A. Wilczynska, Ram B. Singh, J. Fedacko, S. Singhal
{"title":"社会阶层与冠状动脉疾病相关的A型行为问卷的验证:印度A型行为评定量表","authors":"A. Wilczynska, Ram B. Singh, J. Fedacko, S. Singhal","doi":"10.17554/j.issn.2309-6861.2018.05.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conduc4ed to validate the questionnaire for assessment of type A behaviour and to determine its relation with socioeconomic status and coronary artery disease(CAD) in a randomly selected urban population. We studied 1806 subjects (904 men and 902 women) aged 25-64 years. The survey instruments were questionnaire: modified from existing questionnaires (Likeret scale, Jenkins activity survey and Friedman and Rosenman structured interview questionnaires). The questionnaire for assessment of type A behaviour was administered by a psychologist and subjects were divided into type A behaviour (n=306), possible type A behaviour (n=157) or no such behaviour (n=1343) according to rating of their type A behaviour based on scores of various attributes such as hostility, aggressiveness, ambitiousness, competitiveness and pace or time urgency. The prevalence of type A behaviour was significantly greater among men compared to women (21.9 vs 11.9%, p<0.01). The overall prevalence of type A and possible type A behavior was also significantly higher in men than women (32.4 vs 18.8%, p<0.01) and the overall prevalence of total behaviour abnormality was 25.6% in both sexes. Type A behaviour was highly prevalent among social class 1 and 2 subjects in both sexes and showed significant association with CAD. The findings indicate that type A behaviour assessed by scores constructed based on various attributes of behaviour is accurate and the personality rating scale validated by us may be used successfully in other population groups of India.","PeriodicalId":92802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","volume":"os-44 1","pages":"707-712"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation Of Type A Behaviour Questionnaire In Relation To Social Class And Coronary Artery Disease : The Indian Rating Scale For Type A Behaviour\",\"authors\":\"A. Wilczynska, Ram B. Singh, J. Fedacko, S. Singhal\",\"doi\":\"10.17554/j.issn.2309-6861.2018.05.139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conduc4ed to validate the questionnaire for assessment of type A behaviour and to determine its relation with socioeconomic status and coronary artery disease(CAD) in a randomly selected urban population. We studied 1806 subjects (904 men and 902 women) aged 25-64 years. The survey instruments were questionnaire: modified from existing questionnaires (Likeret scale, Jenkins activity survey and Friedman and Rosenman structured interview questionnaires). The questionnaire for assessment of type A behaviour was administered by a psychologist and subjects were divided into type A behaviour (n=306), possible type A behaviour (n=157) or no such behaviour (n=1343) according to rating of their type A behaviour based on scores of various attributes such as hostility, aggressiveness, ambitiousness, competitiveness and pace or time urgency. The prevalence of type A behaviour was significantly greater among men compared to women (21.9 vs 11.9%, p<0.01). The overall prevalence of type A and possible type A behavior was also significantly higher in men than women (32.4 vs 18.8%, p<0.01) and the overall prevalence of total behaviour abnormality was 25.6% in both sexes. Type A behaviour was highly prevalent among social class 1 and 2 subjects in both sexes and showed significant association with CAD. The findings indicate that type A behaviour assessed by scores constructed based on various attributes of behaviour is accurate and the personality rating scale validated by us may be used successfully in other population groups of India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"os-44 1\",\"pages\":\"707-712\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17554/j.issn.2309-6861.2018.05.139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17554/j.issn.2309-6861.2018.05.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本研究旨在验证A型行为评估问卷的有效性,并确定其与社会经济地位和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的关系。我们研究了1806名受试者(904名男性和902名女性),年龄在25-64岁之间。调查工具为问卷:根据现有问卷(Likeret量表、Jenkins活动问卷和Friedman和Rosenman结构化访谈问卷)进行修改。A型行为评估问卷由一名心理学家进行,根据他们的A型行为的各种属性,如敌意、侵略性、野心、竞争力和速度或时间紧迫性的得分,受试者被分为A型行为(n=306)、可能的A型行为(n=157)或没有A型行为(n=1343)。A型行为在男性中的患病率明显高于女性(21.9% vs 11.9%, p<0.01)。男性A型及可能A型行为的总体患病率明显高于女性(32.4 vs 18.8%, p<0.01),两性总行为异常的总体患病率为25.6%。A型行为在社会1级和社会2级受试者中普遍存在,且与CAD有显著相关性。研究结果表明,基于行为的各种属性构建的分数评估A型行为是准确的,我们验证的人格评定量表可能在印度其他人群中成功使用。
Validation Of Type A Behaviour Questionnaire In Relation To Social Class And Coronary Artery Disease : The Indian Rating Scale For Type A Behaviour
This study was conduc4ed to validate the questionnaire for assessment of type A behaviour and to determine its relation with socioeconomic status and coronary artery disease(CAD) in a randomly selected urban population. We studied 1806 subjects (904 men and 902 women) aged 25-64 years. The survey instruments were questionnaire: modified from existing questionnaires (Likeret scale, Jenkins activity survey and Friedman and Rosenman structured interview questionnaires). The questionnaire for assessment of type A behaviour was administered by a psychologist and subjects were divided into type A behaviour (n=306), possible type A behaviour (n=157) or no such behaviour (n=1343) according to rating of their type A behaviour based on scores of various attributes such as hostility, aggressiveness, ambitiousness, competitiveness and pace or time urgency. The prevalence of type A behaviour was significantly greater among men compared to women (21.9 vs 11.9%, p<0.01). The overall prevalence of type A and possible type A behavior was also significantly higher in men than women (32.4 vs 18.8%, p<0.01) and the overall prevalence of total behaviour abnormality was 25.6% in both sexes. Type A behaviour was highly prevalent among social class 1 and 2 subjects in both sexes and showed significant association with CAD. The findings indicate that type A behaviour assessed by scores constructed based on various attributes of behaviour is accurate and the personality rating scale validated by us may be used successfully in other population groups of India.