在具有拜占庭故障的系统中从SWSR寄存器实现SWMR寄存器

Xing Hu, S. Toueg
{"title":"在具有拜占庭故障的系统中从SWSR寄存器实现SWMR寄存器","authors":"Xing Hu, S. Toueg","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2207.01470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of registers from (potentially) weaker registers is a classical problem in the theory of distributed computing. Since Lamport's pioneering work [13], this problem has been extensively studied in the context of asynchronous processes with crash failures. In this paper, we investigate this problem in the context of Byzantine process failures, with and without process signatures. We first prove that, without signatures, there is no wait-free linearizable implementation of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer 1-reader registers. In fact, we show a stronger result, namely, even under the assumption that the writer can only crash and at most one reader can be malicious, there is no linearizable implementation of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer (n-1)-reader registers that ensures that every correct process eventually completes its operations. In light of this impossibility result, we give two implementations of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer 1-reader registers that work under different assumptions. The first implementation is linearizable (under any combination of process failures), but it guarantees that every correct process eventually completes its operations only under the assumption that the writer is correct or no reader is malicious -- thus matching the impossibility result. The second implementation assumes process signatures; it is bounded wait-free and linearizable under any combination of process failures. Finally, we show that without process signatures, even if we assume that the writer is correct and at most one of the readers can be malicious, it is impossible to guarantee that every correct reader completes each read operation in a bounded number of steps.","PeriodicalId":89463,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing","volume":"2 1","pages":"36:1-36:19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On implementing SWMR registers from SWSR registers in systems with Byzantine failures\",\"authors\":\"Xing Hu, S. Toueg\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2207.01470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The implementation of registers from (potentially) weaker registers is a classical problem in the theory of distributed computing. Since Lamport's pioneering work [13], this problem has been extensively studied in the context of asynchronous processes with crash failures. In this paper, we investigate this problem in the context of Byzantine process failures, with and without process signatures. We first prove that, without signatures, there is no wait-free linearizable implementation of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer 1-reader registers. In fact, we show a stronger result, namely, even under the assumption that the writer can only crash and at most one reader can be malicious, there is no linearizable implementation of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer (n-1)-reader registers that ensures that every correct process eventually completes its operations. In light of this impossibility result, we give two implementations of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer 1-reader registers that work under different assumptions. The first implementation is linearizable (under any combination of process failures), but it guarantees that every correct process eventually completes its operations only under the assumption that the writer is correct or no reader is malicious -- thus matching the impossibility result. The second implementation assumes process signatures; it is bounded wait-free and linearizable under any combination of process failures. Finally, we show that without process signatures, even if we assume that the writer is correct and at most one of the readers can be malicious, it is impossible to guarantee that every correct reader completes each read operation in a bounded number of steps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"36:1-36:19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.01470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.01470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从(潜在的)较弱的寄存器中实现寄存器是分布式计算理论中的一个经典问题。自从Lamport的开创性工作[13]以来,这个问题在异步进程崩溃失败的背景下得到了广泛的研究。在本文中,我们研究了在拜占庭进程失效的背景下,有和没有进程签名的这个问题。我们首先证明,在没有签名的情况下,从原子1-writer 1-reader寄存器中不存在1-writer n-reader寄存器的无等待线性化实现。事实上,我们展示了一个更强的结果,即,即使假设写入器只能崩溃,并且最多有一个读取器可能是恶意的,也没有从原子1-writer (n-1)-reader寄存器中线性实现1-writer n-reader寄存器,以确保每个正确的进程最终完成其操作。考虑到这个不可能的结果,我们给出了原子1-写1-读寄存器的两个1-写n-读寄存器的实现,它们在不同的假设下工作。第一种实现是线性化的(在任何进程失败的组合下),但它保证每个正确的进程最终完成其操作的前提是假设写入器是正确的,或者没有读取器是恶意的——因此匹配不可能的结果。第二个实现假定流程签名;在任何过程失败的组合下,它是有界的无等待和线性化的。最后,我们表明,如果没有进程签名,即使我们假设写入器是正确的,并且最多有一个读取器可能是恶意的,也不可能保证每个正确的读取器在有限的步骤中完成每个读取操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On implementing SWMR registers from SWSR registers in systems with Byzantine failures
The implementation of registers from (potentially) weaker registers is a classical problem in the theory of distributed computing. Since Lamport's pioneering work [13], this problem has been extensively studied in the context of asynchronous processes with crash failures. In this paper, we investigate this problem in the context of Byzantine process failures, with and without process signatures. We first prove that, without signatures, there is no wait-free linearizable implementation of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer 1-reader registers. In fact, we show a stronger result, namely, even under the assumption that the writer can only crash and at most one reader can be malicious, there is no linearizable implementation of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer (n-1)-reader registers that ensures that every correct process eventually completes its operations. In light of this impossibility result, we give two implementations of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer 1-reader registers that work under different assumptions. The first implementation is linearizable (under any combination of process failures), but it guarantees that every correct process eventually completes its operations only under the assumption that the writer is correct or no reader is malicious -- thus matching the impossibility result. The second implementation assumes process signatures; it is bounded wait-free and linearizable under any combination of process failures. Finally, we show that without process signatures, even if we assume that the writer is correct and at most one of the readers can be malicious, it is impossible to guarantee that every correct reader completes each read operation in a bounded number of steps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信