{"title":"主题议题:跨学科的信仰与学习","authors":"Calvin G. Roso, Paul Kaak, M. LaPorte","doi":"10.1080/15363759.2021.2004263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to this theme issue of the Christian Higher Education journal! This collection of studies was developed within the investigative framework known as the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL; Bernstein, 2018; Miller-Young & Yeo, 2015). The researchers who contributed articles to this theme issue of the Christian Higher Education journal were involved in a multi-year collaborative project with the goal of better understanding the pedagogical relationship of service-learning infused with academic faith integration as experienced by students in a Christian university setting. In conducting research projects related to their own classroom experience and writing up their findings, these scholars hope to further a conversation among Christian educators regarding the development of excellent service-learning experiences that are informed and enriched by faith-based knowledge and wisdom. The scholarly field of SoTL has been shaped over time by a great deal of discussion and debate, leading to various definitions of the term. This new field of scholarly examination was initially proposed by Boyer (1990) in Scholarship Reconsidered. In that book, Boyer broadened the idea of scholarship beyond the traditional aim of “discovery” to include “the scholarship of teaching” (along with other legitimate scholarly expressions). Further developments that occurred after Boyer’s 1995 death resulted in the adoption of term “scholarship of teaching and learning” (Boyer et al., 2015; Braxton et al., 2002; Glassick et al., 1997; Hutchings, 2000; Hutchings et al., 2011), which was meant to clarify that Boyer’s idea was more than simply scholarly teaching, but research that would seek to understand how and why learning occurred through (for example) an assignment, the design of a program, or a pedagogical approach. Boyer’s successor as president of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Lee Shulman (1993), emphasized the importance of making such research public through respected scholarly venues. Emphasizing that teaching should be a communal endeavor rather than being conducted in isolation, Shulman observed, “It’s clear that scholarship entails an artifact, a product, some form of community property that can be shared, discussed, critiqued, exchanged, built upon” (p. 7; see also Shulman, 2004). More recently, various scholars have advocated for faith-based SoTL to be offered within the context of Christian higher education, including an article in this journal by Kaak (2016) and a review of the literature, also in CHE, by Smith et al. (2014). Smith and colleagues","PeriodicalId":54039,"journal":{"name":"Christian Higher Education","volume":"143 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theme Issue: Faith and Learning in Action Across Academic Disciplines\",\"authors\":\"Calvin G. Roso, Paul Kaak, M. LaPorte\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15363759.2021.2004263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welcome to this theme issue of the Christian Higher Education journal! This collection of studies was developed within the investigative framework known as the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL; Bernstein, 2018; Miller-Young & Yeo, 2015). The researchers who contributed articles to this theme issue of the Christian Higher Education journal were involved in a multi-year collaborative project with the goal of better understanding the pedagogical relationship of service-learning infused with academic faith integration as experienced by students in a Christian university setting. In conducting research projects related to their own classroom experience and writing up their findings, these scholars hope to further a conversation among Christian educators regarding the development of excellent service-learning experiences that are informed and enriched by faith-based knowledge and wisdom. The scholarly field of SoTL has been shaped over time by a great deal of discussion and debate, leading to various definitions of the term. This new field of scholarly examination was initially proposed by Boyer (1990) in Scholarship Reconsidered. In that book, Boyer broadened the idea of scholarship beyond the traditional aim of “discovery” to include “the scholarship of teaching” (along with other legitimate scholarly expressions). Further developments that occurred after Boyer’s 1995 death resulted in the adoption of term “scholarship of teaching and learning” (Boyer et al., 2015; Braxton et al., 2002; Glassick et al., 1997; Hutchings, 2000; Hutchings et al., 2011), which was meant to clarify that Boyer’s idea was more than simply scholarly teaching, but research that would seek to understand how and why learning occurred through (for example) an assignment, the design of a program, or a pedagogical approach. Boyer’s successor as president of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Lee Shulman (1993), emphasized the importance of making such research public through respected scholarly venues. Emphasizing that teaching should be a communal endeavor rather than being conducted in isolation, Shulman observed, “It’s clear that scholarship entails an artifact, a product, some form of community property that can be shared, discussed, critiqued, exchanged, built upon” (p. 7; see also Shulman, 2004). More recently, various scholars have advocated for faith-based SoTL to be offered within the context of Christian higher education, including an article in this journal by Kaak (2016) and a review of the literature, also in CHE, by Smith et al. (2014). Smith and colleagues\",\"PeriodicalId\":54039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2021.2004263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2021.2004263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
欢迎来到基督教高等教育杂志的主题期!这一系列研究是在被称为教与学奖学金(SoTL;伯恩斯坦,2018;Miller-Young & Yeo, 2015)。为《基督教高等教育》杂志这期主题期刊撰写文章的研究人员参与了一个多年的合作项目,目的是更好地理解基督教大学环境中学生所经历的服务学习与学术信仰融合的教学关系。这些学者在进行与他们自己的课堂经验相关的研究项目并撰写他们的研究结果时,希望促进基督教教育者之间关于发展优秀的服务学习经验的对话,这些经验是由基于信仰的知识和智慧所告知和丰富的。随着时间的推移,SoTL的学术领域已经形成了大量的讨论和辩论,导致了这个术语的各种定义。这一新的学术考试领域最初是由Boyer(1990)在《学术反思》一书中提出的。在那本书中,Boyer拓宽了学术的概念,超越了传统的“发现”目标,包括“教学的学术”(以及其他合法的学术表达)。1995年Boyer去世后的进一步发展导致了“教学奖学金”一词的采用(Boyer等人,2015;Braxton et al., 2002;Glassick et al., 1997;钦斯,2000;Hutchings et al., 2011),其目的是澄清Boyer的想法不仅仅是简单的学术教学,而是通过(例如)作业,程序设计或教学方法来寻求理解学习如何以及为什么发生的研究。Boyer的继任者Lee Shulman(1993)是卡内基教学促进基金会的主席,他强调了通过受人尊敬的学术场所将这些研究公开的重要性。舒尔曼强调教学应该是一种共同的努力,而不是孤立地进行,“很明显,学术需要一种人工制品,一种产品,某种形式的社区财产,可以共享,讨论,批评,交换,建立”(第7页;参见Shulman, 2004)。最近,许多学者主张在基督教高等教育的背景下提供基于信仰的SoTL,包括Kaak(2016)在本刊上发表的一篇文章,以及Smith等人(2014)在CHE上发表的一篇文献综述。史密斯及其同事
Theme Issue: Faith and Learning in Action Across Academic Disciplines
Welcome to this theme issue of the Christian Higher Education journal! This collection of studies was developed within the investigative framework known as the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL; Bernstein, 2018; Miller-Young & Yeo, 2015). The researchers who contributed articles to this theme issue of the Christian Higher Education journal were involved in a multi-year collaborative project with the goal of better understanding the pedagogical relationship of service-learning infused with academic faith integration as experienced by students in a Christian university setting. In conducting research projects related to their own classroom experience and writing up their findings, these scholars hope to further a conversation among Christian educators regarding the development of excellent service-learning experiences that are informed and enriched by faith-based knowledge and wisdom. The scholarly field of SoTL has been shaped over time by a great deal of discussion and debate, leading to various definitions of the term. This new field of scholarly examination was initially proposed by Boyer (1990) in Scholarship Reconsidered. In that book, Boyer broadened the idea of scholarship beyond the traditional aim of “discovery” to include “the scholarship of teaching” (along with other legitimate scholarly expressions). Further developments that occurred after Boyer’s 1995 death resulted in the adoption of term “scholarship of teaching and learning” (Boyer et al., 2015; Braxton et al., 2002; Glassick et al., 1997; Hutchings, 2000; Hutchings et al., 2011), which was meant to clarify that Boyer’s idea was more than simply scholarly teaching, but research that would seek to understand how and why learning occurred through (for example) an assignment, the design of a program, or a pedagogical approach. Boyer’s successor as president of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Lee Shulman (1993), emphasized the importance of making such research public through respected scholarly venues. Emphasizing that teaching should be a communal endeavor rather than being conducted in isolation, Shulman observed, “It’s clear that scholarship entails an artifact, a product, some form of community property that can be shared, discussed, critiqued, exchanged, built upon” (p. 7; see also Shulman, 2004). More recently, various scholars have advocated for faith-based SoTL to be offered within the context of Christian higher education, including an article in this journal by Kaak (2016) and a review of the literature, also in CHE, by Smith et al. (2014). Smith and colleagues