毒品使用模式,减少危害的策略和使用毒品检查服务在繁荣的节日顾客

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Helena Valente, Daniel Martins, Marta Pinto, J. Fernandes, M. Barratt
{"title":"毒品使用模式,减少危害的策略和使用毒品检查服务在繁荣的节日顾客","authors":"Helena Valente, Daniel Martins, Marta Pinto, J. Fernandes, M. Barratt","doi":"10.1108/dhs-01-2022-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nRecent studies have shown that people who attend electronic dance music events and use drug checking services (DCS) are a predominantly white male, highly educated middle-class population. However, there is still a lack of data beyond sociodemographic characteristics that must be addressed. This paper aims to describe the drug use patterns and protective behavior strategies (PBS) used by testers and nontesters at Boom Festival 2018 and analyze the relationship between these behaviors and the decision to use the DCS.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis is an exploratory research based on a cross-sectional design using baseline data collected at the Boom Festival from testers (N = 343) and nontesters (N = 115).\n\n\nFindings\nNontesters presented, in general, slightly higher frequencies of use for most drugs, whereas testers tended to adopt PBS more frequently. Moreover, testers planned their drug use more often than nontesters and set more limits on the amount of drugs they used in one session. Both of these behaviors work as predictors for using the DCS.\n\n\nPractical implications\nOur data suggest that DCS might not be easily accessible to all people who use drugs, reaching almost exclusively highly educated people that already apply several harm reduction strategies. Actions should be taken to promote service accessibility.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to compare the demographics, drug use and PBS adoption of DCS users with nonusers who attended the same festival.\n","PeriodicalId":72849,"journal":{"name":"Drugs, habits and social policy","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug use patterns, harm reduction strategies and use of drug checking services in boom festival patrons\",\"authors\":\"Helena Valente, Daniel Martins, Marta Pinto, J. Fernandes, M. Barratt\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dhs-01-2022-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nRecent studies have shown that people who attend electronic dance music events and use drug checking services (DCS) are a predominantly white male, highly educated middle-class population. However, there is still a lack of data beyond sociodemographic characteristics that must be addressed. This paper aims to describe the drug use patterns and protective behavior strategies (PBS) used by testers and nontesters at Boom Festival 2018 and analyze the relationship between these behaviors and the decision to use the DCS.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis is an exploratory research based on a cross-sectional design using baseline data collected at the Boom Festival from testers (N = 343) and nontesters (N = 115).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nNontesters presented, in general, slightly higher frequencies of use for most drugs, whereas testers tended to adopt PBS more frequently. Moreover, testers planned their drug use more often than nontesters and set more limits on the amount of drugs they used in one session. Both of these behaviors work as predictors for using the DCS.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nOur data suggest that DCS might not be easily accessible to all people who use drugs, reaching almost exclusively highly educated people that already apply several harm reduction strategies. Actions should be taken to promote service accessibility.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to compare the demographics, drug use and PBS adoption of DCS users with nonusers who attended the same festival.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":72849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs, habits and social policy\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs, habits and social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-01-2022-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs, habits and social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-01-2022-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近的研究表明,参加电子舞曲活动和使用药物检查服务(DCS)的人主要是受过高等教育的中产阶级白人男性。然而,除了必须解决的社会人口特征之外,仍然缺乏数据。本文旨在描述2018年Boom Festival上测试人员和非测试人员使用的药物使用模式和保护行为策略(PBS),并分析这些行为与使用DCS决策之间的关系。设计/方法/方法这是一项探索性研究,基于横断面设计,使用Boom Festival上从测试人员(N = 343)和非测试人员(N = 115)收集的基线数据。一般来说,非测试者对大多数药物的使用频率略高,而测试者倾向于更频繁地采用PBS。此外,测试者比非测试者更经常地计划他们的药物使用,并且对他们在一次测试中使用的药物数量设置了更多的限制。这两种行为都可以作为使用DCS的预测因素。实际意义我们的数据表明,并非所有吸毒者都能轻易获得药物控制,几乎只有受过高等教育、已经采用了几种减少危害策略的人才能获得药物控制。应采取行动促进服务的可及性。原创性/价值据作者所知,本文首次比较了参加同一节日的DCS用户与非用户的人口统计学、药物使用和PBS采用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug use patterns, harm reduction strategies and use of drug checking services in boom festival patrons
Purpose Recent studies have shown that people who attend electronic dance music events and use drug checking services (DCS) are a predominantly white male, highly educated middle-class population. However, there is still a lack of data beyond sociodemographic characteristics that must be addressed. This paper aims to describe the drug use patterns and protective behavior strategies (PBS) used by testers and nontesters at Boom Festival 2018 and analyze the relationship between these behaviors and the decision to use the DCS. Design/methodology/approach This is an exploratory research based on a cross-sectional design using baseline data collected at the Boom Festival from testers (N = 343) and nontesters (N = 115). Findings Nontesters presented, in general, slightly higher frequencies of use for most drugs, whereas testers tended to adopt PBS more frequently. Moreover, testers planned their drug use more often than nontesters and set more limits on the amount of drugs they used in one session. Both of these behaviors work as predictors for using the DCS. Practical implications Our data suggest that DCS might not be easily accessible to all people who use drugs, reaching almost exclusively highly educated people that already apply several harm reduction strategies. Actions should be taken to promote service accessibility. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to compare the demographics, drug use and PBS adoption of DCS users with nonusers who attended the same festival.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信