监管评估中评估和数据整合的框架:监管毒理学中卓越的需要

C. Berry
{"title":"监管评估中评估和数据整合的框架:监管毒理学中卓越的需要","authors":"C. Berry","doi":"10.1177/2397847320951377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following a number of published expressions of concern about the reliability of experimental science and the implications of non-reproducibility for regulatory toxicology, the European Risk Forum undertook to consider what practises might improve the basis on which regulatory decisions might be made. Guidelines which may be useful in assessments are presented. The document acknowledges the value of the experimental standards used in most regulatory studies but indicates how these may fail to provide the ‘best outcome’ and how imperfect studies based on outdated views of pathophysiology of disease in H. Sapiens may offer little of predictive value.","PeriodicalId":23155,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research and Application","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations: The need for excellence in regulatory toxicology\",\"authors\":\"C. Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2397847320951377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following a number of published expressions of concern about the reliability of experimental science and the implications of non-reproducibility for regulatory toxicology, the European Risk Forum undertook to consider what practises might improve the basis on which regulatory decisions might be made. Guidelines which may be useful in assessments are presented. The document acknowledges the value of the experimental standards used in most regulatory studies but indicates how these may fail to provide the ‘best outcome’ and how imperfect studies based on outdated views of pathophysiology of disease in H. Sapiens may offer little of predictive value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology Research and Application\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology Research and Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397847320951377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397847320951377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在发表了一些关于实验科学的可靠性和不可再现性对管制毒理学的影响的关切之后,欧洲风险论坛承诺考虑哪些做法可能改善作出管制决定的基础。提出了在评估中可能有用的指导方针。该文件承认在大多数监管研究中使用的实验标准的价值,但指出这些可能无法提供“最佳结果”,以及基于过时的智人疾病病理生理学观点的不完善的研究可能提供很少的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations: The need for excellence in regulatory toxicology
Following a number of published expressions of concern about the reliability of experimental science and the implications of non-reproducibility for regulatory toxicology, the European Risk Forum undertook to consider what practises might improve the basis on which regulatory decisions might be made. Guidelines which may be useful in assessments are presented. The document acknowledges the value of the experimental standards used in most regulatory studies but indicates how these may fail to provide the ‘best outcome’ and how imperfect studies based on outdated views of pathophysiology of disease in H. Sapiens may offer little of predictive value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信