补充脱氢表雄酮能改善体外受精卵巢储备正常患者的生殖结局吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析

Maria Antonia Perelló , José Antonio Moreno , Miriam Crespo , Juan José Espinós , Miguel Ángel Checa
{"title":"补充脱氢表雄酮能改善体外受精卵巢储备正常患者的生殖结局吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Maria Antonia Perelló ,&nbsp;José Antonio Moreno ,&nbsp;Miriam Crespo ,&nbsp;Juan José Espinós ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Checa","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2022.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this systematic review<span><span> and meta-analysis is to study the efficacy of Dehydroepiandrosterone </span>in patients<span> with normal ovarian reserve<span> undergoing in vitro fertilization<span> treatment.</span></span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Centers for reproductive care.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Patients with normal ovarian reserve (NOR) undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and previously supplemented or not with DHEA.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to March 2021. Randomized controlled trials studying the effect of DHEA supplementation on reproductive outcomes in patients with normal ovarian reserve were included.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The outcomes of interest were miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate per embryo transfer.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DHEA supplementation, compared with placebo or no treatment, was associated with a significant decrease in miscarriage rate (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10–0.93; p = 0.04) in DHEA group. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in live birth rate (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.8–2.89; p = 0.2) or clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.73–1.95; p = 0.47) per embryo transfer. There were also no statistically significant differences in the number of oocytes (MD = 0.66 95% CI: - 0.04–1.36; p = 0.07) or metaphase II oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.32 95% CI: −<!--> <!-->0.12–0.76; p = 0.16) in one IVF cycle between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study suggested that DHEA supplementation could improve the miscarriage rate in NOR patients who underwent IVF treatment. However, no increase in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate or number of oocytes retrieved per IVF cycle could be demonstrated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation improve reproductive outcomes in patients with normal ovarian reserve undergoing in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Maria Antonia Perelló ,&nbsp;José Antonio Moreno ,&nbsp;Miriam Crespo ,&nbsp;Juan José Espinós ,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Checa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medre.2022.100120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this systematic review<span><span> and meta-analysis is to study the efficacy of Dehydroepiandrosterone </span>in patients<span> with normal ovarian reserve<span> undergoing in vitro fertilization<span> treatment.</span></span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Centers for reproductive care.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Patients with normal ovarian reserve (NOR) undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and previously supplemented or not with DHEA.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to March 2021. Randomized controlled trials studying the effect of DHEA supplementation on reproductive outcomes in patients with normal ovarian reserve were included.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The outcomes of interest were miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate per embryo transfer.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DHEA supplementation, compared with placebo or no treatment, was associated with a significant decrease in miscarriage rate (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10–0.93; p = 0.04) in DHEA group. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in live birth rate (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.8–2.89; p = 0.2) or clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.73–1.95; p = 0.47) per embryo transfer. There were also no statistically significant differences in the number of oocytes (MD = 0.66 95% CI: - 0.04–1.36; p = 0.07) or metaphase II oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.32 95% CI: −<!--> <!-->0.12–0.76; p = 0.16) in one IVF cycle between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study suggested that DHEA supplementation could improve the miscarriage rate in NOR patients who underwent IVF treatment. However, no increase in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate or number of oocytes retrieved per IVF cycle could be demonstrated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932022000081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932022000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究脱氢表雄酮在卵巢储备正常患者体外受精治疗中的疗效。设计系统回顾和荟萃分析。设置生殖保健中心。接受体外受精治疗的正常卵巢储备(NOR)患者,既往补充或未补充脱氢表雄酮。介入对Pubmed、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science进行了全面的电子文献检索,检索截止到2021年3月。纳入了研究DHEA补充对卵巢储备正常患者生殖结局影响的随机对照试验。主要观察指标为流产率、临床妊娠率和每次胚胎移植活产率。结果与安慰剂或未治疗相比,补充脱氢表雄酮与流产率显著降低相关(or = 0.30,95% CI: 0.10-0.93;p = 0.04)。相比之下,两组的活产率差异无统计学意义(OR = 1.52,95% CI: 0.8-2.89;p = 0.2)或临床妊娠率(or = 1.19,95% CI: 0.73-1.95;P = 0.47)。两组的卵母细胞数差异无统计学意义(MD = 0.66 95% CI: - 0.04-1.36;p = 0.07)或中期II卵母细胞恢复(MD = 0.32 95% CI:−0.12-0.76;p = 0.16)。结论本研究提示补充脱氢表雄酮可提高接受IVF治疗的NOR患者的流产率。然而,临床妊娠率、活产率或每个IVF周期取出的卵母细胞数量均未增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation improve reproductive outcomes in patients with normal ovarian reserve undergoing in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to study the efficacy of Dehydroepiandrosterone in patients with normal ovarian reserve undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting

Centers for reproductive care.

Patients

Patients with normal ovarian reserve (NOR) undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and previously supplemented or not with DHEA.

Intervention

A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to March 2021. Randomized controlled trials studying the effect of DHEA supplementation on reproductive outcomes in patients with normal ovarian reserve were included.

Main outcome measures

The outcomes of interest were miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate per embryo transfer.

Results

DHEA supplementation, compared with placebo or no treatment, was associated with a significant decrease in miscarriage rate (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10–0.93; p = 0.04) in DHEA group. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences in live birth rate (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.8–2.89; p = 0.2) or clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.73–1.95; p = 0.47) per embryo transfer. There were also no statistically significant differences in the number of oocytes (MD = 0.66 95% CI: - 0.04–1.36; p = 0.07) or metaphase II oocytes retrieved (MD = 0.32 95% CI: − 0.12–0.76; p = 0.16) in one IVF cycle between the two groups.

Conclusions

Our study suggested that DHEA supplementation could improve the miscarriage rate in NOR patients who underwent IVF treatment. However, no increase in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate or number of oocytes retrieved per IVF cycle could be demonstrated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信