用的标准合同文件和指导方针进行系统审查后发现，它们很少考虑环评的必要性，也很少将环评结果纳入规划。纠正这些缺陷并不十分困难。其他机构最好也进行类似的审查。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Eliminating Contract Document Conflicts with Environmental Impact Assessment: An Example from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Government agencies, environmental consultants, and the public alike are frustrated by poor the coordination between agency planning and environmental impact assessment (EIA). Contracts for project design, construction, and management too often fail to provide for EIA, or to accommodate its results. A systematic review of standard contract documents and guidelines used by one major U.S. government agency revealed that they seldom took into account the need for EIA or provided for integrating the results of EIA into planning. Correcting these deficiencies was not very difficult. Other agencies may be well advised to undertake similar reviews.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Environmental Practice ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals