PG102麻醉实习生在冠状病毒大流行期间的学习机会

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
S. Corbett, C. Burlacu
{"title":"PG102麻醉实习生在冠状病毒大流行期间的学习机会","authors":"S. Corbett, C. Burlacu","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction This survey aimed to Establish the extent to which trainees feel the pandemic to date has disrupted their training. Identify what training and research opportunities have been available to trainees Identify if and how teaching has continued in anaesthesiology departments Methods A link to an online survey was sent out to anaesthetic trainees in the Republic of Ireland. 64 responses were received from a range of sites (Dublin based 59%) and with a range of experience. (SHO-42%, Registrar- 58%). This represented a 19% response rate among those enrolled in Specialist Anaesthesiology Training (SAT). Results 85% of respondents felt that they lost out on important training opportunities because of the pandemic, with 28% strongly agreeing. These opportunities included anaesthesiology exams (30%), other exams (17%), attending meetings (65%), presenting at meetings (33%), research (17%), attending mandatory courses (43%), and recommended courses (28%). 75% felt that they had the opportunity to take part in other training opportunities, with 37.5% somewhat agreeing that this was the case. These included participating in simulation (44%), designing and implementing simulation (21%), taking on mentorship roles (25%), protocol and guideline design (25%), and clinical research (19%). 58% of simulation training was in donning and doffing PPE, 50% was in airway management in ICU and 23% was in cardiac arrest management. The most helpful factors that trainees felt helped them in pursuing training were their relationships with consultants (79%), and other trainees (80%). 84% respondents said that the amount of teaching in their departments decreased during the pandemic, and that where it did departmental teaching took place via videoconferencing (70%), as did ICU teaching (30%), and simulation (33%). Discussion While negative effects of the pandemic on training opportunites is clear,1 2 trainees also felt they had training opportunities that they would not otherwise have. This is important because of the significant pressure we know that trainees feel to pursue non clinical activities.3 It is noteworthy that 44% respondents had access to on site simulation training. The importance of mentorship and relationships with colleagues and both consultant and trainee level is also clear. References Rose S. Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2131. Daodu O. COVID-19 – Considerations and Implications for Surgical Learners. Ann Surg 2020 Jul;272(1):e22–3. Introduction to CAT & CAI Training & Wellness Survey [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 28]. Available from: https://dv4.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/264cae73b65742ad89b49577b79603a51d","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PG102 Anaesthesiology trainee learning opportunities during the coronavirus pandemic\",\"authors\":\"S. Corbett, C. Burlacu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction This survey aimed to Establish the extent to which trainees feel the pandemic to date has disrupted their training. Identify what training and research opportunities have been available to trainees Identify if and how teaching has continued in anaesthesiology departments Methods A link to an online survey was sent out to anaesthetic trainees in the Republic of Ireland. 64 responses were received from a range of sites (Dublin based 59%) and with a range of experience. (SHO-42%, Registrar- 58%). This represented a 19% response rate among those enrolled in Specialist Anaesthesiology Training (SAT). Results 85% of respondents felt that they lost out on important training opportunities because of the pandemic, with 28% strongly agreeing. These opportunities included anaesthesiology exams (30%), other exams (17%), attending meetings (65%), presenting at meetings (33%), research (17%), attending mandatory courses (43%), and recommended courses (28%). 75% felt that they had the opportunity to take part in other training opportunities, with 37.5% somewhat agreeing that this was the case. These included participating in simulation (44%), designing and implementing simulation (21%), taking on mentorship roles (25%), protocol and guideline design (25%), and clinical research (19%). 58% of simulation training was in donning and doffing PPE, 50% was in airway management in ICU and 23% was in cardiac arrest management. The most helpful factors that trainees felt helped them in pursuing training were their relationships with consultants (79%), and other trainees (80%). 84% respondents said that the amount of teaching in their departments decreased during the pandemic, and that where it did departmental teaching took place via videoconferencing (70%), as did ICU teaching (30%), and simulation (33%). Discussion While negative effects of the pandemic on training opportunites is clear,1 2 trainees also felt they had training opportunities that they would not otherwise have. This is important because of the significant pressure we know that trainees feel to pursue non clinical activities.3 It is noteworthy that 44% respondents had access to on site simulation training. The importance of mentorship and relationships with colleagues and both consultant and trainee level is also clear. References Rose S. Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2131. Daodu O. COVID-19 – Considerations and Implications for Surgical Learners. Ann Surg 2020 Jul;272(1):e22–3. Introduction to CAT & CAI Training & Wellness Survey [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 28]. Available from: https://dv4.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/264cae73b65742ad89b49577b79603a51d\",\"PeriodicalId\":44757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项调查的目的是确定受训者认为迄今为止大流行对其培训的影响程度。确定培训生获得了哪些培训和研究机会确定麻醉科的教学是否以及如何继续方法向爱尔兰共和国的麻醉科培训生发送了一项在线调查的链接。从一系列地点收到64份回复(都柏林59%),并具有一系列经验。(SHO-42%, Registrar- 58%)。在参加专科麻醉学培训(SAT)的参与者中,这一比例为19%。结果85%的受访者认为,由于大流行,他们失去了重要的培训机会,28%的受访者表示强烈同意。这些机会包括麻醉学考试(30%)、其他考试(17%)、参加会议(65%)、在会议上发言(33%)、研究(17%)、参加必修课(43%)和推荐课程(28%)。75%的人认为他们有机会参加其他培训机会,37.5%的人多少同意这种情况。这些包括参与模拟(44%),设计和实施模拟(21%),担任指导角色(25%),方案和指南设计(25%)以及临床研究(19%)。58%的模拟训练为穿戴和脱下防护用品,50%为ICU气道管理,23%为心脏骤停管理。受训者认为对他们进行培训最有帮助的因素是他们与顾问(79%)和其他受训者(80%)的关系。84%的受访者表示,在疫情期间,其院系的教学数量减少了,在院系教学中,通过视频会议(70%)、ICU教学(30%)和模拟(33%)进行教学。讨论虽然大流行病对培训机会的负面影响是显而易见的,但12名受训者也认为,他们获得了本来不会有的培训机会。这一点很重要,因为我们知道受训者感到从事非临床活动的巨大压力值得注意的是,44%的受访者接受过现场模拟培训。导师和同事之间的关系以及顾问和培训生之间的关系的重要性也很明显。新冠肺炎时代的医学生教育。中国医学杂志2020年6月2日;323(21):2131。dao O. COVID-19 -对外科学习者的考虑和影响。中国生物医学工程学报,2016;31(1):391 - 391。CAT & CAI培训与健康调查简介[互联网]。[引自2020年6月28日]。可从:https://dv4.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/264cae73b65742ad89b49577b79603a51d获得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PG102 Anaesthesiology trainee learning opportunities during the coronavirus pandemic
Introduction This survey aimed to Establish the extent to which trainees feel the pandemic to date has disrupted their training. Identify what training and research opportunities have been available to trainees Identify if and how teaching has continued in anaesthesiology departments Methods A link to an online survey was sent out to anaesthetic trainees in the Republic of Ireland. 64 responses were received from a range of sites (Dublin based 59%) and with a range of experience. (SHO-42%, Registrar- 58%). This represented a 19% response rate among those enrolled in Specialist Anaesthesiology Training (SAT). Results 85% of respondents felt that they lost out on important training opportunities because of the pandemic, with 28% strongly agreeing. These opportunities included anaesthesiology exams (30%), other exams (17%), attending meetings (65%), presenting at meetings (33%), research (17%), attending mandatory courses (43%), and recommended courses (28%). 75% felt that they had the opportunity to take part in other training opportunities, with 37.5% somewhat agreeing that this was the case. These included participating in simulation (44%), designing and implementing simulation (21%), taking on mentorship roles (25%), protocol and guideline design (25%), and clinical research (19%). 58% of simulation training was in donning and doffing PPE, 50% was in airway management in ICU and 23% was in cardiac arrest management. The most helpful factors that trainees felt helped them in pursuing training were their relationships with consultants (79%), and other trainees (80%). 84% respondents said that the amount of teaching in their departments decreased during the pandemic, and that where it did departmental teaching took place via videoconferencing (70%), as did ICU teaching (30%), and simulation (33%). Discussion While negative effects of the pandemic on training opportunites is clear,1 2 trainees also felt they had training opportunities that they would not otherwise have. This is important because of the significant pressure we know that trainees feel to pursue non clinical activities.3 It is noteworthy that 44% respondents had access to on site simulation training. The importance of mentorship and relationships with colleagues and both consultant and trainee level is also clear. References Rose S. Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2131. Daodu O. COVID-19 – Considerations and Implications for Surgical Learners. Ann Surg 2020 Jul;272(1):e22–3. Introduction to CAT & CAI Training & Wellness Survey [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 28]. Available from: https://dv4.mediasite.com/mediasite/Play/264cae73b65742ad89b49577b79603a51d
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信