基于连续小波变换和多元校正的分光光度法测定复方制剂和生物液中抗精神病药物阿立哌唑和喹硫平的化学计量学方法

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Alibakhshi, M. Sohrabi, M. Davallo
{"title":"基于连续小波变换和多元校正的分光光度法测定复方制剂和生物液中抗精神病药物阿立哌唑和喹硫平的化学计量学方法","authors":"M. Alibakhshi, M. Sohrabi, M. Davallo","doi":"10.30492/IJCCE.2021.522622.4508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, two multivariate calibration methods, including partial least squares (PLS) and principal component regression (PCR), as well as continuous wavelet transform (CWT) along with spectrophotometry technique were developed for the simultaneous analysis of Aripiprazole (ARI) and Quetiapine (QTP) in the pharmaceutical formulation and biological fluid. The linear range of ARI and QTP were 1-3 and 2-10 μg mL-1, respectively for the proposed methods. The root mean square error (RMSE) of ARI and QTP related to the test set was obtained 0.014, 0.0758 and 0.194, 0.882 for PLS and PCR methods, respectively. Also, the mean recovery of ARI and QTP was 99.95, 100.04% and 97.38, 98.83% for PLS and PCR models, respectively. Among various families of wavelets in CWT technique, the Coiflet (Coif3) and Symlet (Sym2) families were selected to determine the value of ARI and QTP, respectively. In this method, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values were found 0.0033, 0.0200 and 0.2764, 0.3486 μg mL-1 for ARI and QTP, respectively. Mean recovery values of ARI and QTP in synthetic mixtures for CWT approach were 96.98%, 98.94%, respectively. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was applied to compare the results of both mentioned chemometrics models and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as a reference method. No significant difference was observed between these methods.","PeriodicalId":14572,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using chemometrics methods for determination of aripiprazole and quetiapine as antipsychotic drugs in pharmaceutical mixture and biological fluid by spectrophotometry method based on continuous wavelet transform and multivariate calibration\",\"authors\":\"M. Alibakhshi, M. Sohrabi, M. Davallo\",\"doi\":\"10.30492/IJCCE.2021.522622.4508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, two multivariate calibration methods, including partial least squares (PLS) and principal component regression (PCR), as well as continuous wavelet transform (CWT) along with spectrophotometry technique were developed for the simultaneous analysis of Aripiprazole (ARI) and Quetiapine (QTP) in the pharmaceutical formulation and biological fluid. The linear range of ARI and QTP were 1-3 and 2-10 μg mL-1, respectively for the proposed methods. The root mean square error (RMSE) of ARI and QTP related to the test set was obtained 0.014, 0.0758 and 0.194, 0.882 for PLS and PCR methods, respectively. Also, the mean recovery of ARI and QTP was 99.95, 100.04% and 97.38, 98.83% for PLS and PCR models, respectively. Among various families of wavelets in CWT technique, the Coiflet (Coif3) and Symlet (Sym2) families were selected to determine the value of ARI and QTP, respectively. In this method, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values were found 0.0033, 0.0200 and 0.2764, 0.3486 μg mL-1 for ARI and QTP, respectively. Mean recovery values of ARI and QTP in synthetic mixtures for CWT approach were 96.98%, 98.94%, respectively. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was applied to compare the results of both mentioned chemometrics models and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as a reference method. No significant difference was observed between these methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2021.522622.4508\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering-international English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30492/IJCCE.2021.522622.4508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究建立了偏最小二乘法(PLS)和主成分回归(PCR)两种多变量校准方法,以及连续小波变换(CWT)和分光光度法同时分析制剂和生物液中阿立哌唑(ARI)和喹硫平(QTP)的方法。该方法的ARI和QTP的线性范围分别为1 ~ 3和2 ~ 10 μ mL-1。PLS法和PCR法与检验集相关的ARI和QTP的均方根误差(RMSE)分别为0.014、0.0758和0.194、0.882。PLS和PCR模型的ARI和QTP平均回收率分别为99.95、100.04%和97.38、98.83%。在CWT技术的各种小波族中,选择Coiflet (Coif3)和Symlet (Sym2)族分别确定ARI和QTP的值。该方法对ARI和QTP的检出限和定量限分别为0.0033、0.0200和0.2764、0.3486 μ mL-1。CWT法合成混合物中ARI和QTP的平均回收率分别为96.98%和98.94%。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验比较两种化学计量模型的结果,并以高效液相色谱法(HPLC)作为参考方法。两种方法间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using chemometrics methods for determination of aripiprazole and quetiapine as antipsychotic drugs in pharmaceutical mixture and biological fluid by spectrophotometry method based on continuous wavelet transform and multivariate calibration
In this study, two multivariate calibration methods, including partial least squares (PLS) and principal component regression (PCR), as well as continuous wavelet transform (CWT) along with spectrophotometry technique were developed for the simultaneous analysis of Aripiprazole (ARI) and Quetiapine (QTP) in the pharmaceutical formulation and biological fluid. The linear range of ARI and QTP were 1-3 and 2-10 μg mL-1, respectively for the proposed methods. The root mean square error (RMSE) of ARI and QTP related to the test set was obtained 0.014, 0.0758 and 0.194, 0.882 for PLS and PCR methods, respectively. Also, the mean recovery of ARI and QTP was 99.95, 100.04% and 97.38, 98.83% for PLS and PCR models, respectively. Among various families of wavelets in CWT technique, the Coiflet (Coif3) and Symlet (Sym2) families were selected to determine the value of ARI and QTP, respectively. In this method, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values were found 0.0033, 0.0200 and 0.2764, 0.3486 μg mL-1 for ARI and QTP, respectively. Mean recovery values of ARI and QTP in synthetic mixtures for CWT approach were 96.98%, 98.94%, respectively. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was applied to compare the results of both mentioned chemometrics models and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as a reference method. No significant difference was observed between these methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering is to foster the growth of educational, scientific and Industrial Research activities among chemists and chemical engineers and to provide a medium for mutual communication and relations between Iranian academia and the industry on the one hand, and the world the scientific community on the other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信